Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 434, Issue 1–2, pp 203–216 | Cite as

Potassium application alleviates grain sterility and increases yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in frost-prone Mediterranean-type climate

  • Qifu MaEmail author
  • Richard Bell
  • Ben Biddulph
Regular Article

Abstract

Aims

Frost is a major risk factor for grain production in Australian farming systems and appears to be increasing in severity and occurrence due to changing climate. In this study we assessed the role of potassium (K) and micronutrients in alleviating floret sterility (FS) and yield loss in wheat crops subject to frost.

Methods

Field experiments with K application in 2015 and 2016 were conducted in frost-prone, low soil K fields in the grain belt of Western Australia. Following frost events the heads reaching anther dehiscence were tagged and FS was measured 5–6 weeks later. We also measured leaf K concentration, photosynthesis and antioxidant activity, and grain yield.

Results

In 2015 K supply decreased FS from 32% at nil K to 24% at 80 kg K ha−1. In 2016 the FS values varied from 30 to >95%. Although there was no effect of K on FS at extreme frosts (FS >95%), applying 20–80 kg K ha−1 reduced FS by 10–20% and increased yield by 0.2–0.4 t ha−1 at less severe frosts. The decrease in FS was associated with increasing leaf K concentrations in the range 1.5–2.6%, higher photosynthesis and less oxidative stress at anthesis, but K supply did not provide extra protection from frost damage at leaf K > 2.6%. Foliar micronutrients at booting and heading did not affect FS in either year due to adequate micronutrient levels in the topsoil.

Conclusions

Improved plant K status can increase grain set and yields in wheat under frost, likely by maintaining physiological functions such as cell osmoregulation, plant photosynthesis and anti-oxidant systems. Plant K requirement in frost prone parts of the landscape is greater than in the areas with low risk of frost damage.

Keywords

Wheat Grain yield Potassium nutrition Frost damage Floret sterility 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Frost Initiative of the Grains Research and Development Corporation (Project UMU00045). We thank two anonymous referees for their valuable comments on the manuscript, and Mr. Nathan Height, DPIRD for technical support in the field and the experimental management by Living Farm (Richard Devlin and Rebecca Smith).

References

  1. Allen DJ, Ort DR (2001) Impacts of chilling temperatures on photosynthesis in warm-climate plants. Trends Plant Sci 6:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beauchamp C, Fridovich I (1971) Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 44:276–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergmann W (1992) Nutritional disorders of plants. VCH Publishers Inc., FloridaGoogle Scholar
  4. Biddulph B, Laws M, Eckermann P, Leske B, March T, Eglinton J (2015) Preliminary ratings of wheat varieties for susceptibility to reproductive frost damage. 2015 Agribusiness Crop Updates, PerthGoogle Scholar
  5. Braidotti G (2017) Record frost losses prompt national research review. Ground Cover, Issue 126, January–February. Grains Research and Development Corporation, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  6. Brennan RF, Bell MJ (2013) Soil potassium - crop response calibration relationships and criteria for field crops grown in Australia. Crop Pasture Sci 64:514–522Google Scholar
  7. Cakmak I (2000) Possible roles of zinc in protecting plant cells from damage by reactive oxygen species. New Phytol 146:185–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cakmak I (2005) The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 168:521–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colwell JD, Esdaile RJ (1968) The calibration, interpretation and evaluation of tests for the phosphorus fertiliser requirement of wheat to northern New South Wales. Aust J Soil Res 6:105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crimp S, Christopher J (2014) Frost risk on the rise despite warmer climate. Ground Cover Supplement, Issue 109, March–April. Grains Research and Development Corporation, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  11. Foyer CH, Lelandais M, Kunert KJ (1994) Photooxidative stress in plants. Physiol Plant 92:696–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foyer CH, Vanacker H, Gomez LD, Harbinson J (2002) Regulation of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in maize leaves at optimal and chilling temperatures: review. Plant Physiol Biochem 40:659–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gómez-Ruiz PA, Lindig-Cisneros R, de la Barrera E, Martorell C (2016) Potassium enhances frost tolerance in young individuals of three tropical dry forest species from Mexico. Funct Plant Biol 43:461–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grewal JS, Singh SN (1980) Effect of potassium nutrition on frost damage and yield of potato plants on alluvial soils of the Punjab (India). Plant Soil 57:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grownotes GRDC (2016) Tips and tactics: managing frost risk, northern, southern and western regions, February issue. Grains Research and Development Corporation, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  16. Hakerlerler H, Oktay M, Eryüce N, Yagmur B (1997) Effect of potassium sources on the chilling tolerance of some vegetable seedlings grown in hotbeds. In: Johnston AE (ed) Food Security in the WANA Region, the Essential Need for Balanced Fertilization. International Potash Institute, Basel, pp 317–327Google Scholar
  17. Haque MZ (1988) Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on spikelet sterility induced by low temperature at the reproductive stage of rice. Plant Soil 109:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang L, Bell RW, Dell B, Woodward J (2004) Rapid nitric acid digestion of plant material with an open-vessel microwave system. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 35:427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang L, Ye Z, Bell RW, Dell B (2005) Boron nutrition and chilling tolerance of warm climate crop species. Ann Bot 96:755–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huner NPA, Öquist G, Sarhan F (1998) Energy balance and acclimation to light and cold. Trends Plant Sci 3:224–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kant S, Kafkafi U (2002) Potassium and abiotic stresses in plants. In: Pasricha NS, Bansal SK (eds) Potassium for Sustainable Crop Production. Potash Institute of India, Gurgaon, pp 233–251Google Scholar
  22. Lee DH, Lee CB (2000) Chilling stress-induced changes of antioxidant enzymes in the leaves of cucumber: in gel enzyme activity assays. Plant Sci 159:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marschner H (1995) Mineral Plant Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd edn. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. McKersie BD, Leshem YY (1994) Stress and Stress Coping in Cultivated Plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oosterhuis DM, Loka DA, Raper TB (2013) Potassium and stress alleviation: physiological functions and management of cotton. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 176:331–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parish RW, Phan HA, Iacuone S, Li SF (2012) Tapetal development and abiotic stress: a centre of vulnerability. Func. Plant Biol 39:553–559Google Scholar
  27. Pearce RS (2001) Plant freezing and damage. Ann Bot 87:417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rebbeck MA, Knell GR (2007) Managing Frost Risk – A Guide for Southern Australian Grains. Ground Cover Direct, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  29. Reuter DJ, Robinson JB (1997) Plant Analysis: An Interpretation Manual, 2nd edn. CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  30. Römheld V, Kirkby EA (2010) Research on potassium in agriculture: need and prospects. Plant Soil 355:155–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith R, Minkey D, Butcher T, Jackson S, Reeves K, Biddulph B (2017) Stubble management recommendations and limitations for frost prone landscapes. In: Proceedings of 2017 Agribusiness Crop Updates, PerthGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang M, Zheng Q, Shen Q, Guo S (2013) The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. Int J Mol Sci 14:7370–7390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weaver DM, Wong MTK (2011) Scope to improve phosphorus (P) management and balance efficiency of crop and pasture soils with contrasting P status and buffering indices. Plant Soil 349:37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Veterinary and Life SciencesMurdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Primary Industry and Regional DevelopmentSouth PerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations