Plant and Soil

, Volume 434, Issue 1–2, pp 327–342 | Cite as

Coping with drought: root trait variability within the perennial grass Dactylis glomerata captures a trade-off between dehydration avoidance and dehydration tolerance

  • Pauline Bristiel
  • Catherine Roumet
  • Cyrille Violle
  • Florence VolaireEmail author
Regular Article


Background and aims

Understanding plant adaptation to drought is a crucial challenge under climate change. This study aimed to investigate root traits and water use of grass populations exhibiting a range of dehydration avoidance and tolerance strategies to cope with drought.


Sixteen populations of the perennial grass Dactylis glomerata originating from three biogeographical origins (Northern, Temperate and Mediterranean) were grown in long tubes. Plant biomass, rooting depth and morphological traits of deep roots were measured both under full irrigation and under severe drought. Water uptake under drought was used as a proxy for dehydration avoidance. Plant survival after severe drought was used as a measure of dehydration tolerance.


All populations had similar maximum rooting depth and specific root length. Compared to Northern and Temperate populations, Mediterranean populations had half the total and deep root biomass, but thinner and denser deep roots. They were less affected by drought. These traits were associated with less water uptake (lower dehydration avoidance) but greater survival to severe drought (enhanced dehydration tolerance).


The intraspecific variability in root traits revealed a trade-off between dehydration avoidance and dehydration tolerance which illustrates contrasting adaptive plant and root strategies associated with the biogeographical origins of populations.


Cocksfoot Orchardgrass, drought Functional trade-off Intraspecific variability Root traits Plant strategies Water acquisition 



Thanks to Pascal Chapon for excellent technical assistance, and to the ‘Terrain d’experience’ platform and the Plateforme d’Analyses Chimiques en Ecologie both at CEFE-CNRS (Labex CEMEB). Thanks to Mark Norton and anonymous reviewers for their relevant comments and text editing. Thanks to Hervé Gaillard (Unité Sciences du Sol, INRA Orleans) for soil analysis. Pauline Bristiel was financially supported by INRA (EA department). This study was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant Project ‘Ecophysiological and biophysical constraints on domestication in crop plants’ [Grant ERC-StG-2014-639706-CONSTRAINTS].

Supplementary material

11104_2018_3854_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Table S1 List of the 16 populations of Dactylis glomerata. Climatic data associated with their origins were collected from the WorldClim data set (; Hijmans et al., 2005). Seeds from Northern populations were provided by the Nordic Genetic Resource Center (NordGen). Temperate ecotypes and cultivars, and population ‘Porto’, were provided by the plant genetic resources information system of the National Institute for Agronomical Research (INRA, France, Lusignan). The Sicilian ecotype came from University of Catania, Italy. The Moroccan ecotypes came from INRA Rabat, Morocco. (DOCX 14 kb)
11104_2018_3854_MOESM2_ESM.docx (40 kb)
Table S2 Mean and range of the traits measured under irrigation or under drought on 16 populations of D. glomerata. (DOCX 40 kb)
11104_2018_3854_MOESM3_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Table S3 Root biomass distribution in soil columns (0-200 cm): Mean and standard deviation of root biomass for each 25cm layer for Northern, Temperate and Mediterranean populations of D. glomerata under drought or irrigation. (DOCX 14 kb)
11104_2018_3854_MOESM4_ESM.docx (43 kb)
Table S4 Correlations between the total water use measured under drought and eleven traits measured under irrigation or under drought. The R coefficient of Pearson correlations were represented with associated P-value (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns: not significant). (DOCX 42 kb)
11104_2018_3854_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (23 kb)
Figure S5 Mean values and standard errors of dehydration tolerance (plant survival rate in short pots after severe drought) measured on 16 populations of D. glomerata from different origins: Northern in blue, Temperate in green and Mediterranean in red. Letters indicate significant differences between origins (Kruskal-Wallis test; P < 0.05). (PDF 22 kb)


  1. Alameda D, Villar R (2012) Linking root traits to plant physiology and growth in Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. Seedlings under soil compaction conditions. Environ Exp Bot 79:49–57Google Scholar
  2. Balachowski JA, Bristiel PM, Volaire FA (2016) Summer dormancy, drought survival and functional resource acquisition strategies in California perennial grasses. Ann Bot 118:357–368. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barkaoui K, Roumet C, Volaire F (2016) Mean root trait more than root trait diversity determines drought resilience in native and cultivated Mediterranean grass mixtures. Agric Ecosyst Environ 231:122–132. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benavides R, Escudero A, Coll L, Ferrandis P, Gouriveau F, Hódar JA, Ogaya R, Rabasa SG, Granda E, Santamaría BP, Martínez-Vilalta J, Zamora R, Espelta JM, Peñuelas J, Valladares F (2015) Survival vs. growth trade-off in early recruitment challenges global warming impacts on mountain trees. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 17:369–378.
  5. Borrill M (1991) Evolution and genetic resources in cocksfoot. In: Tushiya & Gupta (ed) Chromosome Engineering in Plants: Genetics, Breeding, Evolution, Part B. Elsevier Science Publishers, pp 379–398Google Scholar
  6. Bristiel P, Gillespie L, Østrem L, Balachowski J, Violle C, Volaire F (2018) Experimental evaluation of the robustness of the growth-stress tolerance trade-off within the perennial grass Dactylis glomerata. Funct Ecol 32:1944–1958. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown H, Moot D, Pollock K (2005) Herbage production, persistence, nutritive characteristics and water use of perennial forages grown over 6 years on a Wakanui silt loam. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 48:423–439.
  8. Comas LH, Mueller KE, Taylor LL, Midford PE, Callahan HS, Beerling DJ (2012) Evolutionary patterns and biogeochemical significance of angiosperm root traits. Int J Plant Sci 173:584–595. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Comas LH, Becker SR, Cruz VMV, Byrne PF, Dierig DA (2013) Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought. Front Plant Sci 4:442. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper JP (1964) Climatic variation in forage grasses I. J Appl Ecol 1:45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craine JM, Froehle J, Tilman DG, Wedin DA, Chapin FS III (2001) The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients. Oikos 93:274–285. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daget P (1977) Le bioclimat méditerranéen: caractères généraux, modes de caractérisation. Vegetatio 34:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dai A (2011) Drought under global warming: a review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 2:45–65. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Frenne P, Graae BJ, Rodriguez-Sanchez F et al (2013) Latitudinal gradients as natural laboratories to infer species’ responses to temperature. J Ecol 101:784–795. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eagles CF (1967) The effect of temperature on vegetative growth in climatic races of Dactylis glomerata in controlled environments. Ann Bot 31:31–39Google Scholar
  16. Eagles CF (1971) Effect of photoperiod on vegetative growth in two natural populations of Dactylis glomerata L. Ann Bot 35:75–86Google Scholar
  17. Fitter AH (1987) An architectural approach to the Comparitice ecology of plant root systems. New Phytol 106:61–77. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fitter A (2002) Characteristics and functions of root systems. In: Waisel Y, Eschel A, Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots, the hidden half. Third Edit. CRC Press, New York, pp 15–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fort F, Cruz P, Lecloux E, Bittencourt de Oliveira L, Stroia C, Theau JP, Jouany C (2016) Grassland root functional parameters vary according to a community-level resource acquisition-conservation trade-off. J Veg Sci 27:749–758. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fort F, Volaire F, Guilioni L, Barkaoui K, Navas ML, Roumet C (2017) Root traits are related to plant water-use among rangeland Mediterranean species. Funct Ecol 31:1700–1709. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freschet GT, Valverde-Barrantes OJ, Tucker CM, Craine JM, McCormack ML, Violle C, Fort F, Blackwood CB, Urban-Mead KR, Iversen CM, Bonis A, Comas LH, Cornelissen JHC, Dong M, Guo D, Hobbie SE, Holdaway RJ, Kembel SW, Makita N, Onipchenko VG, Picon-Cochard C, Reich PB, de la Riva EG, Smith SW, Soudzilovskaia NA, Tjoelker MG, Wardle DA, Roumet C (2017) Climate, soil and plant functional types as drivers of global fine-root trait variation. J Ecol 105:1–15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garwood EA, Sinclair J (1979) Use of water by six grass species. 2. Root distribution and use of soil water. J Agric Sci 93:25. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gillepsie L, Volaire F (2017) Are winter and summer dormancy symmetrical seasonal adaptive strategies? The case of temperate herbaceous perennials. Ann Bot 119:311–323. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hernández EI, Vilagrosa A, Pausas JG, Bellot J (2010) Morphological traits and water use strategies in seedlings of Mediterranean coexisting species. Plant Ecol 207:233–244. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ho MD, Rosas JC, Brown KM, Lynch JP (2005) Root architectural tradeoffs for water and phosphorus acquisition. Funct Plant Biol 32:737. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hodgkinson L, Dodd IC, Binley A, Ashton RW, White RP, Watts CW, Whalley WR (2017) Root growth in field-grown winter wheat: some effects of soil conditions, season and genotype. Eur J Agron 91:74–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hummel I, Vile D, Violle C, Devaux J, Ricci B, Blanchard A, Garnier E, Roumet C (2007) Relating root structure and anatomy to whole plant functioning in 14 herbaceous Mediterranean species. New Phytol 173:313–321Google Scholar
  28. Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996) International Association for Ecology a Global Analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes a global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Source: Oecologia 108:389–411. Google Scholar
  29. Kooyers NJ (2015) The evolution of drought escape and avoidance in natural herbaceous populations. Plant Sci 234:155–162. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kramer-Walter KR, Bellingham PJ, Millar TR, Smissen RD, Richardson SJ, Laughlin DC (2016) Root traits are multidimensional: specific root length is independent from root tissue density and the plant economic spectrum. J Ecol 104:1299–1310. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laude HM (1953) The nature of summer dormancy in perennial grasses. Bot Gaz 114:284–292. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lelièvre F, Seddaiu G, Ledda L, Porqueddu C, Volaire F (2011) Water use efficiency and drought survival in Mediterranean perennial forage grasses. Field Crop Res. 121:333–342.
  33. Lenth R V. (2016) Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. J Stat Softw.
  34. Levitt JV. 1972. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stress. New-York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Levitt J, Wiebe HH, Boyer JS, McWilliam JR, Ritchie JT, Blum A, Bidinger F. 1980. Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress: summary and synthesis. In: Turner NCe, Kramer PJe, eds. Google Scholar
  36. Lobet G, Couvreur V, Meunier F, Javaux M, Draye X (2014) Plant water uptake in drying soils. Plant Physiol 164:1619–1627. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ludlow MM (1989) Strategies of response to water stress. Struct Funct Responses to Environ Stress 269–281Google Scholar
  38. Lumaret R (1988) Cytology, genetics, and evolution in the genus Dactylis. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 7:55–91Google Scholar
  39. Maeght J-L, Rewald B, Pierret A (2013) How to study deep roots-and why it matters. Front Plant Sci 4:299. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mapfumo E, Aspinwall D, Hancock T, Sedgley M (1993) Xylem development in relation to water uptake by roots of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). New Phytol 125:93–99.
  41. Markesteijn L, Poorter L (2009) Seedling root morphology and biomass allocation of 62 tropical tree species in relation to drought- and shade-tolerance. J Ecol 97:311–325. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCormack LM, Adams TS, Smithwick EAH, Eissenstat DM (2012) Predicting fine root lifespan from plant functional traits in temperate trees. New Phytol 195:823–831. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mcelrone AJ, Pockman WT, Martínez-vilalta J et al (2004) Variation in xylem structure and function in stems and roots. New Phytol 163:507–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McWilliam J, Kramer P (1968) The nature of the perennial response in Mediterranean grasses. I. Water relations and summer survival in Phalaris. Aust J Agric Res 19:381. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nardini A, Casolo V, Dal Borgo A, Savi T, Stenni B, Bertoncin P, Zini L, McDowell NG (2016) Rooting depth, water relations and non-structural carbohydrate dynamics in three woody angiosperms differentially affected by an extreme summer drought. Plant Cell Environ 39:618–627. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nicotra A, Babicka N, Westoby M (2002) Seedling root anatomy and morphology: an examination of ecological differentiation with rainfall using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Oecologia 130:136–145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Norton MR, Volaire F, Lelièvre F, Fukai S (2009) Identification and measurement of summer dormancy in temperate perennial grasses. Crop Sci 49:2347–2352. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Norton MRA, Lelièvre FB, Volaire FB (2014) Measuring dehydration tolerance in pasture grasses to improve drought survival. Crop Pasture Sci 65:828–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Olmo M, Lopez-Iglesias B, Villar R (2014) Drought changes the structure and elemental composition of very fine roots in seedlings of ten woody tree species. Implications for a drier climate. Plant Soil 384:113–129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ostonen I, Lohmus K, Helmisaari H-S, Truu J, Meel S (2007) Fine root morphological adaptations in scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch along a latitudinal gradient in boreal forests. Tree Physiol 27:1627–1634. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ostonen I, Truu M, Helmisaari H-S, Lukac M, Borken W, Vanguelova E, Godbold DL, Lõhmus K, Zang U, Tedersoo L, Preem JK, Rosenvald K, Aosaar J, Armolaitis K, Frey J, Kabral N, Kukumägi M, Leppälammi-Kujansuu J, Lindroos AJ, Merilä P, Napa Ü, Nöjd P, Parts K, Uri V, Varik M, Truu J (2017) Adaptive root foraging strategies along a boreal-temperate forest gradient. New Phytol 215:977–991. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Padilla FM, Pugnaire FI (2007) Rooting depth and soil moisture control Mediterranean woody seedling survival during drought. Funct Ecol 21:489–495. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pearson TRH, Burslem DFRP, Goeriz RE, Dalling JW (2003) Regeneration niche partitioning in neotropical pioneers: effects of gap size, seasonal drought and herbivory on growth and survival. Oecologia 137:456–465. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pérez-Ramos IM, Volaire F, Fattet M, Blanchard A, Roumet C (2013) Tradeoffs between functional strategies for resource-use and drought-survival in Mediterranean rangeland species. Environ Exp Bot 87:126–136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Poirier M, Durand J-LL, Volaire F (2012) Persistence and production of perennial grasses under water deficits and extreme temperatures: importance of intraspecific vs. interspecific variability. Glob Chang Biol 18:3632–3646. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Poorter H, Fiorani F, Stitt M, Schurr U, Finck A, Gibon Y, Usadel B, Munns R, Atkin OK, Tardieu F, Pons TL (2012) The art of growing plants for experimental purposes: a practical guide for the plant biologist review. Funct Plant Biol 39:821–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. RStudio Team (2015). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA
  58. Prieto I, Roumet C, Cardinael R, Dupraz C, Jourdan C, Kim JH, Maeght JL, Mao Z, Pierret A, Portillo N, Roupsard O, Thammahacksa C, Stokes A (2015) Root functional parameters along a land-use gradient: evidence of a community-level economics spectrum. J Ecol 103:361–373. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reich PB (2014) The world-wide “fast-slow” plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. J Ecol 102:275–301. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roumet C, Birouste M, Picon-Cochard C, Ghestem M, Osman N, Vrignon-Brenas S, Cao KF, Stokes A (2016) Root structure-function relationships in 74 species: evidence of a root economics spectrum related to carbon economy. New Phytol 210:815–826. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ryser P (1996) The importance of tissue density for growth and life span of leaves and roots: a comparison of five ecologically contrasting grasses. Funct Ecol 10:717. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schenk HJ, Jackson RB (2002) The global biogeography of roots. Ecol Monogr 72:311–328.[0311:TGBOR]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
  63. Sherwood S, Fu Q (2014) A drier future ? Science (80- ) 343:737–739Google Scholar
  64. Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  65. Skinner RH, Comas LH (2010) Root distribution of temperate forage species subjected to water and nitrogen stress. Crop Sci 50:2178–2185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Turner NC (1997) Further Progress in crop water relations. Adv Agron 58:293–338. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Violle C, Reich PB, Pacala SW, Enquist BJ, Kattge J (2014) The emergence and promise of functional biogeography. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:13690–13696. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Volaire F (2008) Plant traits and functional types to characterise drought survival of pluri-specific perennial herbaceous swards in Mediterranean areas. Eur J Agron 29:116–124. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Volaire F (2018) A unified framework for plant adaptive strategies to drought: across scales and disciplines. Glob Chang Biol 00:1–10. Google Scholar
  70. Volaire, F. & Lelièvre, F. (2001) Drought survival in Dactylis glomerata and Festuca arundinacea under similar rooting conditions in tubes. Plant Soil 229: 225.
  71. Volaire F, Norton M (2006) Summer dormancy in perennial temperate grasses. Ann Bot 98(5):927–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Volaire F, Thomas H, Lelièvre F (1998) Survival and recovery of perennial forage grasses under prolonged Mediterranean drought: I. growth, death, water relations and solute content in herbage and stubble. New Phytol 140:439–449. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Volaire F, Norton MR, Lelièvre F (2009) Summer drought survival strategies and sustainability of perennial temperate forage grasses in Mediterranean areas. Crop Sci 49:2386. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Volaire F, Barkaoui K, Norton M (2014) Designing resilient and sustainable grasslands for a drier future: adaptive strategies, functional traits and biotic interactions. Eur J Agron 52:81–89. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wahl S, Ryser P (2000) Root tissue structure is linked to ecological strategies of grasses. New Phytol 148:459–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang Y, Dong X, Wang H, Wang Z, Gu J (2016) Root tip morphology, anatomy, chemistry and potential hydraulic conductivity vary with soil depth in three temperate hardwood species. Tree Physiol 36:99–108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weemstra M, Mommer L, Visser EJW, van Ruijven J, Kuyper TW, Mohren GMJ, Sterck FJ (2016) Towards a multidimensional root trait framework: a tree root review. New Phytol 211:1159–1169. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. West CP, Wullschleger SD (1990) Osmotic adjustement in tissues of tall fescue in response to water deficit. Environ Exp Bot 30:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. White TA, Snow VO (2012) A modelling analysis to identify plant traits for enhanced water-use efficiency of pasture. Crop Pasture Sci. 63:63–76.
  80. Yang F, Feng Z, Wang H, Dai X, Fu X (2017) Deep soil water extraction helps to drought avoidance but shallow soil water uptake during dry season controls the inter-annual variation in tree growth in four subtropical plantations. Agric For Meteorol 234–235:106–114. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zwicke M, Picon-Cochard C, Morvan-Bertrand A, Prud’homme MP, Volaire F (2015) What functional strategies drive drought survival and recovery of perennial species from upland grassland? Ann Bot 116:1001–1015. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CEFE, INRA, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPHE, IRDMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.CEFE, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPHE, IRDMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations