Advertisement

Ruzigrass root persistence and soybean root growth

  • Ciro A. RosolemEmail author
  • Leontino Oliveira Neto
  • Vladimir E. Costa
  • Camila da Silva Grassmann
Regular Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Aims

Cropping systems using forage grasses as cover crops have been effective in soil conservation and nutrient cycling, but root persistence of ruzigrass (Urochloa ruziziensis) is significant, and may impair root growth of the next crop. However, it is unknown how this would interfere with soybean root growth and yield under field conditions.

Methods

Ruzigrass root persistence during soybean development, and its effects on soybean yield were studied under field conditions. Ruzigrass and soybean were grown alone or in rotation, and roots were sampled every 30 days and evaluated using carbon isotope discrimination.

Results

Despite temporary impairment of soybean root growth in the uppermost soil layer, there was no effect of ruzigrass on soybean yield. The ruzigrass root decay rate was high in the first 30 days after desiccation, and then it slowed down. Soybean roots grew slowly up to 30 days after planting (DAP, V7) and then peaked at 90 DAP (R5).

Conclusions

Soybean root growth and yield are not affected by decaying ruzigrass roots. Around 50% of the ruzigrass roots are mineralized before soybean flowering. However, by soybean harvest there are still from 25 to 28% of non-decomposed ruzigrass roots up to the soil depth of 0.20 m.

Keywords

Cropping system Soybean Ruzigrass Roots Crop rotation 

Abbreviations

DAP

Days After Planting

C/N ratio

Carbon/Nitrogen ratio

Notes

References

  1. Abiven S, Recous S, Reyes V, Oliver R (2005) Mineralization of C and N from root, stem and leaf residues in soil and role of their biochemical quality. Biol Fertil Soils 42:119–128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-005-0006-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison LE (1966) The fate of nitrogen applied to soils. Adv Agron 18:219–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60651-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boutton TW (1991) Stable carbon isotope ratios of natural materials: II. Atmospheric, terrestrial, marine, and freshwater environments. In: Coleman DC, Fry B (eds) Carbon isotope techniques. Academic Press, New York, pp 173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calonego JC, Rosolem CA (2010) Soybean root growth and yield in rotation with cover crops under chiseling and no-till. Eur J Agron 33:242–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camin F, Bontempo L, Perini M, Piasentier E (2016) Stable isotope ratio analysis for assessing the authenticity of food of animal origin. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 15:868–877.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castoldi G, Reis JG, Pivetta LA, Rosolem CA (2013) Soil nitrogen dynamics after brachiarias desiccation. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 37:1620–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castoldi G, Pivetta LA, Rosolem CA (2014) Nitrogen budget in a soil-plat system after brachiarias grass desiccation. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 60:162–172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2013.878641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castro GSA, Crusciol CAC, Calonego JC, Rosolem CA (2015) Management impacts on soil organic matter of tropical soils. Vadose Zone J 14:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2014.07.0093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ducatti C (2007) Aplicação dos isótopos estáveis em aqüicultura. R Bras Zootec 36:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Echer FR, Castro GSA, Bogiani JC, Rosolem CA (2012) Crescimento inicial e absorção de nutrientes pelo algodoeiro cultivado sobre a palhada de Brachiaria ruziziensis. Planta Daninha 30:783–790.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582012000400012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eleki K, Cruse RM, Albrecht KA (2005) Root segregation of C3 and C4 species using carbon isotope composition. Crop Sci 45:879–882.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elger C, Simonetti APMM (2013) Influência da palhada de Brachiaria brizanta sobre a germinação e desenvolvimento inicial da cultura de soja. Cultivando o Saber 6:81–88Google Scholar
  13. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:503–537.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franchini JC, Balbinot AA Jr, Debiasi H, Nepomuceno AL (2017) Root growth of soybean cultivars under diferent water availability conditions. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 38:715–724.  https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n2p715 Google Scholar
  15. Gealy DR, Fischer AJ (2010) C-13 discrimination: a stable isotope method to quantify root interactions between C-3 rice (Oryza sativa) and C-4 barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in flooded fields. Weed Sci 58:359–368.  https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-09-00053.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregory PJ (2006) Plant roots: growth, activity and interaction with soils. Blackwell, Oxford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Häussler K, Rao IM, Schultze-Kraft R, Marschner H (2006) Shoot and root growth of two tropical grasses, Brachiaria ruziziensis and B. dictyoneura, as influenced by aluminium toxicity and phosphorus deficiency in a sandy loam Oxisol of the eastern plains of Colombia. Tropical Grasslands 40:213–221 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/44093 Google Scholar
  18. Hungria M, Vargas MAT (2000) Environmental factors affecting N2 fixation in grain legumes in the tropics, with an emphasis on Brazil. Field Crop Res 65:151–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00084-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jawson MD, Elliott LF (1986) Carbon and nitrogen transformations during wheat straw and root decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 18:15–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(86)90097-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li Q, Li B, Kronzucker HJ, Shi W (2010) Root growth inhibition by NH4 + efflux and GMPase activity. Plant Cell Environ 33:1529–1542.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02162.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mitchell RL, Russel WJ (1971) Root development and rooting patterns of soybean evaluated under field conditions. Agron J 63:312–316.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1971.00021962006300020034x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ortez OA, Salvagiotti F, Enrico PVV et al (2018) Exploring nitrogen limitation for historical and modern soybean genotypes. Agron J 110:2080–2090.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.04.0271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Perkons U, Kauts T, Uteau D et al (2014) Root-length densities of various annual crops following crops with contrasting root systems. Soil Till Res 137:50–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pires FR, Assis RL, Procópio SO et al (2008) Manejo de plantas de cobertura antecessoras à cultura da soja em plantio direto. Revista Ceres 55:094–101Google Scholar
  25. Pivetta LA, Castoldi G, Santos GP, Rosolem CA (2011) Crescimento e atividade de raízes de soja em função do sistema de produção. Pesq Agrop Brasileira 46:1547–1554.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2011001100017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Primrose S, Woolfe M, Rollinson S (2010) Food forensics: methods for determining the authenticity of foodstuffs. Trends Food Sci Technol 21:582–590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2010.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raphael JPA, Calonego JC, Milori DMBP, Rosolem CA (2016) Soil organic matter in crop rotations under no-till. Soil Till Res 155:45–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still2015.07.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosolem CA, Calonego JC, Foloni JSS (2003) Lixiviação de potássio da palha de espécies de cobertura de solo de acordo com a quantidade de chuva aplicada. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 27:355–362.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832003000200015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosolem CA, Werle R, Garcia RA (2010) Nitrogen washing from C3 and C4 cover grass residues by rain. R Bras Ci Solo 34:1899–1905.  https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v4n9p126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosolem CA, Steiner F, Zoca SM, Ducatti C (2012) Nitrogen immobilization by Congo grass roots impairs cotton initial growth. J Agric Sci 4:126–136Google Scholar
  31. Salvagiotti F, Cassman KG, Specht JE, Walters DT, Weiss A, Dobermann A (2008) Nitrogen uptake, fixation and response to fertilizer N in soybeans: a review. F Crop Res 108:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2008.03.001
  32. Sartori GM, Marchesan E, David R et al (2016) Growth and development of soybean roots according to planting management systems and irrigation in lowland areas. Ciência Rural 46:1572–1578.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20151579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. SAS Institute Inc (2009) The SAS system for windows. SAS 9. SAS Inst, Cary, NC, p 2Google Scholar
  34. Smith BN, Epstein S (1971) Two categories of 13C/12C ratios for higher plants. Plant Physiol 47:380–384, 1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Soil Survey Staff (2014) Keys to soil taxonomy, twelfth ed. USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  36. Somda ZC, Ford PB, Hargrove WL (1991) Decomposition and nitrogen recycling of cover crops and crop residues. In: Cover crops for clean water, Ankeny, 1991. Proceedings. Ankeny, Soil Conservation Society of America pp103–105Google Scholar
  37. Souza Filho APS, Pereira AAG, Bayma JC (2005) Aleloquímico produzido pela gramínea forrageira Brachiaria humidicola. Planta Daninha 23:25–32.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582005000100004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Souza EFC, Fernandes AM, Souza-Schlick GD, Rosolem CA (2014) Early growth of common bean cropped over ruzigrass residues. Planta Daninha 32:775–781.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582014000400012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Subbarao GV, Nakahara K, Hurtado MP, Ono H, Moreta DE, Salcedo AF, Yoshihashi AT, Ishikawa T, Ishitani M, Ohnishi-Kameyama M, Yoshida M, Rondon M, Rao IM, Lascano CE, Berry WL, Ito O (2009) Evidence for biological nitrification inhibition in Brachiaria pastures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:17302–17307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tanaka RT, Mascarenhas HAA (1995) Desenvolvimento do sistema radicular da soja em sucessão à crotalária. Bragantia 54:161–167.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87051995000100018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trinsoutrot I, Recous S, Bentz B, Linières M, Cheneby D, Nicolardot B (2000) Biochemical quality of crop residues and carbon and nitrogen mineralization kinetics under nonlimiting nitrogen conditions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:918–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Urquiaga S, Cadish G, Alves BJR et al (1998) Influence of decomposition of roots of tropical forage species on the availability of soil nitrogen. Soil Biol Biochem 30:2099–2106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00086-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Agronomy, Department of Crop ScienceSão Paulo State UniversityBotucatuBrazil
  2. 2.Stable Isotope CenterSão Paulo State UniversityBotucatuBrazil

Personalised recommendations