Phytomining to re-establish phosphorus-poor soil conditions for nature restoration on former agricultural land
- 78 Downloads
To restore species-rich grasslands on former agricultural land, typically phosphorus-poor soil conditions need to be re-established. Here we assess the potential of phosphorus extraction by biomass production, i.e. phytomining. We compare two techniques: (i) ‘mowing’, i.e. cutting and removing hay two or three times a year, and (ii) ‘P-mining’, i.e. mowing with yield maximization by adding growth-limiting nutrients other than phosphorus (i.e. nitrogen and potassium).
In a five-year field experiment at three fields situated along a soil phosphorus gradient, we studied phosphorus removal through both biomass assessment and changes in two soil phosphorus pools: bioavailable phosphorus (POlsen) and slowly cycling phosphorus (POxalate).
Phosphorus-mining doubled the phosphorus removal with biomass compared to mowing, and phosphorus removal with biomass was lower at fields with an initially lower concentration of POlsen in the soil. The POlsen concentrations decreased significantly during the experiment with the largest decreases in phosphorus-rich plots. Changes in the POlsen and POxalate stocks were correlated with the amount of phosphorus removed with biomass.
Phosphorus-mining effectively increases phosphorus removal compared to mowing, but becomes less efficient with decreasing soil phosphorus concentrations. Restoring phosphorus-poor soil conditions on formerly fertilized land remains a challenge: phytomining most often needs a long-term commitment.
KeywordsAbiotic ecological restoration Phytoextraction Bioavailable phosphorus Mowing P-mining Species-rich grassland
Sodium bicarbonate-extractable soil P
Ammonium-oxalate-extractable soil P
Ammonium-lactate-extractable soil P
Total soil P
Change in POlsen between 2011 and 2017
Change in POxalate between 2011 and 2017
Phosphorus nutrition index
Nitrogen nutrition index
Potassium nutrition index
We are grateful for the admission to conduct our field experiment in Landschap De Liereman (Natuurpunt): the cooperation with the people of Natuurpunt and local farmers was greatly appreciated. Special thanks to Kris Van der Steen, Jan Van den Berghe and Dieter Dijckmans. Further, we thank our lab technicians Luc Willems and Greet de Bruyn for processing and analysing our samples. Kris Ceunen, Filip Ceunen, Luc Willems, Robbe De Beelde, Jelle Van den Berghe, Danny Vereecke and Tomohiro Nagata are thanked for helping with fieldwork. Lander Baeten and Haben Blondeel are thanked for helping out with the statistics. We thank Rob Marrs, Tobias Ceulemans, Frank Nevens, Lander Baeten and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
- Aerts R, Chapin FS (1999) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res pp 1–67Google Scholar
- Bakker JP, Elzinga JA, de Vries Y (2002) Effects of long-term cutting in a grassland system: perspectives for restoration of plant communities on nutrient-poor soils. Appl Veg Sci 5:107–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2002.tb00540.x Google Scholar
- Bartoń K (2018) MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.42.1 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
- Bauke SL, von Sperber C, Tamburini F, Gocke MI, Honermeier B, Schweitzer K, Baumecker M, Don A, Sandhage-Hofmann A, Amelung W (2018) Subsoil phosphorus is affected by fertilization regime in long-term agricultural experimental trials. Eur J Soil Sci 69:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bolker B, R Core Team (2016) bbmle: Tools for General Maximum Likelihood Estimation. R package version 1.0.20 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bbmle
- Ceulemans T, Stevens CJ, Duchateau L, Jacquemyn H, Gowing DJG, Merckx R, Wallace H, van Rooijen N, Goethem T, Bobbink R, Dorland E, Gaudnik C, Alard D, Corcket E, Muller S, Dise NB, Dupré C, Diekmann M, Honnay O (2014) Soil phosphorus constrains biodiversity across European grasslands. Glob Chang Biol 20:3814–3822. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Duffková R, Hejcman M, Libichová H (2015) Effect of cattle slurry on soil and herbage chemical properties, yield, nutrient balance and plant species composition of moderately dry Arrhenatherion grassland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 213:281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Duru M, Thélier-Huché L (1995) N and P–K status of herbages: use for diagnosis of grasslands. Diagnostic Proced Crop N Manag 125–138Google Scholar
- Egnér H, Riehm H, Domingo W (1960) Untersuchung über die chemische Bodenanalyse als Grundlage für die Beurteilung des Nährstoffzustandes der Böden. II. Chemische Extraktionsmethoden zur Phosphor und Kaliumbestimmung. K Lantbrukshogskolans Ann 26:199–215Google Scholar
- European Commission (2015) Report from the commission to the council and European parliament. The State of Nature in the European Union. Report on the status of and trends for habitat types and species covered by the Birds and Habitats Directives for the 2007–2012 period as required. Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- Johnston AE, Poulton PR, Fixen PE, Curtin D (2014) Phosphorus. Its efficient use in agriculture., 1st ed. Adv Agron. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420225-2.00005-4
- Kruse J, Abraham M, Amelung W, Baum C, Bol R, Kühn O, Lewandowski H, Niederberger J, Oelmann Y, Rüger C, Santner J, Siebers M, Siebers N, Spohn M, Vestergren J, Vogts A, Leinweber P (2015) Innovative methods in soil phosphorus research : a review. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 178:43–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201400327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lajtha K, Driscoll CT, Jarrell WM, Elliott ET (1999) Soil phosphorus: characterization and Total element analysis. In: Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins P (eds) Stand. Soil Methods Long-Term Ecol. Res. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 115–142Google Scholar
- Olsen SR, Cole C V, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circ 939Google Scholar
- Pinheiro J, Bates D, Debroy S, et al. (2017) Nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–131 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
- R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.3.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Ringeval B, Augusto L, Monod H, van Apeldoorn D, Bouwman L, Yang X, Achat DL, Chini LP, van Oost K, Guenet B, Wang R, Decharme B, Nesme T, Pellerin S (2017) Phosphorus in agricultural soils: drivers of its distribution at the global scale. Glob Chang Biol 23:3418–3432. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13618 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schelfhout S, Mertens J, Perring MP, Raman M, Baeten L, Demey A, Reubens B, Oosterlynck S, Gibson-Roy P, Verheyen K, de Schrijver A (2017) P-removal for restoration of Nardus grasslands on former agricultural land: cutting traditions. Restor Ecol 25:S178–S187. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schellberg J, Hejcman M (2007) The Rengen grassland experiment (1941 - 2006) and its contribution to grassland ecology. Grassl Sci Eur 12:512–515Google Scholar
- Schwertmann U (1964) Differenzierung der Eisenoxide des Bodens durch Extraktion mit Ammoniumoxalat-Lösung. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 105:194–202Google Scholar
- Suding KN (2011) Toward an era of restoration in ecology: successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:465–487. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weisser WW, Roscher C, Meyer S, et al. (2017) Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning in a 14-year grassland experiment : patterns , mechanisms , and open questions. Basic Appl Ecol 23:1–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2017.06.002
- Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New YorkGoogle Scholar