Advertisement

Long-term rice-rice-rape rotation optimizes 1,2-benzenediol concentration in rhizosphere soil and improves nitrogen-use efficiency and rice growth

  • Sheng Lu
  • Haixing Song
  • Chunyun Guan
  • Joe Eugene Lepo
  • Zhimin Wu
  • Xinhua HeEmail author
  • Zhenhua ZhangEmail author
Regular Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

Aims

We examined differences in soil metabolites from the rice root rhizosphere of long-term rice-rice-fallow (RRF) and rice-rice-rape (RRR) rotations, and examined the effects of 1,2-benzenediol on nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) and rice growth.

Methods

The metabolite composition of rice rhizospheres was analyzed using the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A range of 0.2, 2.0 and 200 μmol L−1 concentrations of external 1,2-benzenediol were applied to examine their effects on rice growth, nitrate reductase (NR) and glutamine synthetase (GS) activities, and physiological nitrogen-use efficiency (PNUE).

Results

The metabolite composition of rhizospheres differed significantly between RRR and RRF. Soil total N and 1,2-benzenediol concentrations during the early rice season were significantly lower under RRR than RRF. Rice growth and NUE significantly enhanced at 0.20 μmol 1,2-benzenediol L−1, but inhibited at 2.0 μmol L−1 or higher. Changes in root morphology and uptake associated with 1,2-benzenediol possibly had contributed to a higher NUE of the early season rice under RRR. The NR and GS activities in rice roots were significantly higher with 0.2 μmol L−1 1,2-benzenediol than without 1,2-benzenediol treatment.

Conclusions

Crop rotation significantly affected rice rhizosphere metabolites. An optimal soil 1,2-benzenediol concentration under long-term RRR rotation may be associated with an enhanced NUE and root N uptake and assimilation, resulting in an increased rice growth and yield.

Keywords

Allelochemical metabolite Brassica napus Glutamine synthetase Nitrate reductase Oryza sativa 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFD0200100; 2017YFD0200104); National Natural Science Foundation of China (31101596, 31372130); Hunan Provincial Recruitment Program of Foreign Experts; the National Oilseed Rape Production Technology System of China; and the 2011 Plan of the Chinese Ministry of Education; and the Double First Class Construction Project of Hunan Agricultural University (kxk201801005).

Supplementary material

11104_2019_4177_MOESM1_ESM.docx (464 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 463 kb)

References

  1. Anderson JM, Park YI, Chow SW (1997) Photo inactivation and photo protection of photo system II in nature. Physiol Plant 100:214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bais HP, Walker TS, Stermitz FR, Hufbauer RA, Vivanco JM (2002) Enantiomeric dependent phytotoxic and antimicrobial activity of (2)-catechin; a rhizosecreted racemic mixture from spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa). Plant Physiol 128:1173–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao SD (2000) Analytical methods of soil agro-chemistry. China Agriculture Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. Bhandari DR, Wang Q, Friedt W, Spengler B, Gottwald S, Römpp A (2015) High resolution mass spectrometry imaging of plant tissues: towards a plant metabolite atlas. Analyst 140:7696–7709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bremner JM, Douglas LA (1971) Inhibition of urease activity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 3:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen W, Gong L, Guo Z, Wang W, Zhang H, Liu X, Yu S, Xiong L, Luo J (2013) A novel integrated method for large-scale detection, identification and quantification of widely-targeted metabolites: application in study of rice metabolomics. Mol Plant 6:1769–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan X, Jia L, Li Y, Smith SJ, Miller AJ, Shen Q (2007) Comparing nitrate storage and remobilization in two rice cultivars that differ in their nitrogen use efficiency. J Exp Bot 58:1729–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fitzgerald MA, Mccouch SR, Hall RD (2009) Not just a grain of rice: the quest for quality. Trends Plant Sci 14:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frank T, Scholz B, Peter S, Engel KH (2011) Metabolite profiling of barley: influence of the malting process. Food Chem 124:948–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao JS, Xu MG, Dong CH, Huang J, Cao WD, Zeng XB, Wen SL, Nie J (2013) Effects of long-term rice-rice-green manure cropping rotation on rice yield and soil fertility. Acta Agron Sin 39:343 in Chinese with English abstractCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glauser G, Marti G, Villard N, Doyen GA, Wolfender JL, Turlings TCJ, Erb M (2011) Induction and detoxification of maize 1,4-benzoxazin-3-ones by insect herbivores. Plant J 68:901–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gu Y, Chang ZZ, Yu JG, Zong LG (2013) Allelopathic effects of exogenous phenolic acids composted by wheat straw on seed germination and seedling growth of rice. Jiangsu J of Agr Sci 29:240–246 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  13. Huang GQ, Xiong YM, Qian HY, Wang SB, Liu LW, Zhao QG (2006) Ecological analysis on crop rotation systems of paddy field. Acta Ecol Sin 26:1159–1164 (in Chinese with English abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang SF, Wang CJZ, Shu CW, Zhou EX (2018) Cloning and expression analysis of rsphm gene in rhizoctonia solani ag-1, a of rice sheath blight pathogen. Chin J Rice Sci 32:111–118 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  15. Jom KN, Frank T, Engel KH (2011) A metabolite profiling approach to follow the sprouting process of mung beans (Vigna radiata). Metabolomics 7:102–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jose OS, Muraleedharan GN, Raymond H, Gene RS (1991) Significance of phenolic compounds in plant-soil-microbial systems. Crit Rev Plant Sci 10:63–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kato-Noguchi H, Ino T (2003) Rice seedlings release momilactone B into the environment. Phytochemistry 63:551–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu P, Zhao HJ, Wan SB, Jiang LH, Yu SF, Yang L, Wang YQ, Li J (2010) Autotoxic potential of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) root exudates. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences 32:431–435 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  19. Lu S, Zhang ZH (2018) Long-term rice-rice-rape rotation significantly improved soil structure and rice yield [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science 49(2):409–414 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  20. Lu S, Lepo JE, Song HX, Guan CY, Zhang ZH (2018) Increased rice yield in long-term crop rotation regimes through improved soil structure, rhizosphere microbial communities,and nutrient bioavailability in paddy soil. Biol Fert Soils 54:909–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mazzei L, Cianci M, Musiani F, Lente G, Palombo M, Ciurli S (2017) Inactivation of urease by catechol: kinetics and structure. J Inorg Biochem 166:182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mediene S, Valantin-Morison M, Sarthou JP, Tourdonnet SD, Gosme M, Bertrand M, Roger-Estrade J, Aubertot JN, Rusch A, Motisi N, Pelosi C, Dore T (2011) Agroecosystem management and biotic interactions: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 31:491–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olofsdotter M, Rebulanan M, Madrid A, Dali W, Navarez D, Olk DC (2002) Why phenolic acids are unlikely primary allelochemicals in rice. J Chem Ecol 28:229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Olsen RA, Brown JC, Benuen JH, Blume D (1982) Reduction of Fe3+ as it relates to Fe chlorosis. J Plant Nut 5:433–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Panesar BS, Fluck RC (1993) Energy productivity of a production system: analysis and measurement. Agric Syst 43:415–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Redinbaugh MG, Campbell WH (1998) Nitrate regulation of the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway in maize root plastids: induction of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase activity, protein and transcript levels. Plant Sci 134:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rice EL, Putnam AR, Tang CS (1986) Allelopathic growth stimulation. In: The science of Allelopathy. John Wiley& Sons, New York, pp 23–42Google Scholar
  28. Sato S, Soga T, Nishioka T, Tomita M (2004) Simultaneous determination of the main metabolites in rice leaves using capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry and capillary electrophoresis diode array detection. Plant J 40:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shepherd LVT, Alexander CA, Sungurtas JA, McNicol JW, Stewart D, Davies HV (2010) Metabolomic analysis of the potato tuber life cycle. Metabolomics 6:274–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shilling DG, Yoshiiawa FA (1987) Seeding bioassay for the study of allelopathy in allelochemicals role in agriculture and forestry, Waller GR, Ed.. ACS Symp. Ser no. 330. American chemical society. Chap, Washington, D.C, p 31Google Scholar
  31. Shu XL, Frank T, Shu QY, Engel KH (2008) Metabolite profiling of germinating rice seeds. J Agric Food Chem 56:11612–11620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Su W, Lu J, Wang W, Li X, Ren T, Cong R (2014) Influence of rice straw mulching on seed yield and nitrogen use efficiency of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) in intensive rice-oilseed rape cropping system. Field Crops Res 159:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Toyomasu T, Kagahara T, Okada K, Koga J, Hasegawa M, Mitsuhashi W, Sassa T, Yamane H (2008) Diterpene phytoalexins are biosynthesized in and exuded from the roots of rice seedlings. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 72:562–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Voorde TFJVD, Putten WHVD, Bezemer TM (2011) Intra-and interspecific plant-soil interactions, soil legacies and priority effects during old-field succession. J Ecol 99:945–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang H, Du NM (2006) Research and prospect of rice cropping system. Crop Res 5:498–503 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  36. Watanabe K, Teramoto M, Futamata H, Harayama S (1998) Molecular detection, isolation, and physiological characterization of functionally dominant phenol-degrading bacteria in activated sludge. Appl Environ Microb 64:4396–4402Google Scholar
  37. Wu CX, Li ZH, Shen YX (2007) Quantification and allelopathy potential of phenolic acids in aqueous extracts of legumes. Acta Agrestia Sintca 15:401–406 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  38. Wu F, Yang N, Toure A, Jin Z, Xu X (2013) Germinated brown rice and its role in human health. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 53:451–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yu YL, Xue LH, Yang LZ (2014) Winter legumes in rice crop rotations reduces nitrogen loss, and improves rice yield and soil nitrogen supply. Agron Sustain Dev 34:633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yuan DG, Wu JQ, Zhai HK, Wu QQ, Deng H, Xu GX, Luo Q, Wu DY, Wang CQ (2012) Activation effects of N, P, K fertilization and phenol on Si, AI, Fe in bleached paddy soil. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science 18:771–776 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  41. Zhang XX, Zhang RJ, Gao JS, Wang XC, Fan FL, Ma XT, Yin HQ, Zhang CW, Feng K, Deng Y (2017) Thirty-one years of rice-rice-green manure rotations shape the rhizosphere microbial community and enrich beneficial bacteria. Soil Biol Biochem 104:208–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhou BM, Cui MY, Song JJ, Liu JL, Huang W, Yu GL, Liu RQ (2011) Effect of 1,2-benzenediol on the utilization rate of nitrogen fertilizer and rice yield. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology 17:248–252 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southern Regional Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain and Oil Crops in China, College of Resources and Environmental SciencesHunan Agricultural UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.National Center of Oilseed Crops ImprovementChangshaChina
  3. 3.Center for Environmental Diagnostics and BioremediationUniversity of West FloridaPensacolaUSA
  4. 4.College of Natural Resources and EnvironmentSouthwest UniversityChongqingChina
  5. 5.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations