Effects of morphology and stand structure on root biomass and length differed between absorptive and transport roots in temperate trees
- 6 Downloads
Absorptive and transport roots (diameter ≤ 2 mm) are closely related to soil resource uptake for plant growth, carbon budget and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems, but how and why the relative share of root biomass or root length for both root functional types changes with tree species is not well understood. Our aims were to examine the inter-specific variations of root biomass and length per unit area of absorptive and transport roots, and their relationships with stand structure and soil characteristics, root morphological and architectural traits.
We measured root biomass and length per unit area, diameter, specific root length (SRL), root tissue density (RTD), and branching ratio of the first five order roots, stand and soil characteristics in seven forests consisting of different tree species at a common site. The first order roots were classified as absorptive roots and the other orders as transport roots based on our earlier work.
Biomass ratios of absorptive to transport roots varied from 1:5.56 to 1:1.12 among species, and length ratios ranged from 1:1.56 to 1:0.29. Root biomass was not influenced by root morphology or architecture, nor by stand or soil characteristics. Absorptive root length was significantly correlated with SRL, RTD, and branching ratio of the first to second order roots among species, whereas transport root length was significantly correlated with stem density.
The relative share of biomass and length for absorptive and transport roots differed among tree species, which may influence belowground carbon allocation and resource competition.
KeywordsAbsorptive roots Fine root Nutrient forage strategy Root biomass Root order
Specific root length
Root tissue density
We thank Lijuan Xiao, Zhendong Ma for assistance on field work. We also thank Catherine Dandie, PhD, for editing the English text of an earlier draft of this manuscript. We especially appreciate two anonymous reviewers and the editor for comments that improved this article. This research was jointly supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2572018BA11), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870608 and 31100470), and the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (No. C2016004).
- Bauhus J, Messier C (1999) Soil exploitation strategies of fine roots in different tree species of the southern boreal forest of eastern Canada. Can J For Res 29:260–273Google Scholar
- Finér L, Helmisaari H-S, Lõhmus K, Majdi H, Brunner I, Børja I, Eldhuset T, Godbold D, Grebenc T, Konôpka B, Kraigher H, Möttönen MR, Ohashi M, Oleksyn J, Ostonen I, Uri V, Vanguelova E (2007) Variation in fine root biomass of three European tree species: beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies L. karst.), and scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Plant Biosystems 141:394–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gong ZT, Chen ZC, Luo GB, Zhang GL, Zhao WJ (1999) Soil reference with Chinese soil taxonomy. Soils 31:57–63Google Scholar
- Guo DL, Li HB, Mitchell RJ, Han W, Hendricks JJ, Fahey TJ, Hendrick RL (2008a) Fine root heterogeneity by branch order: exploring the discrepancy in root turnover estimates between minirhizotron and carbon isotopic methods. New Phytol 177(2):443–456Google Scholar
- Su Y, Li XW, Liu YK, Li JF, Yin HF, Wang ZN (2015) Fine root morphology and biomass characteristics at preliminary stage of gap border trees of reformed low beneficial Cupressus funebris forests. Acta Bot Boreal–Occident Sin 35:0587–0593Google Scholar
- Wang ZH, Li RX, Guan QW (2013b) Effects of thinning on fine-root morphology, biomass and N concentration of different branch orders of Chinese fir. Chinese J Appl Ecol 24:1487–1493Google Scholar
- Xu T, Wang HT, Zhu WR, Wang YP, Li CR, Jiang YZ (2015) Morphological and anatomical traits of poplar fine roots in successive rotation plantations. Sci Silvae Sinicae 51:119–126Google Scholar