Mineral element composition of cabbage as affected by soil type and phosphorus and zinc fertilisation

  • Paula Pongrac
  • James W. McNicol
  • Allan Lilly
  • Jacqueline A. Thompson
  • Gladys Wright
  • Stephen Hillier
  • Philip J. White
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

The effects of phosphorus and zinc applications on phosphorus and zinc concentrations in plants grown in different soil types have rarely been investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different soil types and phosphorus and zinc addition on growth and mineral element composition of red cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L. cv. Red Drumhead).

Methods

Plants were grown for six weeks in three different soils (a freely drained Cambisol, an imperfectly drained Cambisol, and a Stagnosol) in a glasshouse. Each soil was amended with one of 25 combinations of phosphorus and zinc fertiliser. Soil characteristics, growth, and mineral element concentrations in shoots were assessed.

Results

Soil type significantly affected shoot growth and concentrations of phosphorus, zinc, potassium, calcium, magnesium and manganese, but not iron concentration of red cabbage. Across soils, the observed responses were attributed to soil phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, and sulphur concentrations, organic matter content, and mineral composition, mainly kaolinite and plagioclase.

Conclusions

Soil type effects on mineral element composition of red cabbage could have important implications for increasing mineral element concentration in crops to alleviate mineral element deficiencies in human diets.

Keywords

Uptake Mineral element interaction Brassica oleracea var. capitata Fertiliser Glasshouse 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division of the Scottish Government and an EU Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship (REA grant agreement n°623305) to Paula Pongrac, who also acknowledges financial support from the Slovenian Research Agency (P1-0212 programme) and Public Scholarship, Development, Disability and Maintenance Fund of the Republic of Slovenia. Authors are grateful to Ralph Wilson, John Rattray and Konrad Neugebauer for their help with collecting the soil and to Lawrie Brown for her help with Olsen P measurements. We thank Timothy S. George for reading the original manuscript.

Supplementary material

11104_2018_3628_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.7 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1779 kb)

References

  1. Akhtar MS, Oki Y, Adachi T (2010) Growth behavior, nitrogen-form effects on phosphorus acquisition, and phosphorus–zinc interactions in brassica cultivars under phosphorus-stress environment. Commun Soil Sci Plant 41:2022–2045.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2010.498534 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alloway BJ (2009) Soil factors associated with zinc deficiency in crops and humans. Envrion Geochem Health 31:537–548.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-009-9255-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barben SA, Nichols BA, Hopkins BG, Jolley VD, Ellsworth JW, Webb BL (2007) Phosphorus and zinc interactions in potato. Western Nutrient Management Conference 7. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, pp 219–223.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2012.631672
  4. Barben SA, Hopkins BG, Jolley VD, Webb BL, Nichols BA (2010) Phosphorus and manganese interactions and their relationship with zinc in chelator-buffered solution grown russet Burbank potato. J Plant Nutr 33:752–769.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160903575964 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker AV, Meagy MJ, Eaton TE, Jahanzad E, Bryson GM (2017) Enrichment of mineral nutrient content of cabbage through selection of cultivars and soil fertility regimes. J Plant Nutr 40:1465–1474.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1269343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrow NJ (2017) The effects of pH on phosphate uptake from the soil. Plant Soil 410:401–410.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3008-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boawn LC, Viets FG, Crawford CL (1954) Effect of phosphate fertilizers on zinc nutrition of field beans. Soil Sci 78:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Briat J-F, Rouached H, Tissot N, Gaymard F, Dubos C (2015) Integration of P, S, Fe and Zn nutrition signals in Arabidopsis thaliana: potential involvement of POSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE 1 (PHR1). Front Plant Sci 6:290.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00290 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Broadley MR, White PJ, Hammond JP, Zelko I, Lux A (2007) Zinc in plants. New Phytol 173:677–702.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01996.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Broadley MR, Lochlainn SÓ, Hammond JP, Bowen HC, Cakmak I, Eker S, Erdem H, King JG, White PJ (2010) Shoot zinc (Zn) concentrations varies widely with Brassica oleracea L. and is affected by soil Zn and phosphorus (P) levels. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 85:375–380.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2010.11512683 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cakmak I, Marschner H (1986) Mechanism of phosphorus-induced zinc-deficiency in cotton. II. Evidence for impaired shoot control of phosphorus uptake and translocation under zinc deficiency. Physiol Plant 68:491–496.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1986.tb03387.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell CR (2011) Ornamental cabbage. In: Campbell CR (ed) Reference sufficiency ranges for plant analysis in the southern region of the United States, Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 394, Southern Association of Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh, pp 115–116Google Scholar
  13. Campbell CR (2013) Reference sufficiency ranges for plant analysis in the southern region of the United States. Available via http://www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/saaesd/scsb394.pdf Accessed 26 Sept 2017
  14. Eshel G, Levy GJ, Mingelgrin U, Singer MJ (2004) Critical evaluation of the use of laser diffraction for particle-size distribution analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:736–743.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.0736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gardner WH (1965) Water content. In: Black C (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical properties, including statistics of measurement and sampling, Monogr. 9.1. ASA, SSSA, Madison, USA, pp 82–127Google Scholar
  16. Geelhoed JS, Riemsdijk WH van, Findenegg GR (1997) Effects of sulphate and pH on the plant-availability of phosphate adsorbed on goethite. Plant Soil 197:241–249. doi: doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004228715984
  17. Gianquinto G, Abu-Rayyan A, Tola LD, Piccotino D, Pezzarossa B (2000) Interaction effects of phosphorus and zinc on photosynthesis, growth and yield of dwarf bean grown in two environments. Plant Soil 220:219–228.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004705008101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. González-Costa JJ, Reigosa MJ, Matías JM, Fernández-Covelo E (2017) Analysis of the importance of oxides and clays in Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn adsorption and retention with regression trees. PLoS ONE 12(1):e0168523.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168523.s001 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Haldar M, Mandal LN (1981) Effect of phosphorus and zinc on the growth and phosphorus, zinc, copper, iron and manganese nutrition of rice. Plant Soil 59:415–425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02184546 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamlin RL, Schatz C, Barker AV (2003) Zinc accumulation in Indian mustard as influenced by nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition. J Plant Nutr 26:177–190.  https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-120016503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hammond JP, Broadley MR, White PJ, King GJ, Bowen HC, Hayden R, Meacham MC, Mead A, Overs T, Spracklen WP, Greenwood DJ (2008) Shoot yield drives phosphorus use efficiency in Brassica oleracea and correlates with root architecture traits. J Exp Bot 60:1953–1968.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hillier S (1999) Use of an air brush to spray dry samples for X-ray powder diffraction. Clay Miner 34:127–135.  https://doi.org/10.1180/000985599545984 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hillier S (2003) Quantitative analysis of clay and other minerals in sandstones by X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD). Int Assoc Sedimentol Spec Publ 34:213–251.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304336.ch11 Google Scholar
  24. Irving GCJ, McLaughlin MJ (1990) A rapid and simple field test for phosphorus in Olsen and Bray No. 1 extracts of soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 21:2245–2255.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629009368377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IUSS Working Group WRB (2015) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nation. Available via http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3794e.pdf Accessed 7 Nov 2017
  26. Lambers H, Plaxton WC (2015) Phosphorus: back to the roots. Annu Plant Rev 48:3–22.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118958841.ch1 Google Scholar
  27. Li H-Y, Zhu Y-G, Smith SE, Smith FA (2004) Phosphorus-zinc interactions in two barley cultivars differing in phosphorus and zinc efficiencies. J Plant Nutr 26:1085–1099.  https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-120020077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Amer J 42:421–428.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loneragan JF (1950) The effect of applied phosphate on the uptake of zinc by flax. Aust J Sci Res B 4:108–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu Z, Grewal HS, Graham RD (1998) Dry matter production and uptake of zinc and phosphorus in two oilseed rape genotypes under differential rates of zinc and phosphorus supply. J Plant Nutr 21:25–38.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169809365380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGrath SP, Loveland PJ (1992) The soil geochemical atlas of England and Wales. Blackie, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Olsen SR (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. Olsen SR, Bowman RA, Watanabe FS (1977) Behaviour of phosphorus in the soil and interactions with other nutrients. Phosphorus. Agriculture 70:31–46Google Scholar
  34. Omidi H, Tahmasebi Z, Torabi H, Miransari M (2008) Soil enzymatic activities and available P and Zn as affected by tillage practices, canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars and planting dates. Eur J Soil Biol 44:443–450.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Omotoso O, McCarty DK, Hillier S, Kleeberg R (2006) Some successful approaches to quantitative mineral analysis as revealed by the 3rd Reynolds Cup contest. Clay Clay Miner 54(6):748–760.  https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2006.0540609 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Orabi AA, Ismail AS, Mashadi H (1982) Zinc-phosphorus relationship in the nutrition of tomato plants as affected both by the soil and by the rate of applied zinc. Plant Soil 69:67–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02185704 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ova EA, Kutman UB, Ozturk L, Cakmak I (2015) High phosphorus supply reduced zinc concentration of wheat in native soil but not in autoclaved soil or nutrient solution. Plant Soil 393:147–162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2483-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parker DR, Aguiler JJ, Thomason DN (1992) Zinc-phosphorus interactions in two cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) grown in chelator-buffered nutrient solutions. Plant Soil 143:163–177.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007870 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pedas P, Husted S, Skytte K, Schjoerrin JK (2011) Elevated phosphorus impedes manganese acquisition by barley plants. Front Plant Sci 2:37.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2011.00037 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Saetz LF, Jurinak JJ (1957) Zinc and soil fertility. In: The 1957 yearbook of agriculture: soils. The United States Department of Agriculture Washington, USAGoogle Scholar
  41. Safaya NM (1976) Phosphorus-zinc interaction in relation to absorption rates of phosphorus, zinc, copper, manganese and iron in corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:719–722.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1976.03615995004000050031x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanchez PA (1976) Properties and management of soils in the tropics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh JP, Karamanos RE, Stewart JWB (1988) The mechanism of phosphorus-induced zinc deficiency in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Can J Soil Sci 68:345–358.  https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss88-032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stuckenholtz DD, Olsen RJ, Gogan G, Olson RA (1966) On the mechanism of phosphorus-zinc interaction in corn nutrition. Soil Sci Soc Am J 30:759–763.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1966.03615995003000060029x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Subramanian KS, Bharathi C, Jegan A (2008) Response of maize to mycorrhizal colonization at varying levels of zinc and phosphorus. Biol Fertil Soils 45:133–144.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0317-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sumner ME (1994) Measurement of soil pH: problems and solutions. Commun Soil Sci Plan 25:859–879.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629409369085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vance CP, Uhde-Stone C, Allan DL (2003) Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a non-renewable source. New Phytol 157:423–447.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00695.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ward RC, Langin EJ, Olson RA, Stukenholtz DD (1963) Factors responsible for poor response of corn and grain sorghum to phosphorus fertilization: III. Effects of soil compaction, moisture level and other properties on P-Zn relations. Soil Sci Soc Proc 27:326–333.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1963.03615995002700030033x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Watanabe T, Broadley MR, Jansen S, White PJ, Takada J, Satake K, Takamatsu T, Tuah SJ, Osaki M (2007) Evolutionary control of leaf element composition in plants. New Phytol 174:516–523.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02078.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. White PJ, Broadley MR (2009) Biofortification of crops with seven mineral elements often lacking in human diets – iron, zinc, copper, calcium, magnesium, selenium and iodine. New Phytol 182:49–84.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02738.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. White PJ, Broadley MR (2011) Physiological limits to zinc biofortification of edible crops. Front Plant Sci 2:80.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2011.00080 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. White PJ, Brown PH (2010) Plant nutrition for sustainable development and global health. Ann Bot 105:1073–1080.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq085 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. White PJ, Broadley MR, Thompson JA, McNicol JW, Crawley MJ, Poulton PR, Johnston AE (2012a) Testing the distinctness of shoot ionomes of angiosperm families using the Rothamsted Park grass continuous hay experiment. New Phytol 196:101–109.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04228.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. White PJ, Crawford JW, Diaz Álvarez MC, García Moreno R (2012b) Soil management for sustainable agriculture. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2012:1–3.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/850739 850739Google Scholar
  55. White PJ, George TS, Gregory PJ, Bengough AG, Hallett PD, McKenzie BM (2013) Matching roots to their environment. Ann Bot 112:207–222.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct123 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. White PJ, Pongrac P, Sneddon CC, Thompson JA, Wright G (2018) Limits to the biofortification of leafy brassicas with zinc. Agriculture 8:32.  https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8030032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang Y-Q, Deng Y, Cen R-Y, Cui Z-L, Chen X-P, Yost R, Zhang F-S, Zou C-Q (2012) The reduction in zinc concentration of wheat grain upon increased phosphorus fertilization and its mitigation by foliar zinc application. Plant Soil 361:143–152.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1238-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang W, Chen X-X, Liu Y-M, Liu D-Y, Chen X-P, Zou X-Q (2017) Zinc uptake by roots and accumulation in maize plants as affected by phosphorus application and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization. Plant Soil 413:59–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3213-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhu Y-G, Smith FA, Smith SE (2002) Phosphorus efficiencies and their effects on Zn, Cu, Mn nutrition of different barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivars grown in sand culture. Aust J Agric Res 53:211–216.  https://doi.org/10.1071/AR01085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The James Hutton InstituteDundeeUK
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Biotechnical FacultyUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  3. 3.Biomathematics and Statistics ScotlandDundeeUK
  4. 4.The James Hutton InstituteAberdeenUK
  5. 5.Department of Soil and EnvironmentSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)UppsalaSweden
  6. 6.Distinguished Scientist Fellowship ProgramKing Saud UniversityRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations