Advertisement

Plant Molecular Biology Reporter

, Volume 36, Issue 5–6, pp 822–831 | Cite as

Early Changes in S-Nitrosoproteome in Soybean Seedlings Under Flooding Stress

  • Akiko HashiguchiEmail author
  • Setsuko KomatsuEmail author
Original Paper
  • 139 Downloads

Abstract

The shift from aerobic to anaerobic respiration is crucial for soybean response to flooding stress; however, the regulatory mechanism in action at the initial stage of flooding stress has not been fully elucidated. To identify this mechanism in soybean, proteomic analysis of S-nitrosylated proteins was performed with emphasis on nitric oxide (NO)-mediated regulation in soybean seedlings. Removal of NO by addition of 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (cPTIO) partially restored seedling growth. After 3, 9, and 24 h of flooding stress, the S-nitrosylation status of 364, 188, and 186 proteins was altered relative to the corresponding status before flooding, respectively. Abundance of S-nitrosylated forms of 2, 186, and 162 proteins differed between the untreated control and flooded soybean plants after 3, 9, and 24 h of flooding stress, respectively. After flooding for 3 h, development, stress, and glycolysis/fermentation categories were identified as the top categories including proteins for which abundance of S-nitrosylated forms increased. Visualization of changes in S-nitrosylation profile by pathway mapping indicated a characteristic pattern in glycolysis/fermentation. Western blot analysis confirmed that S-nitrosylated status of alcohol dehydrogenase increased with flooding. These results suggest that S-nitrosylation comprises rapid molecular processes that change the abundance of the active form of alcohol dehydrogenase.

Keywords

Soybean Flooding stress S-nitrosylation Fermentation Alcohol dehydrogenase 

Abbreviations

PTM

Post-translational modification

NO

Nitric oxide

GAPDH

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

ADH

Alcohol dehydrogenase

cPTIO

2-(4-Carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide

LC

Liquid chromatography

MS

Mass spectrometry

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Xin Wang for the technical support of this research.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP15H04445.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal participants performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

11105_2018_1124_MOESM1_ESM.docx (24 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 23 kb)
11105_2018_1124_MOESM2_ESM.docx (50 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 50 kb)
11105_2018_1124_MOESM3_ESM.docx (94 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 94 kb)
11105_2018_1124_MOESM4_ESM.docx (91 kb)
ESM 4 (DOCX 90 kb)
11105_2018_1124_MOESM5_ESM.docx (80 kb)
ESM 5 (DOCX 80 kb)
11105_2018_1124_MOESM6_ESM.docx (71 kb)
ESM 6 (DOCX 70 kb)
11105_2018_1124_MOESM7_ESM.docx (52 kb)
ESM 7 (DOCX 51 kb)
11105_2018_1124_MOESM8_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 8 (DOCX 16 kb)
11105_2018_1124_MOESM9_ESM.docx (33 kb)
ESM 9 (DOCX 33 kb)
11105_2018_1124_MOESM10_ESM.docx (39 kb)
ESM 10 (DOCX 38 kb)
11105_2018_1124_MOESM11_ESM.docx (33 kb)
ESM 11 (DOCX 32 kb)
11105_2018_1124_MOESM12_ESM.docx (37 kb)
ESM 12 (DOCX 36 kb)
11105_2018_1124_MOESM13_ESM.pptx (1.3 mb)
ESM 13 (PPTX 1355 kb)

References

  1. Abat JK, Deswal R (2009) Differential modulation of S-nitrosoproteome of Brassica juncea by low temperature: change in S-nitrosylation of Rubisco is responsible for the inactivation of its carboxylase activity. Proteomics 9:4368–4380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal GK, Rakwal R, Jwa NS, Agrawal VP (2002) Characterization of a novel rice gene OsATX and modulation of its expression by components of the stress signalling pathways. Physiol Plant 116:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arasimowicz-Jelonek M, Floryszak-Wieczorek J, Deckert J, Rucińska-Sobkowiak R, Gzyl J, Pawlak-Sprada S, Abramowski D, Jelonek T, Gwóźdź EA (2012) Nitric oxide implication in cadmium-induced programmed cell death in roots and signaling response of yellow lupine plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 58:124–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Battaglia M, Olvera-Carrillo Y, Garciarrubio A, Campos F, Covarrubias AA (2008) The enigmatic LEA proteins and other hydrophilins. Plant Physiol 148:6–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benhar M, Forrester MT, Stamler JS (2009) Protein denitrosylation: enzymatic mechanisms and cellular functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:721–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bokszczanin KL, Solanaceae Pollen Thermotolerance Initial Training Network (SPOT-ITN) Consortium, Fragkostefanakis S (2013) Perspectives on deciphering mechanisms underlying plant heat stress response and thermotolerance. Front Plant Sci 4:315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camejo D, Romero-Puertas Mdel C, Rodríguez-Serrano M, Sandalio LM, Lázaro JJ, Jiménez A, Sevilla F (2013) Salinity-induced changes in S-nitrosylation of pea mitochondrial proteins. J Proteome 79:87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Camejo D, Ortiz-Espín A, Lázaro JJ, Romero-Puertas MC, Lázaro-Payo A, Sevilla F, Jiménez A (2015) Functional and structural changes in plant mitochondrial PrxII F caused by NO. J Proteome 119:112–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng T, Chen J, Ef AA, Wang P, Wang G, Hu X, Shi J (2015) Quantitative proteomics analysis reveals that S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) and nitric oxide signaling enhance poplar defense against chilling stress. Planta 242:1361–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corpas FJ, Barroso JB (2014) Peroxynitrite (ONOO-) is endogenously produced in arabidopsis peroxisomes and is overproduced under cadmium stress. Ann Bot 113:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Floryszak-Wieczorek J, Arasimowicz M, Milczarek G, Jelen H, Jackowiak H (2007) Only an early nitric oxide burst and the following wave of secondary nitric oxide generation enhanced effective defence responses of pelargonium to a necrotrophic pathogen. New Phytol 175:718–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freschi L (2013) Nitric oxide and phytohormone interactions: current status and perspectives. Front Plant Sci 4:398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gadelha CG, Miranda RS, Alencar NL, Costa JH, Prisco JT, Gomes-Filho E (2017) Exogenous nitric oxide improves salt tolerance during establishment of Jatropha curcas seedlings by ameliorating oxidative damage and toxic ion accumulation. J Plant Physiol 212:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gergel D, Cederbaum AI (1996) Inhibition of the catalytic activity of alcohol dehydrogenase by nitric oxide is associated with S nitrosylation and the release of zinc. Biochemistry 35:16186–16194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giustarini D, Dalle-Donne I, Colombo R, Milzani A, Rossi R (2008) Is ascorbate able to reduce disulfide bridges? A cautionary note. Nitric Oxide 19:252–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hashiguchi A, Sakata K, Komatsu S (2009) Proteome analysis of early-stage soybean seedlings under flooding stress. J Proteome Res 8:2058–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Höög JO, Ostberg LJ (2011) Mammalian alcohol dehydrogenases—a comparative investigation at gene and protein levels. Chem Biol Interact 191:2–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hossain MA, Bhattacharjee S, Armin SM, Qian P, Xin W, Li HY, Burritt DJ, Fujita M, Tran LS (2015) Hydrogen peroxide priming modulates abiotic oxidative stress tolerance: insights from ROS detoxification and scavenging. Front Plant Sci 6:420PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaffrey SR, Snyder SH (2001) The biotin switch method for the detection of S-nitrosylated proteins. Sci STKE 2001:pl1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kissoudis C, van de Wiel C, Visser RG, van der Linden G (2014) Enhancing crop resilience to combined abiotic and biotic stress through the dissection of physiological and molecular crosstalk. Front Plant Sci 5:207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Komatsu S, Deschamps T, Hiraga S, Kato M, Chiba M, Hashiguchi A, Tougou M, Shimamura S, Yasue H (2011a) Characterization of a novel flooding stress-responsive alcohol dehydrogenase expressed in soybean roots. Plant Mol Biol 77:309–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Komatsu S, Yamamoto A, Nakamura T, Nouri MZ, Nanjo Y, Nishizawa K, Furukawa K (2011b) Comprehensive analysis of mitochondria in roots and hypocotyls of soybean under flooding stress using proteomics and metabolomics techniques. J Proteome Res 10:3993–4004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Komatsu S, Han C, Nanjo Y, Altaf-Un-Nahar M, Wang K, He D, Yang P (2013) Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of abscisic acid effect in early-stage soybean under flooding. J Proteome Res 12:4769–4784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Komatsu S, Tougou M, Nanjo Y (2015) Proteomic techniques and management of flooding tolerance in soybean. J Proteome Res 14:3768–3778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li F, Sonveaux P, Rabbani ZN, Liu S, Yan B, Huang Q, Vujaskovic Z, Dewhirst MW, Li CY (2007) Regulation of HIF-1alpha stability through S-nitrosylation. Mol Cell 26:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lindermayr C, Saalbach G, Durner J (2005) Proteomic identification of S-nitrosylated proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 137:921–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ma Z, Marsolais F, Bykova NV, Igamberdiev AU (2016) Nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species mediate metabolic changes in barley seed embryo during germination. Front Plant Sci 7:138PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Nanjo Y, Skultety L, Ashraf Y, Komatsu S (2010) Comparative proteomic analysis of early-stage soybean seedlings responses to flooding by using gel and gel-free techniques. J Proteome Res 9:3989–4002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nanjo Y, Skultety L, Uváčková L, Klubicová K, Hajduch M, Komatsu S (2012) Mass spectrometry-based analysis of proteomic changes in the root tips of flooded soybean seedlings. J Proteome Res 11:372–385Google Scholar
  30. Paige JS, Xu G, Stancevic B, Jaffrey SR (2008) Nitrosothiol reactivity profiling identifies S-nitrosylated proteins with unexpected stability. Chem Biol 15:1307–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Santa-Cruz DM, Pacienza NA, Zilli CG, Tomaro ML, Balestrasse KB, Yannarelli GG (2014) Nitric oxide induced specific isoforms of antioxidant enzymes in soybean leaves subjected to enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 141:202–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scott HD, DeAngulo J, Daniel MB, Wood LS (1988) Flood duration effects on soybean growth and yield. Agron J 81:631–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shimoda Y, Nagata M, Suzuki A, Abe M, Sato S, Kato T, Tabata S, Higashi S, Uchiumi T (2005) Symbiotic rhizobium and nitric oxide induce gene expression of non-symbiotic hemoglobin in Lotus japonicus. Plant Cell Physiol 46:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tougou M, Hashiguchi A, Yukawa K, Nanjo Y, Hiraga S, Nakamura T, Nishizawa K, Komatsu S (2012) Responses to flooding stress in soybean seedlings with the alcohol dehydrogenase transgene. Plant Biotech 29:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Usadel B, Nagel A, Thimm O, Redestig H, Blaesing OE, Palacios-Rojas N, Selbig J, Hannemann J, Piques MC, Steinhauser D, Scheible WR, Gibon Y, Morcuende R, Weicht D, Meyer S, Stitt M (2005) Extension of the visualization tool MapMan to allow statistical analysis of arrays, display of corresponding genes, and comparison with known responses. Plant Physiol 138:1195–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Usadel B, Poree F, Nagel A, Lohse M, Czedik-Eysenberg A, Stitt M (2009) A guide to using MapMan to visualize and compare omics data in plants: a case study in the crop species, maize. Plant Cell Environ 32:1211–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vanzo E, Ghirardo A, Merl-Pham J, Lindermayr C, Heller W, Hauck SM, Durner J, Schnitzler JP (2014) S-Nitroso-proteome in poplar leaves in response to acute ozone stress. PLoS One 9:e106886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vizcaíno JA, Côté RG, Csordas A, Dianes JA, Fabregat A, Foster JM, Griss J, Alpi E, Birim M, Contell J, O’Kelly G, Schoenegger A, Ovelleiro D, Pérez-Riverol Y, Reisinger F, Ríos D, Wang R, Hermjakob H (2013) The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 41(Database issue):D1063–D1069PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang X, Sakata K, Komatsu S (2018) An integrated approach of proteomics and computational genetic modification effectiveness analysis to uncover the mechanisms of flood tolerance in soybeans. Int J Mol Sci 19:5Google Scholar
  40. Xue Y, Liu Z, Gao X, Jin C, Wen L, Yao X, Ren J (2010) GPS-SNO: computational prediction of protein S-nitrosylation sites with a modified GPS algorithm. PLoS One 5:e11290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zaffagnini M, De Mia M, Morisse S, Di Giacinto N, Marchand CH, Maes A, Lemaire SD, Trost P (2016) Protein S-nitrosylation in photosynthetic organisms: a comprehensive overview with future perspectives. Biochim Biophys Acta 1864:952–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.National Institute of Crop ScienceTsukubaJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of Environmental and Information SciencesFukui University of TechnologyFukuiJapan

Personalised recommendations