Political Behavior

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 677–700 | Cite as

Reconciling Sexism and Women’s Support for Republican Candidates: A Look at Gender, Class, and Whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 Presidential Races

  • Erin C. CasseseEmail author
  • Tiffany D. Barnes
Original Paper


Much of the gender gap literature focuses on women’s greater average liberalism relative to men. This approach masks considerable heterogeneity in political identity and behavior among women based on race, class, and other key socio-demographic characteristics. In the 2016 Presidential contest, political divisions among women were evident in exit polling, which demonstrated that a majority of white women voted for Donald Trump. This was not an anomaly but reflects a more long-standing distinction between white women and women of other racial and ethnic identifications. In this paper, we draw on intersectionality and system justification theory as frameworks for exploring the distinctive political behavior of white women. Using data from the 2012 and 2016 American National Election Studies, we evaluate the factors that attracted white women voters to the GOP and kept them in the fold in spite of expectations that sexism in the campaign would drive women away from the party during the 2016 Presidential race. Our analyses show that many white women endorse sexist beliefs, and that these beliefs were strong determinants of their vote choice in 2016, more so than in 2012. Our findings also point to important divisions among white women based on educational attainment and household income in terms of both the endorsement of sexism and vote choice. These results shed new light on white women’s political behavior and qualify the existing gender gap literature in important ways, offering new insights into the ways whiteness, gender, and class intersect to shape political behavior.


Gender gap Intersectionality System justification theory Hostile sexism Voting behavior Class Whiteness 

Supplementary material

11109_2018_9468_MOESM1_ESM.docx (198 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 197 kb)


  1. Barnes, T. D., Beaulieu, E., & Saxton, G. (2018). Sex and corruption: How sexism shapes voters’ responses to scandal. Politics, Groups & Identities. Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, T., & Cassese, E. (2017). American party women: A look at the gender gap within parties. Political Research Quarterly, 70(1), 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Begany, J. J., & Milburn, M. A. (2002). Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: Authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 3(2), 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bock, J., Byrd-Craven, J., & Burkley, M. (2017). The role of sexism in voting in the 2016 presidential election. Personality and Individual Differences, 119(1), 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., De Boef, S., & Lin, T.-M. (2004). The dynamics of the partisan gender gap. American Political Science Review, 98(3), 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bracic, A., Israel-Trummel, M., & Shortle, A. (2018). Is sexism for white people? Gender stereotypes, race, and the 2016 presidential election. Political Behavior. Scholar
  7. Brown, N. E., & Gershon, S. A. (2016). Introduction. In N. E. Brown & S. A. Gershon (Eds.), Distinct identities: Minority women in US politics (pp. 1–11). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, S. (2006). Voting choices: Meet you at the gender gap. In S. J. Carroll & R. Fox (Eds.), Gender and elections: Shaping the future of American politics (pp. 74–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cassese, E., & Barnes, T. (2018). Intersectional motherhood: Investigating public support for child care subsidies. Politics, Groups & Identities.Google Scholar
  10. Cassese, E. C., Barnes, T. D., & Branton, R. P. (2015). Racializing gender: Public opinion at the intersection. Politics & Gender, 11(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassese, E., & Holman, M. R. (2016). Religious beliefs, gender consciousness, and women’s political participation. Sex Roles., 75(9), 514–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cassese, E., & Holman, M. R. (Forthcoming) Playing the woman card: Ambivalent sexism in the 2016 U.S. presidential race. Political Psychology. Google Scholar
  13. CAWP. (2017). The gender gap: Voting choices in presidential elections. Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP), Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University. Retrieved May 7, 2018 from
  14. Chaney, C. K., Michael Alvarez, R., & Nagler, J. (1998). Explaining the gender gap in U.S. presidential elections, 1980-1992. Political Research Quarterly, 51(2), 311–339.Google Scholar
  15. Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christopher, A. N., & Mull, M. S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clement, S., & Guskin, E. (2017). Exit poll results: How different groups voted in Alabama. The Washington Post. Retrieved May 7, 2018 from
  18. CNN. (2016). Exit polls. Retrieved September 17, 2017 from
  19. Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Collins, P. H. (1993). Toward a New Vision: Race, class, and gender as categories of analysis and connection. Race, Sex & Class, 1(1), 25–45.Google Scholar
  21. Collins, P. H. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1(8), 139–167.Google Scholar
  24. Deckman, M. (2016). Tea party women: Mama grizzlies, grassroots leaders, and the changing face of the American right. New York: NYU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Diekman, A. B., & Schneider, M. C. (2010). A social role theory perspective on gender gaps in political attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 486–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frankenberg, R. (1993). White women, race matters: The social construction of whiteness. St. Paul: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fry, R., & Kochhar, R. (2016). Are you in the American middle class? Pew Research CenterFactTank. Retrieved . May 7, 2018 from
  28. Gillion, D. Q., Ladd, J. M., & Meredith, M. (Forthcoming). Party polarization, ideological sorting and the emergence of the partisan gender gap. British Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
  29. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hancock, A.-M. (2016). Intersectionality: An intellectual history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hebl, M. R., King, E. B., Glick, P., Singletary, S. L., & Kazama, S. (2007). Hostile and benevolent reactions toward pregnant women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1499–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huddy, L. (2003). From group identity to political cohesion and commitment. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 511–558). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hurtado, A., & Stewart, A. J. (2004). Through the looking glass: Implications of studying whiteness for feminist methods. In M. Fine, L. Weis, L. P. Pruitt, & A. Burns (Eds.), Off white: Readings on power, privilege, and resistance (pp. 315–330). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Iverson, T., & Rosenbluth, F. (2010). Women, work & politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Junn, J. (2017). The Trump Majority: white womanhood and the making of female voters in the U.S. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(2), 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Katz, J. (2016). Man enough? Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and the politics of presidential masculinity. Northhampton, MA: Interlink Books.Google Scholar
  39. Kaufmann, K. M., & Petrocik, J. R. (1999). The changing politics of American Men: Understanding the sources of the gender gap. American Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 864–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kellstadt, P. M., Peterson, D. A., & Ramirez, M. D. (2010). The macro politics of a gender gap. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(3), 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levine-Rasky, C. (2011). Intersectionality theory applied to whiteness and middle-classness. Social Identities, 17(2), 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mansbridge, J. J. (1985). Myth and Reality: The ERA and the gender gap in the 1980 election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(2), 164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Manza, J., & Brooks, C. (1998). The gender gap in US presidential elections: When? Why? Implications? American Journal of Sociology, 103(5), 1235–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Masser, B. M., & Abrams, D. (2004). Reinforcing the glass ceiling: The consequences of hostile sexism for female managerial candidates. Sex Roles, 51(9–10), 609–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Masser, B., Tendayi Viki, G., & Power, C. (2006). Hostile sexism and rape proclivity amongst men. Sex Roles, 54(7/8), 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Norrander, B. (2008). The history of the gender gaps. In L. D. Whittaker (Ed.), Voting the gender gap (pp. 9–32). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  48. Norrander, B., & Wilcox, C. (2008). The gender gap in ideology. Political Behavior, 30(4), 503–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ondercin, H. L. (2013). What Scarlet O’Hara thinks: Political attitudes of Southern women. Political Science Quarterly, 128(2), 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ondercin, H. L. (2017). Who is responsible for the gender gap? The dynamics of men’s and women’s democratic macropartisanship, 1950–2012. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 749–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pew (2016). Black voter turnout fell in 2016, even as a record number of Americans cast ballots. Pew Research Center. Retrieved May 7, 2018 from
  52. Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1021–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sapiro, V., & Conover, P. J. (1997). The variable gender basis of electoral politics: Gender and context in the 1992 US election. British Journal of Political Science, 27(4), 497–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schaffner, B., MacWilliams, M., & Nteta, T. (2018). Explaining white polarization in the 2016 vote for president: The sobering role of racism and sexism. Political Studies Quarterly, 133(1), 9–34.Google Scholar
  55. Schreiber, R. (2014). Understanding the future of feminism requires understanding conservative women. Politics & Gender, 10(2), 276–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Seltzer, R., Newman, J., & Leighton, M. V. (1997). Sex as a political variable: Women as candidates and voters in US elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  57. Sue, D. W. (2004). Whiteness and ethnocentric monoculturalism: Making the ‘invisible’ visible. American Psychologist, 59(8), 761–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Valentino, N. A., Wayne, C., & Oceno, M. (2018). Mobilizing sexism: The interaction of emotion and gender attitudes in the 2016 US presidential election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 213–235.Google Scholar
  60. Welch, S., & Hibbing, J. (1992). Financial conditions, gender and voting in american national elections. Journal of Politics, 54(1), 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wellman, D. T. (1993). Portraits of white racism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Williams, R. (2009). Using heterogeneous choice models to compare logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociological Methods and Research, 37(4), 531–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations