Plant and Soil

, Volume 442, Issue 1–2, pp 311–321 | Cite as

Shrub patches capture tumble plants: potential evidence for a self-reinforcing pattern in a semiarid shrub encroached grassland

  • Yuchun YanEmail author
  • Dawei Xu
  • Xingliang Xu
  • Deli Wang
  • Xu Wang
  • Yurong Cai
  • Jinqiang Chen
  • Xiaoping XinEmail author
  • David J Eldridge
Regular Article


Background and aims

The development of fertile patches within an infertile matrix is a common phenomenon in drylands. Shrub-centered expansion of fertile islands is generally attributed to processes of sediment erosion and deposition, but there have been fewer studies of how litter might contribute to the development of fertile islands in semiarid shrub grassland.


We quantified the capture of two tumble plant species (Cleistogenes squarrosa, Salsola collina; also known as tumble weeds) by shrubs across ten sites across 38,000 km2 of a semiarid grassland encroached by Caragana microphylla.


Tumble plants are plants that blow across the grassland propelled by strong winds. Both tumble plant species were found over extensive areas of semiarid grassland, and their distribution coincides with the distribution of Caragana microphylla. Biomass production of both tumble plants averaged 12.2 g m−2 (range: 1.0 to 25.0 g m−2) and litter accumulation (amount accruing from wind-blown plants) of both tumble plants was significantly greater beneath shrubs (94.5 ± 28.9 g m−2 mean ± SE) than in the interspaces (3.3 ± 1.4 g m−2). Most of the material collecting under Caragana microphylla comprised tumble plants. Increases in the area of Caragana microphylla patches did not correspond to greater tumble plant capture. However, the supply of tumble plants was the strongest predictor of capture within shrub hummocks, suggesting that tumble plant capture is source limited rather than sink limited. Our structural equation model indicates that increases in grass cover and height were indirectly and negatively associated with tumble plant capture by reducing the tumble plant supply. Contrary to prediction, shrub height and shrub patch area had no overall effect on the tumble plant capture.


Overall, we maintain that the capture of tumble plants by shrubs is an important self-maintaining mechanism of shrub-encroached grasslands. Tumble plant abundance is predicted to increase with increasing surface human disturbance and aridity. Therefore, the “shrub-litter island” effect is likely to be an important mechanism for maintaining and promoting the encroachment of shrubs into semiarid grasslands.


Fertile island Shrub Temperate grassland Tumble plants Encroachment 



This study was partially funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41671044), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0500603, 2017YFE0104500), Fundamental Research Funds for Central Nonprofit Scientific Institution (931-8), and Special Funding for the Modern Agricultural Technology System of the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture.

Supplementary material

11104_2019_4189_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (112 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 112 kb)


  1. Baker DV, Beck KG, Bienkiewicz BJ, Bjostad LB (2008) Forces necessary to initiate dispersal for three tumbleweeds. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1:59–65. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bochet E, Rubio JL, Poesen J (1999) Modified topsoil islands within patchy Mediterranean vegetation in SE Spain. CATENA 38:23–44. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borger CPD, Walsh M, Scott JK, Powles SB (2007) Tumbleweeds in the Western Australian cropping system: seed dispersal characteristics of Salsola australis. Weed Res 47:406–414. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cerdà A (1997) The effect of patchy distribution of Stipa tenacissima L. on runoff and erosion. J Arid Environ 36:37–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dan MC, Yang J, Hou H, Zhang LX, Song BY (2015) Effects of simulated warming and precipitation enhancement on litter decomposition of Stipa krylovii steppe Chinese. J Agrometeorol 36:746–754Google Scholar
  6. D'Odorico P, Fuentes JD, Pockman WT, Collins SL, He Y, Medeiros JS, DeWekker S, Litvak ME (2010) Positive feedback between microclimate and shrub encroachment in the northern Chihuahuan desert. Ecosphere 1:1–11. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. D'Odorico P, He Y, Collins S, De Wekker SFJ, Engel V, Fuentes JD (2013) Vegetation–microclimate feedbacks in woodland–grassland ecotones. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:364–379. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eldridge DJ, Bowker MA, Maestre FT, Roger E, Reynolds JF, Whitford WG (2011) Impacts of shrub encroachment on ecosystem structure and functioning: towards a global synthesis. Ecol Lett 14:709–722. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans RA, Young JA (1972) Microsite requirements for establishment of annual rangeland weeds. Weed Sci 20:350–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fahnestock JT, Povirk KL, Welker JM (2000) Ecological significance of litter redistribution by wind and snow in arctic landscapes. Ecography 23:623–631. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Field JP, Breshears DD, Whicker JJ, Zou CB (2012) Sediment capture by vegetation patches: implications for desertification and increased resource redistribution. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 117:G01033. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grace JB (2006) Structural equation modelling and natural systems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He Y, D'Odorico P, De Wekker SF (2015) The role of vegetation-microclimate feedback in promoting shrub encroachment in the northern Chihuahuan desert. Glob Chang Biol 21:2141–2154. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jin Z, Qi Y, Yunshe D, Domroes M (2009) Seasonal patterns of soil respiration in three types of communities along grass-desert shrub transition in Inner Mongolia, China. Adv Atmos Sci 26:503–512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jin Z, Dong YS, Qi YC, Liu WG, An ZS (2013) Characterizing variations in soil particle-size distribution along a grass-desert shrub transition in the ordos plateau of inner mongolia, china. Land Degrad Dev 24:141–146. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumada S, Kawanishi T, Hayashi Y, Hamano H, Kawarasaki S, Aikawa SI, Takahashi N, Egashira Y, Tanouchi H, Kojima T, Kinnear A, Yamada K (2009) Effects of different mobilities of leaf and woody litters on litter carbon dynamics in arid ecosystems in Western Australia. Ecol Model 220:2792–2801. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leenders JK, Sterk G, Van Boxel JH (2011) Modelling wind-blown sediment transport around single vegetation elements. Earth Surf Process Land 36:1218–1229. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li XY, Zhang SY, Peng HY, HuX MYJ (2013) Soil water and temperature dynamics in shrub-encroached grasslands and climatic implications: results from inner Mongolia steppe ecosystem of North China. Agric For Meteorol 171-172:20–30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li H, Shen HH, Chen LY, Liu TY, Hu HF, Zhao X, Zhou LH, Zhang PJ, Fang JY (2016) Effects of shrub encroachment on soil organic carbon in global grasslands. Sci Rep 6(28974).
  20. Ludwig JA, Tongway DJ (1995) Spatial organisation of landscapes and its function in semi-arid woodlands, Australia. Landsc Ecol 10:51–63. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maestre FT, Bowker MA, Puche MD, Hinojosa MB, Martinez I, Garcia-Palacios P, Castillo AP, Soliveres S, Luzuriaga AL, Sanchez AM, Carreira JA, Gallardo A, Escudero A (2009) Shrub encroachment can reverse desertification in semi-arid Mediterranean grasslands. Ecol Lett 12:930–941. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Okin GS, Mladenov N, Wang L, Cassel D, Caylor KK, Ringrose S, Macko SA (2008) Spatial patterns of soil nutrients in two southern African savannas. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 113:G02011. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peng HY, Li XY, Li GY, Zhang ZH, Zhang SY, Li L, Zhao GQ, Jiang ZY, Ma YJ (2013) Shrub encroachment with increasing anthropogenic disturbance in the semiarid Inner Mongolian grasslands of China. Catena 109:39–48.
  24. Puigdefébregas J, Sanchez G (1996) Advances in hillslope processes. Wiley, Chichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Reid KD, Wilcox BP, Breshears DD, MacDonald L (1999) Runoff and erosion in a Piñon–Juniper woodland influence of vegetation patches. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1869–1879. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ridolfi L, Laio F, D’Odorico P (2008) Fertility island formation and evolution in dryland ecosystems. Ecol Soc 13(5).
  27. Rietkerk M, van de Koppel J (2008) Regular pattern formation in real ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 23:169–175. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schlesinger WH, Pilmanis AM (1998) Plant-soil interactions in deserts. Biogeochemistry 42:169–187. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schlesinger WH, Reynolds JF, Cunningham GL, Huenneke LF, Jarrell WM, Virginia RA, Whitford WG (1990) Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247:1043–1048. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schlesinger WH, Raikes JA, Hartley AE, Cross AF (1996) On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems. Ecology 77:364–374. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shen W, Lin Y, Jenerette GD, Wu J (2011) Blowing litter across a landscape: effects on ecosystem nutrient flux and implications for landscape management. Landsc Ecol 26:629–644. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stallings GP, Thill DC, Mallorysmith CA, Lass LW (1995) Plant movement and seed dispersal of Russian thistle (Salsola iberica). Weed Sci 43:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tai PD, Li PJ, Jai HY, Sun TH (2001) Fixation and ecological effects of artificial Hippophae rhamnoides boskage on wind-rolling plants in slop of refuse dump. J Appl Ecol 12:833–836Google Scholar
  34. Travers SK, Eldridge DJ (2015) Evidence for the spatial self-organisation of litter patches in a semi-arid woodland. Ecosystems 18:958–970. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vetaas OR (1992) Micro-site effects of trees and shrubs in dry savannas. J Veg Sci 3:337–344. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wali MK (1999) Ecological succession and the rehabilitation of disturbed terrestrial ecosystems. Plant Soil 213:195–220. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang XS (2018) Effects of different grassland utilization of there dominant plants in typical steppe. Masters Thesis, Inner Mongolia University
  38. Wang J, Yang C, Liu S (2002) A study of ecological significance of wind-rolling plants in steppe of middle reach of Xilin river. Grassl China 24:43–46Google Scholar
  39. Yan Y, Tang H (2008) The restoration of degraded grassland community by exclusion of livestock and its contribute to carbon sequestration in typical steppe of Inner Mongolia. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, 18: 56–551Google Scholar
  40. Yan Y, Xu X, Xin X, Yang G, Wang X, Yan R, Chen B (2011) Effect of vegetation coverage on aeolian dust accumulation in a semiarid steppe of northern China. Catena 87:351–356. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yan Y, Xin X, Xu X, Wang X, Yan R, Murray PJ (2016) Vegetation patches increase wind-blown litter accumulation in a semi-arid steppe of northern China. Environ Res Lett 11:124008. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yan Y, Yan R, Chen J, Xin X, Eldridge DJ, Shao C, Wang X, Lv S, Jin D, Chen J, Guo Z, Chen B, Xu L (2018) Grazing modulates soil temperature and moisture in a Eurasian steppe. Agric For Meteorol 262:157–165. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yin CJ, Huang DH, Chen ZZ (1994) Quantitative relationships between the litter decompostion of four species in Inner Mongolia grassland and climatic factors. Acta Ecol Sin 14:149–154Google Scholar
  44. Zhang TH, Su YZ, Cui JY, Zhang ZH, Chang XX (2006) A leguminous shrub (Caragana microphylla) in semiarid sandy soils of North China. Pedosphere 16:319–325. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhao YZ (2005) The distribution pattern and ecological adaptation of Caragana microphylla, C. davazamcii and C. korshinskii. Acta Ecol Sin 25:3411–3414Google Scholar
  46. Zhu TC (1959) Ecological characteristics of tumble grass. Biology Teaching 10:8–11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuchun Yan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dawei Xu
    • 1
  • Xingliang Xu
    • 2
  • Deli Wang
    • 3
  • Xu Wang
    • 1
  • Yurong Cai
    • 1
  • Jinqiang Chen
    • 1
  • Xiaoping Xin
    • 1
    Email author
  • David J Eldridge
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional PlanningChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Institute of Grassland ScienceNortheast Normal UniversityChangchunChina
  4. 4.Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations