Plant Molecular Biology Reporter

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 399–405 | Cite as

Identification of Early Vigor QTLs and QTL by Environment Interactions in Wheat (Triticum eastivum L.)

  • Habtamu AyalewEmail author
  • Hui Liu
  • Chunji Liu
  • Guijun YanEmail author
Original Paper


Crop productivity is highly dependent on successful seed germination and seedling establishment. This study evaluated two mapping populations, Batavia/Ernie (double haploid) and Synthetic/Opata (recombinant inbred lines), for early vigor under water stress and normal growing conditions. Significant gene, environment (water), and gene by environment interaction effects were observed. Broad sense heritability was 29 and 40% for the Batavia/Ernie and Synthetic/Opata populations, respectively. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) were analyzed based on single and multienvironment models. The two mapping populations differed in the number and locations of QTLs except qNev.uwa.4AL was identified in both populations under the non-stress condition, while qSev.uwa.3BL was specifically expressed under the stress condition in the Synthetic/Opata population. QTL by environment interaction (QEI) enabled identification of nine QTLs, including those identified by the single environment approach. Phenotypic variation expression (PVE) of QEIs ranged from 4.8 to 14.9% across the populations. Larger proportion of PVE of QEIs was explained by the additive components. Favorable alleles for three of the QTLs identified in the Synthetic/Opata population were derived from Synthetic, while Batavia contributed favorable alleles to a QTL on the long arm of chromosome 1D in the Batavia/Ernie population. QTL detected under water stress (qSev.uwa.3BL) co-located with the DREB 1 gene, which was mapped between markers Xmwg818 and Xfbb117 (58.1–77.6 cM). QTLs with high proportion of additive components can be validated for marker assisted gene pyramiding and selection.


Biomass accumulation Crop establishment Early vigour Water stress QEI 



The Australian Development Scholarship (ADS) sponsored the study of the first author.


  1. Abdel-Ghani A, Neumann K, Wabila C, Sharma R, Dhanagond S, Owais S, Börner A, Graner A, Kilian B (2015) Diversity of germination and seedling traits in a spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) collection under drought simulated conditions. Genet Resour Crop Evol 62:275–292. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson JA, Wingen LU, Griffiths M, Pound MP, Gaju O, Foulkes MJ, Le Gouis J, Griffiths S, Bennett MJ, King J, Wells DM (2015) Phenotyping pipeline reveals major seedling root growth QTL in hexaploid wheat. J Exp Bot 66:2283–2292. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayalew H, Dessalegn T, Liu H, Yan G (2016) Performance of Ethiopian bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under contrasting water regimes: potential sources of variability for drought resistance breeding. Aus J Crop Sci 10:370–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayalew H, Liu H, Yan G (2017) Identification and validation of root length QTLs for water stress resistance in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 213:126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayalew H, Ma X, Yan G (2015) Screening wheat (Triticum spp.) genotypes for root length under contrasting water regimes: potential sources of variability for drought resistance breeding. J Agron Crop Sci 201:189–194. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ayalew H, Wondale L, Teshager A (2014) GGE biplot analysis on the performance of wheat genotype for hectolitre weight and mega environments identification in north western Ethiopia. Aust J Crop Sci 8:1435Google Scholar
  7. Blum A (2005) Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Aust J Agric Res 56:1159–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blum A (2011) Plant breeding for water-limited environments. Springer, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blum A, Sinmena B, Ziv O (1980) An evaluation of seed and seedling drought tolerance screening-tests in wheat. Euphytica 29:727–736. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breseghello F, Sorrells ME (2007) QTL analysis of kernel size and shape in two hexaploid wheat mapping populations. Field Crop Res 101:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck FW, Mazzucotelli E, Mastrangelo AM, Francia E, Mare C, Tondelli A, Stanca AM (2008) Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crop Res 105:1–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chloupek O, Dostal V, Streda T, Psota V, Dvorackova O (2010) Drought tolerance of barley varieties in relation to their root system size. Plant Breed 129:630–636. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crossa J, Burgueno J, Dreisigacker S, Vargas M, Herrera-Foessel SA, Lillemo M, Singh RP, Trethowan R, Warburton M, Franco J, Reynolds M, Crouch JH, Ortiz R (2007) Association analysis of historical bread wheat germplasm using additive genetic covariance of relatives and population structure. Genetics 177:1889–1913. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Crossa J, de Los Campos G, Pérez P, Gianola D, Burgueño J, Araus JL, Makumbi D, Singh RP, Dreisigacker S, Yan J (2010) Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics 186:713–724CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. CTA. 1989. Wheat in the tropics : a growing demand. . Spore 20Google Scholar
  16. Ehdaie B, Merhaut DJ, Ahmadian S, Hoops AC, Khuong T, Layne AP, Waines JG (2010) Root system size influences water-nutrient uptake and nitrate leaching potential in wheat. J Agron Crop Sci 196:455–466. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. El-Soda M, Malosetti M, Zwaan BJ, Koornneef M, Aarts MG (2014) Genotype× environment interaction QTL mapping in plants: lessons from Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci 19:390–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellis RH (1992) Seed and seedling vigour in relation to crop growth and yield. Plant Growth Regul 11:249–255. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fakorede MAB, Ojo DK (1981) Variability for seedling vigour in maize. Exp Agric 17:195–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farooq S, Shahid M, Khan MB, Hussain M, Farooq M (2015) Improving the productivity of bread wheat by good management practices under terminal drought. J Agron Crop Sci 201:173–188. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fleury D, Jefferies S, Kuchel H, Langridge P (2010) Genetic and genomic tools to improve drought tolerance in wheat. J Exp Bot 61:3211–3222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gomez SM, Boopathi NM, Kumar SS, Ramasubramanian T, Chengsong Z, Jeyaprakash P, Senthil A, Babu RC (2010) Molecular mapping and location of QTLs for drought-resistance traits in indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) lines adapted to target environments. Acta Physiol Plant 32:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heslot N, Akdemir D, Sorrells ME, Jannink J-L (2014) Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions. Theor Appl Genet 127:463–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hickey, L., C. Van-Lane, H. Robinson, I. Godwin and A. Borrell (2017) Variation for early vigour in commercial barley varieties. Grains Research and Development CorporationGoogle Scholar
  25. Jiang Y, Wang X, Yu X, Zhao X, Luo N, Pei Z, Liu H, Garvin DF (2017) Quantitative trait loci associated with drought tolerance in Brachypodium distachyon. Front Plant Sci 8:811CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Khan N, Kazmi RH, Willems LAJ, van Heusden AW, Ligterink W, Hilhorst HWM (2012) Exploring the natural variation for seedling traits and their link with seed dimensions in tomato. PLoS One 7:e43991. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Li HB, Xie GQ, Ma J, Liu GR, Wen SM, Ban T, Chakraborty S, Liu CJ (2010) Genetic relationships between resistances to Fusarium head blight and crown rot in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 121:941–950. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Li X-M, Chen X-M, Xiao Y-G, Xia X-C, Wang D-S, He Z-H, Wang H-J (2014) Identification of QTLs for seedling vigor in winter wheat. Euphytica 198:199–209. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lilley JM, Kirkegaard JA (2011) Benefits of increased soil exploration by wheat roots. Field Crop Res 122:118–130. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahender A, Anandan A, Pradhan S (2015) Early seedling vigour, an imperative trait for direct-seeded rice: an overview on physio-morphological parameters and molecular markers. Planta 241:1027–1050CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Maydup ML, Graciano C, Guiamet JJ, Tambussi EA (2012) Analysis of early vigour in twenty modern cultivars of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop Pastur Sci 63:987–996. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nyquist WE (1991) Estimation of heritability and prediction of selection response in plant-populations. Crit Rev Plant Sci 10:235–322. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palta JA, Chen X, Milroy SP, Rebetzke GJ, Dreccer MF, Watt M (2011) Large root systems: are they useful in adapting wheat to dry environments? Funct Plant Biol 38:347. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  35. Rebetzke GJ, Richards RA (1999) Genetic improvement of early vigour in wheat. Aust J Agric Res 50:291–302. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rebolledo MC, Dingkuhn M, Courtois B, Gibon Y, Clément-Vidal A, Cruz DF, Duitama J, Lorieux M, Luquet D (2015) Phenotypic and genetic dissection of component traits for early vigour in rice using plant growth modelling, sugar content analyses and association mapping. J Exp Bot 66:5555–5566. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Romagosa, I. and P.N. Fox (1993) Genotype-environment interactions and adaptation. In: Hayward MD, Bosenmark NO, Romagosa I (eds) Plant breeding: principles and prospects. Chapman and Hall p 373–390Google Scholar
  38. Ryan PR, Liao M, Delhaize E, Rebetzke GJ, Weligama C, Spielmeyer W, James RA (2015) Early vigour improves phosphate uptake in wheat. J Exp Bot 66:7089–7100. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Szira F, Balint AF, Borner A, Galiba G (2008) Evaluation of drought-related traits and screening methods at different developmental stages in spring barley. J Agron Crop Sci 194:334–342. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tanaka A, Takahashi K, Masutomi Y, Hanasaki N, Hijioka Y, Shiogama H, Yamanaka Y (2015) Adaptation pathways of global wheat production: importance of strategic adaptation to climate change. Sci Rep 5Google Scholar
  41. Tardif G, Kane NA, Adam H, Labrie L, Major G, Gulick P, Sarhan F, Laliberté J-F (2007) Interaction network of proteins associated with abiotic stress response and development in wheat. Plant Mol Biol 63:703–718. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Trachsel S, Sun D, SanVicente FM, Zheng H, Atlin GN, Suarez EA, Babu R, Zhang X (2016) Identification of QTL for early vigor and stay-green conferring tolerance to drought in two connected advanced backcross populations in tropical maize (Zea mays L.). PLoS One 11:e0149636. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Tuberosa R (2012) Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era. Front Physiol 3:347. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Voorrips RE (2002) MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered 93:77–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang, J., H. Li, L. Zhang and L. Meng (2016) Users’ manual of QTL icimapping version 4.1. Intigrated Software for Linkage Analysis and Genetic Mapping in Biparental Populations. The Quantitative Genetics Group, Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100081, China, and Genetic Resources Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico, D.F., MexicoGoogle Scholar
  46. Wei B, Jing R, Wang C, Chen J, Mao X, Chang X, Jia J (2009) Dreb1 genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): development of functional markers and gene mapping based on SNPs. Mol Breed 23:13–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Williams K, Sorrells ME (2014) Three-dimensional seed size and shape QTL in hexaploid wheat (L.) populations. Crop Sci 54:98–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson PB, Rebetzke GJ, Condon AG (2015) Pyramiding greater early vigour and integrated transpiration efficiency in bread wheat; trade-offs and benefits. Field Crop Res 183:102–110. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yan W, Tinker NA (2006) Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: principles and applications. Can J Plant Sci 86:623–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang, L., R. Richards, A. Condon, D. Liu and G. Rebetzke (2014) Recurrent selection for wider seedling leaves increases early biomass and leaf area in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Exp Bot: eru468Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Noble Research Institute LLCAdmoreUSA
  2. 2.School of Agriculture and Environment, Faculty of Science, and The Institute of AgricultureThe University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  3. 3.CSIRO Agriculture & FoodSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations