Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 434, Issue 1–2, pp 47–64 | Cite as

Long-term fertilisation strategies and form affect nutrient budgets and soil test values, soil carbon retention and crop yield resilience

  • Frederik van der Bom
  • Jakob Magid
  • Lars Stoumann JensenEmail author
Regular Article
  • 145 Downloads

Abstract

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of long-term mineral and organic fertilisation on crop performance and soil fertility.

Methods

The Long-Term Nutrient Depletion Trial (Denmark) was used to analyse changes in concentrations of Olsen-P, exchangeable potassium (K) and soil carbon (C). Yield responses (2010–2016) were evaluated making use of an early-season temperature model, fertilisation practices were evaluated by nutrient budgets, and nitrogen use efficiency by calculation of apparent recovery (ANR) in subplots receiving mineral N.

Results

Olsen-P (r2 = 0.68, P < 0.001) and exchangeable K (r2 = 0.86, P < 0.001) were correlated with the nutrient budgets. Soil C concentrations increased from 10.0 g kg−1 (1995) to between 11.1–14.6 g kg−1 (2016), with the greatest accumulation under slurry applications (P < 0.05, equalling 17–47% retention of slurry-C inputs). Relative yield responses of spring barley were associated with early season cold stress, but the model was not applicable to other crops. Increases of ANR in response to long-term phosphorus (P) applications were not significant.

Conclusions

Balanced fertilisation is an effective way to maintain nutrient availability, and to ensure high and stable crop productivity and efficient use of nutrients. Direct C inputs from animal slurry are a major driver for increases of soil C concentrations.

Keywords

Phosphorus Potassium Nutrient deficiency Yield stability Nutrient use efficiency 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted over many years and would not have been possible without the technical staff at the experimental farm in Taastrup, in particular Carsten Jørgensen, Knud-Erik S. Knudsen and Keld Skov Nielsen, who have been of crucial value to the field experiment over the years. Thanks also to Simon Fiil Svane for his extensive work on the local weather station and data.

Supplementary material

11104_2018_3754_MOESM1_ESM.docx (35 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 35 kb)

References

  1. Bassirirad H (2000) Kinetics of nutrient uptake by roots: responses to global change. New Phytol 147:155–169.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00682.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blair N, Faulkner RD, Till AR, Poulton PR (2006) Long-term management impacts on soil C, N and physical fertility: Part I: Broadbalk experiment. Soil Tillage Res 91:30–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Böhm W (1979) Methods of studying root systems. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolinder MA, Janzen HH, Gregorich EG, Angers DA, VandenBygaart AJ (2007) An approach for estimating net primary productivity and annual carbon inputs to soil for common agricultural crops in Canada. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:29–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao N, Chen X, Cui Z, Zhang F (2012) Change in soil available phosphorus in relation to the phosphorus budget in China. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 94:161–170.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-012-9530-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christensen BT, Johnston AE (1997) Soil organic matter and soil quality: lessons learned from long-term experiments at Askov and Rothamsted. In: Gregorich EG, Carter MR (eds) Soil quality for crop production and ecosystem health. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 399–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colomb B, Debaeke P, Jouany C, Nolot JM (2007) Phosphorus management in low input stockless cropping systems: crop and soil responses to contrasting P regimes in a 36-year experiment in southern France. Eur J Agron 26:154–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delogu G, Cattivelli L, Pecchioni N, De Falcis D, Maggiore T, Stanca AM (1998) Uptake and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen in winter barley and winter wheat. Eur J Agron 9:11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(98)00019-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DMI (2012) Climate grid Denmark, daily and monthly values, 1989–2010, 10x10 km observed precipitation sum & 20x20 km average temperature, potential evaporation (Makkink), average wind speed, accumulated global radiation. Ministry of climate and energy, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  10. Dodd RJ, McDowell RW, Condron LM (2012) Predicting the changes in environmentally and agronomically significant phosphorus forms following the cessation of phosphorus fertilizer applications to grassland. Soil Use Manag 28:135–147.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2012.00390.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duan Y, Xu M, Gao S, Yang X, Huang S, Liu H, Wang B (2014) Nitrogen use efficiency in a wheat–corn cropping system from 15 years of manure and fertilizer applications. Field Crops Res 157:47–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edmeades DC (2003) The long-term effects of manures and fertilisers on soil productivity and quality: a review. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 66:165–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FAO (2015) World reference base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. Update 2015Google Scholar
  14. Gahoonia TS, Nielsen NE (1996) Variation in acquisition of soil phosphorus among wheat and barley genotypes. Plant Soil 178:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gahoonia TS, Nielsen NE (2004) Root traits as tools for creating phosphorus efficient crop varieties. Plant Soil 260:47–57.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000030168.53340.bc CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardner BR, Jones JP (1973) Effects of temperature on phosphate sorption isotherms and phosphate desorption. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 4:83–93.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627309366422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gavito ME, Curtis PS, Mikkelsen TN, Jakobsen I (2001) Interactive effects of soil temperature, atmospheric carbon dioxide and soil N on root development, biomass and nutrient uptake of winter wheat during vegetative growth. J Exp Bot 52:1913–1923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerzabek MH, Pichlmayer F, Kirchmann H, Haberhauer G (1997) The response of soil organic matter to manure amendments in a long-term experiment at Ultuna, Sweden. Eur J Soil Sci 48:273–282.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00547.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Godfray HCJ et al. (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people Science 327:812–818Google Scholar
  20. Grant CA, Flaten DN, Tomasiewicz DJ, Sheppard SC (2001) The importance of early season phosphorus nutrition. Can J Plant Sci 81:211–224.  https://doi.org/10.4141/P00-093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnston AE (1997) The value of long-term field experiments in agricultural, ecological, and environmental research. In: Donald LS (ed) Advances in agronomy, vol volume 59. Academic Press, pp 291–333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60057-7
  22. Johnston AE, Poulton PR, Fixen PE, Curtin D (2014) Phosphorus: its efficient use in agriculture. In: Donald LS (ed) Advances in agronomy, vol volume 123. Academic Press, pp 177–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420225-2.00005-4
  23. Johnston AE, Poulton PR, Coleman K, Macdonald AJ, White RP (2017) Changes in soil organic matter over 70 years in continuous arable and ley–arable rotations on a sandy loam soil in England. Eur J Soil Sci 68:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kätterer T, Bolinder MA, Andrén O, Kirchmann H, Menichetti L (2011) Roots contribute more to refractory soil organic matter than above-ground crop residues, as revealed by a long-term field experiment. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141:184–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.02.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kätterer T, Börjesson G, Kirchmann H (2014) Changes in organic carbon in topsoil and subsoil and microbial community composition caused by repeated additions of organic amendments and N fertilisation in a long-term field experiment in Sweden. Agric Ecosyst Environ 189:110–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Landbrugsministeriet Plantedirektoratet (1994) Fælles arbejdsmetoder for jordbundsanalyserGoogle Scholar
  27. Ludwig B, Geisseler D, Michel K, Joergensen RG, Schulz E, Merbach I, Raupp J, Rauber R, Hu K, Niu L, Liu X (2011) Effects of fertilization and soil management on crop yields and carbon stabilization in soils. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 31:361–372.  https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2010030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maillard É, Angers DA (2014) Animal manure application and soil organic carbon stocks: a meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 20:666–679.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCollum RE (1991) Buildup and decline in soil phosphorus: 30-year trends on a Typic Umprabuult. Agron J 83:77–85.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300010019x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. de Mendiburu F (2016) agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural ResearchGoogle Scholar
  31. Möller K, Oberson A, Bünemann EK, Cooper J, Friedel JK, Glæsner N, Hörtenhuber S, Løes A-K, Mäder P, Meyer G, Müller T, Symanczik S, Weissengruber L, Wollmann I, Magid J (2018) Improved phosphorus recycling in organic farming: navigating between constraints. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy, vol 147. Academic press, pp 159–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2017.10.004
  32. Oelofse M, Jensen LS, Magid J (2013) The implications of phasing out conventional nutrient supply in organic agriculture: Denmark as a case. Org Agric 3:41–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-013-0045-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oenema O, Kros H, de Vries W (2003) Approaches and uncertainties in nutrient budgets: implications for nutrient management and environmental policies. Eur J Agron 20:3–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(03)00067-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Olde Venterink H (2016) Productivity increase upon supply of multiple nutrients in fertilization experiments; co-limitation or chemical facilitation? Plant Soil 408:515–518.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3055-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate Circular / United States Department of Agriculture 939:1–19Google Scholar
  36. Paustian K et al. (1990) Carbon and nitrogen budgets of four agro-ecosystems with annual and perennial crops, with and without N fertilization J Appl Ecol 27:60–84  https://doi.org/10.2307/2403568
  37. Peltre C, Nyord T, Bruun S, Jensen LS, Magid J (2015) Repeated soil application of organic waste amendments reduces draught force and fuel consumption for soil tillage. Agric Ecosyst Environ 211:94–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pendall E et al. (2004) Below-ground process responses to elevated CO2 and temperature: a discussion of observations, measurement methods, and models New Phytol 162:311–322  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01053.x
  39. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2015) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models R package version 31–121Google Scholar
  40. Porter JR, Gawith M (1999) Temperatures and the growth and development of wheat: a review. Eur J Agron 10:23–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(98)00047-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Quiquampoix H, Burns RG (2007) Interactions between proteins and soil mineral surfaces: environmental and health consequences. Elements 3:401–406.  https://doi.org/10.2113/GSELEMENTS.3.6.401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  43. RStudio Team (2015) RStudio: integrated development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  44. Schulte RPO, Melland AR, Fenton O, Herlihy M, Richards K, Jordan P (2010) Modelling soil phosphorus decline: expectations of water framework directive policies. Environ Sci Pol 13:472–484.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sharpley A, Jarvie HP, Buda A, May L, Spears B, Kleinman P (2013) Phosphorus legacy: overcoming the effects of past management practices to mitigate future water quality impairment. J Environ Qual 42:1308–1326.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.03.0098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shepherd MA, Withers PJ (1999) Applications of poultry litter and triple superphosphate fertilizer to a sandy soil: effects on soil phosphorus status and profile distribution. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 54:233–242.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009744706679 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simonsson M, Andersson S, Andrist-Rangel Y, Hillier S, Mattsson L, Öborn I (2007) Potassium release and fixation as a function of fertilizer application rate and soil parent material. Geoderma 140:188–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Staunton S, Ludwig B, Torrent J (2015) Barrow, N. J. A mechanistic model for describing the sorption and desorption of phosphate by soil. Journal of soil science, 34, 733–750. Commentary on the impact of barrow (1983): by S. Staunton, B. Ludwig & J. Torrent. Eur J Soil Sci 66:4–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12198_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Steffen W et al. (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet Science 347:736–746  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
  50. Strand E (1987) Base temperature levels in heat sum calculations. Acta Agric Scand 37:279–286.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00015128709436558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Syers JK, Johnston AE, Curtin D (2008) Efficiency of soil and fertilizer phosphorus use: reconciling changing concepts of soil phosphorus behaviour with agronomic information vol 18. Food and agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  52. Talbot J, Tarjus G, Van Tassel PR, Viot P (2000) From car parking to protein adsorption: an overview of sequential adsorption processes. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Aspects 165:287–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(99)00409-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thorup-Kristensen K, Cortasa MS, Loges R (2009) Winter wheat roots grow twice as deep as spring wheat roots, is this important for N uptake and N leaching losses? Plant Soil 322:101–114.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9898-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van der Bom F, Magid J, Jensen LS (2017) Long-term P and K fertilisation strategies and balances affect soil availability indices, crop yield depression risk and N use. Eur J Agron 86:12–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van der Bom F, Nunes I, Raymond NS, Hansen V, Bonnichsen L, Magid J, Nybroe O, Jensen LS (2018) Long-term fertilisation form, level and duration affect the diversity, structure and functioning of soil microbial communities in the field. Soil Biol Biochem 122:91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van Veen JA, Kuikman PJ (1990) Soil structural aspects of decomposition of organic matter by micro-organisms. Biogeochemistry 11:213–233.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00004497 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang Y, Wang E, Wang D, Huang S, Ma Y, Smith CJ, Wang L (2009) Crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency as affected by long-term fertilisation in North China plain. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 86:105–119.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-009-9276-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zicker T, von Tucher S, Kavka M, Eichler-Löbermann B (2018) Soil test phosphorus as affected by phosphorus budgets in two long-term field experiments in Germany. Field Crops Res 218:158–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zörb C, Senbayram M, Peiter E (2014) Potassium in agriculture – status and perspectives. J Plant Physiol 171:656–669.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plant and Soil Science Section, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark

Personalised recommendations