The Role of Elite Accounts in Mitigating the Negative Effects of Repositioning
- 392 Downloads
Repositioning by political elites plays a key role in a variety of political phenomena, including legislative policymaking and campaigning. While previous studies suggest that repositioning will lead to negative evaluations, these studies have not explored the role of elite communications in structuring mass responses. We argue that this omission is problematic because elite explanations for their actions may limit the costs associated with ‘flip-flopping’ by persuading some citizens to update their attitudes so that they agree with the elite’s new stance and also by molding beliefs about the motives of the elite when repositioning. We present evidence supportive of this argument obtained from two large experiments conducted on samples of American adults. Ultimately, we show that elites offering a satisfactory justification for their change can avoid most, if not all, of the evaluative costs that would otherwise occur. This study thus has important implications not just for this particular element of elite behavior, but also related questions concerning governmental accountability and representation.
KeywordsExplanation Repositioning Communication Persuasion Motives
I thank Jamie Druckman, Thomas Leeper, Martin Bisgaard, Jennifer Jerit, Jason Barabas, participants in the Political Behavior Workshop at Aarhus University, and two anonymous reviewers for their incisive comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. This article is better for their feedback; all remaining errors remain my own. Study 1 was funded via a Graduate Research Grant from Northwestern University.
- Babington, C. 2011. Romney campaign hits back after Dem ‘Flip’ charges. Associated Press. http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/romney-campaign-hits-back-after-dem-flip-charges/.
- Broockman, D. E., & Butler, D.M. (2015). The causal effects of elite position-taking on voter attitudes: Field experiments with elite communication. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477.Google Scholar
- Carlson, J. M., & Dolan, K. (1985). The waffle phenomenon and candidates’ image. Physiological Reports, 57(3), 795–798.Google Scholar
- Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1989). Issue evolution: race and the transformation of american politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Cillizza, C. (2015). Why it’s tough for Hillary Clinton to explain away her flip-flops. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/10/15/hillary-clinton-gave-the-exact-right-answer-to-explain-her-flip-flops-it-still-might-not-work/.
- Cirilli, K. (2013). Rob portman backs gay marriage after son comes out. Politico. http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/rob-portman-gay-marriage-stance-88903.html.
- Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home style: House Members in their districts. Chicago: Scott Foresman & Co. Book.Google Scholar
- Roselli, M. (2004). “Kerry discusses $87 billion comment.” CNN. http://edition.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/30/kerry.comment/.
- Sullivan, S., & Johnson, J. (2015). GOP candidates are flip-flopping to please the base. That could hurt later on. The Washington post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/its-flip-flop-season-as-presidential-hopefuls-move-to-cater-to-the-base/2015/05/21/5f281ca4-ff45-11e4-8b6c-0dcce21e223d_story.html.
- Tomz, M., & Van Houweling, R. P. (2012a). Candidate repositioning. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24724021/Repositioning.pdf.
- Tomz, M., & Van Houweling, R. P. (2012b). Political pledges as credible commitments. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24724021/Pledges.pdf.
- Tyler, T. R. (2011). Why people cooperate: The role of social motivations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1996). Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 331–357). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vavreck, L. (2015). “Jeb Bush, and two myths about shifting to the right.” The upshot. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/03/upshot/jeb-bush-and-two-myths-about-shifting-to-the-right-.html?abt=0002&abg=1.
- Wolbrecht, C. (2000). The politics of women’s rights: Parties, positions, and change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar