Ruzigrass root persistence and soybean root growth
- 12 Downloads
Cropping systems using forage grasses as cover crops have been effective in soil conservation and nutrient cycling, but root persistence of ruzigrass (Urochloa ruziziensis) is significant, and may impair root growth of the next crop. However, it is unknown how this would interfere with soybean root growth and yield under field conditions.
Ruzigrass root persistence during soybean development, and its effects on soybean yield were studied under field conditions. Ruzigrass and soybean were grown alone or in rotation, and roots were sampled every 30 days and evaluated using carbon isotope discrimination.
Despite temporary impairment of soybean root growth in the uppermost soil layer, there was no effect of ruzigrass on soybean yield. The ruzigrass root decay rate was high in the first 30 days after desiccation, and then it slowed down. Soybean roots grew slowly up to 30 days after planting (DAP, V7) and then peaked at 90 DAP (R5).
Soybean root growth and yield are not affected by decaying ruzigrass roots. Around 50% of the ruzigrass roots are mineralized before soybean flowering. However, by soybean harvest there are still from 25 to 28% of non-decomposed ruzigrass roots up to the soil depth of 0.20 m.
KeywordsCropping system Soybean Ruzigrass Roots Crop rotation
Days After Planting
- C/N ratio
- Elger C, Simonetti APMM (2013) Influência da palhada de Brachiaria brizanta sobre a germinação e desenvolvimento inicial da cultura de soja. Cultivando o Saber 6:81–88Google Scholar
- Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 40:503–537. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Häussler K, Rao IM, Schultze-Kraft R, Marschner H (2006) Shoot and root growth of two tropical grasses, Brachiaria ruziziensis and B. dictyoneura, as influenced by aluminium toxicity and phosphorus deficiency in a sandy loam Oxisol of the eastern plains of Colombia. Tropical Grasslands 40:213–221 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/44093 Google Scholar
- Mitchell RL, Russel WJ (1971) Root development and rooting patterns of soybean evaluated under field conditions. Agron J 63:312–316. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1971.00021962006300020034x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pires FR, Assis RL, Procópio SO et al (2008) Manejo de plantas de cobertura antecessoras à cultura da soja em plantio direto. Revista Ceres 55:094–101Google Scholar
- Rosolem CA, Steiner F, Zoca SM, Ducatti C (2012) Nitrogen immobilization by Congo grass roots impairs cotton initial growth. J Agric Sci 4:126–136Google Scholar
- Salvagiotti F, Cassman KG, Specht JE, Walters DT, Weiss A, Dobermann A (2008) Nitrogen uptake, fixation and response to fertilizer N in soybeans: a review. F Crop Res 108:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2008.03.001
- SAS Institute Inc (2009) The SAS system for windows. SAS 9. SAS Inst, Cary, NC, p 2Google Scholar
- Soil Survey Staff (2014) Keys to soil taxonomy, twelfth ed. USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Somda ZC, Ford PB, Hargrove WL (1991) Decomposition and nitrogen recycling of cover crops and crop residues. In: Cover crops for clean water, Ankeny, 1991. Proceedings. Ankeny, Soil Conservation Society of America pp103–105Google Scholar
- Subbarao GV, Nakahara K, Hurtado MP, Ono H, Moreta DE, Salcedo AF, Yoshihashi AT, Ishikawa T, Ishitani M, Ohnishi-Kameyama M, Yoshida M, Rondon M, Rao IM, Lascano CE, Berry WL, Ito O (2009) Evidence for biological nitrification inhibition in Brachiaria pastures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:17302–17307CrossRefGoogle Scholar