Fine root biomass, production and turnover rates in plantations versus natural forests: effects of stand characteristics and soil properties
- 166 Downloads
Fine roots play a significant role in regulating the biogeochemical cycles of forest ecosystems, but how fine root biomass (FRB), production (FRP) and turnover rates (FRT) vary with forest origins remains not well understood.
The meta-analysis approach was used to examine the differences in FRB, FRP and FRT between plantations and their adjacent natural forests based on 238 cases reported in 45 published studies.
FRB and FRP were 36.5% and 36.0% lower, respectively, in plantations than in natural forests. FRT was 22.4% higher in plantations relative to natural forests. The decrease in FRB in plantations relative to natural forests varied among plantations with different plant genera and root diameter classes. The general patterns for FRP and FRT in relation to various factors (biogeographic zone, leaf form, leaf seasonality, plant genus in plantations, and root diameter class) did not differ among the groups. The difference in FRB between plantations and natural forests was positively correlated with stand age but negatively related with soil total nitrogen concentration, the difference in FRP was positively affected by diameter at breast height (DBH) and soil pH, and the difference in FRT was positively affected by DBH, tree height, soil bulk density and soil pH and negatively affected by soil organic carbon and total nitrogen concentration.
FRB, FRP and FRT exhibit significant differences between plantations and natural forests and that these differences are partially caused by shifts in stand characteristics and variations in soil properties.
KeywordsFine roots Forest origins Planted forests Stand structure Soil nutrient
We thank all the researchers whose data were used in this study and anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31730015), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (No. 2017M621232) and the Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Foundation (No. LBH-Z17004).
- Chia RW, Kim DG, Yimer F (2017) Can afforestation with Cupressus lusitanica restore soil C and N stocks depleted by crop cultivation to levels observed under native systems? Agric Ecosyst Environ 242:67–75Google Scholar
- Eissenstat DM, Yanai RD (2002) Root life span, efficiency, and turnover. Plant roots: the hidden half. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 221–238Google Scholar
- Jackson RB, Schenk HJ, Jobbágy EG, Canadell J, Colello GD, Dickinson RE, Field CB, Friedlingstein P, Heimann M, Hibbard K, Kicklighter DW, Kleidon A, Neilson RP, Parton WJ, Sala OE, Sykes MT (2000) Belowground consequences of vegetation change and their treatment in models. Ecol Appl 10:470–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leuschner C, Hertel D (2003) Fine root biomass of temperate forests in relation to soil acidity and fertility, climate, age and species. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 405–438Google Scholar
- McCormack ML, Dickie IA, Eissenstat DM, Fahey TJ, Fernandez CW, Guo DL, Helmisaari HS, Hobbie EA, Iversen CM, Jackson RB, Leppalammi-Kujansuu J, Norby RJ, Phillips RP, Pregitzer KS, Pritchard SG, Rewald B, Zadworny M (2015) Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. New Phytol 207:505–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Silva AKL, Vasconcelos SS, de Carvalho CJR, Cordeiro IMCC (2011) Litter dynamics and fine root production in Schizolobium parahyba var. amazonicum plantations and regrowth forest in eastern Amazon. Plant Soil 347:377–386Google Scholar
- Smith CK, Oliveira FDA, Gholz HL, Baima A (2002) Soil carbon stocks after forest conversion to tree plantations in lowland Amazonia, Brazil. For Ecol Manag 164:257–263Google Scholar
- Stephenson NL, Das AJ, Condit R, Russo SE, Baker PJ, Beckman NG, Coomes DA, Lines ER, Morris WK, Rüger N, Álvarez E, Blundo C, Bunyavejchewin S, Chuyong G, Davies SJ, Duque Á, Ewango CN, Flores O, Franklin JF, Grau HR, Hao Z, Harmon ME, Hubbell SP, Kenfack D, Lin Y, Makana JR, Malizia A, Malizia LR, Pabst RJ, Pongpattananurak N, Su SH, Sun IF, Tan S, Thomas D, van Mantgem PJ, Wang X, Wiser SK, Zavala MA (2014) Rate of tree carbon accumulation increases continuously with tree size. Nature 507:90–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U (2002) Plant roots: the hidden half. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar