Advertisement

Crop diversity facilitates soil aggregation in relation to soil microbial community composition driven by intercropping

  • Xiu-li Tian
  • Cheng-bao Wang
  • Xing-guo Bao
  • Ping Wang
  • Xiao-fei Li
  • Si-cun Yang
  • Guo-chun Ding
  • Peter Christie
  • Long LiEmail author
Regular Article
  • 153 Downloads

Abstract

Background and Aims

Studies verify that intercropping increases soil macro-aggregates but the mechanism underlying the increase is poorly understood.

Methods

Three long-term field experiments were conducted starting in 2009 at three sites in an oasis in northwest China. The first was a split-plot design: Rhizobium (with or without inoculation) and three cropping systems (faba bean/maize intercropping and corresponding monocultures). The second and third experiments were both single-factorial randomized block designs with nine cropping systems (maize intercropped with faba bean, chickpea, soybean, or oilseed rape, and the corresponding monocultures). Soil aggregates were determined by the wet sieving method. Microbial biomass and community composition in 2015 and 2016 were determined by phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) and high throughput sequencing analysis of 16S rRNA.

Results

Soil macro-aggregates (> 2 mm) in intercropping systems increased by 15.5–58.6% across three sites and two years, an effect derived partly from increased relative abundance of soil Sordariales, from enhanced arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi biomass, or from reduced relative abundance of Nitrospirae, depending on soil type.

Conclusions

Intercropping alters soil microbial community composition and further facilitates soil aggregation. These findings provide insights into the mechanisms underlying the maintenance of biodiversity in ecosystem functioning.

Keywords

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Crop diversity Intercropping Legumes Long-term field experiments Maize Nitrospirae Soil aggregates Sordariales 

Abbreviations

AMF

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

C

Carbon

FAMEs

Fatty acid methyl esters

FB

Fungal biomass

K

Potassium

N

Nitrogen

non-AMF

non-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

P

Phosphorus

PLFA

Phospholipid fatty acid

PLS-DA

Partial least squares discriminant analysis

SEM

Structural equation model

Notes

Acknowledgements

We appreciate Prof. Huiru Peng from China Agricultural University for her great help in statistical analysis of results. We also thank Fei Wang and Ning Shi for help with the high throughput sequencing work and Fangfang Zhang for suggestions leading to the improvement of an earlier version of the manuscript. This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Project no. 31430014).

Supplementary material

11104_2018_3924_MOESM1_ESM.doc (994 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 993 kb)

References

  1. Alvey S, Yang CH, Buerkert A, Crowley DE (2003) Cereal/legume rotation effects on rhizosphere bacterial community structure in west African soils. Biol Fertil Soils 37:73–82Google Scholar
  2. Amézketa E (1999) Soil aggregate stability: a review. J Sustain Agric 14:83–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bach EM, Hofmockel KS (2014) Soil aggregate isolation method affects measures of intra-aggregate extracellular enzyme activity. Soil Biol Biochem 69:54–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barthes B, Roose E (2002) Aggregate stability as an indicator of soil susceptibility to runoff and erosion validation at several levels. Catena 47:133–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) Extraction of lipids in solution by the method of Bligh and Dyer. J Physiol Biochem 37:911–917Google Scholar
  6. Bloom SA (1981) Similarity indices in community studies: potential pitfalls. Mar Ecol-Prog. Ser 5:125–128Google Scholar
  7. Bossuyt H, Denef K, Six J, Frey SD, Merckx R, Paustian K (2001) Influence of microbial populations and residue quality on aggregate stability. Appl Soil Ecol 16:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:325–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bronick CJ, Lal R (2005) Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma 124:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown GG, Barois I, Lavelle P (2000) Regulation of soil organic matter dynamics and microbial activity in the drilosphere and the role of interactions with other edaphic functional domains. Eur J Soil Biol 36:177–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buee M, Reich M, Murat C, Morin E, Nilsson RH, Uroz S, Martin F (2009) 454 pyrosequencing analyses of forest soils reveal an unexpectedly high fungal diversity. New Phytol 184:449–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bünemann EK, Bossio DA, Smithson PC, Frossard E, Oberson A (2004) Microbial community composition and substrate use in a highly weathered soil as affected by crop rotation and P fertilization. Soil Biol Biochem 36:889–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caesar-TonThat TC, Cochran VL (2000) Soil aggregate stabilization by a saprophytic lignin-decomposing basidiomycete fungus I. microbiological aspects. Biol Fertil Soils 32:374–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD (2010) QIIME allows integration and analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chu GX, Shen QR, Cao JL (2004) Nitrogen fixation and N transfer from peanut to rice cultivated in aerobic soil in an intercropping system and its effect on soil N fertility. Plant Soil 263:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Corbin AT, Thelen KD, Robertson GP, Richard HL (2010) Influence of cropping systems on soil aggregate and weed seedbank dynamics during the organic transition period. Agron J 102:1632–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dahmardeh M, Ghanbari A, Syahsar B, Ramrodi M (2010) The role of intercropping maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) on yield and soil chemical properties. Afric. J Agric Res 5:631–636Google Scholar
  18. Degens BP (1997) Macro-aggregation of soils by biological bonding and binding mechnisms and the factors affecting these: a review. Aust J Soil Res 35:431–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denef K, Six J, Bossuyt H, Frey SD, Elliot ET, Merckx R, Paustian K (2001) Influence of dry-wey cycles on the interrelationship between aggregate, particulate organic matter, and microbial community dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1599–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Denef K, Six J, Merckx R, Paustian K (2002) Short-term effects of biological and physical forces on aggregate formation in soils with different clay mineralogy. Plant Soil 246:185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diaz-Zorita M, Perfect E, Grove J (2002) Disruptive methods for assessing soil structure. Soil Tillage Res 64:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dissanayaka DMSB, Maruyama H, Masuda G, Wasaki J (2015) Interspecific facilitation of P acquisition in intercropping of maize with white lupin in two contrasting soils as influenced by different rates and forms of P supply. Plant Soil 390:223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duchicela J, Sulivan TS, Bontti E, Bever JD (2013) Soil aggregate stability increase is strongly related to fungal community succession along an abandoned agricultural field chronosequence in the Bolivian Altiplano. J Appl Ecol 50:1266–1273Google Scholar
  24. Eisenhauer N, Bessler H, Engels C, Gleixner G, Habekost M, Milcu A, Partsch S, Sabais ACW, Scherber C, Steinbeiss S, Weigelt A, Weisser WW, Scheu S (2010) Plant diversity effects on soil microorganisms support the singular hypothesis. Ecology 91:485–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fan WG, Tang YR, Qu Y, Cao FB, Huo GC (2014) Infant formula supplemented with low protein and high carbohydrate alters the intestinal microbiota in neonatal SD rats. BMC Microbiol 14:279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Francis CA (1986) Multiple cropping systems. 383 pp. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Frostegård Å, Bååth E (1996) The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil. Biol Fertil Soils 22:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frostegård Å, Tunlid A, Bååth E (1991) Microbial biomass measured as total lipid phosphate in soils of different organic content. J Microbiol Methods 14:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garland G, Bünemann EK, Oberson A, Frossard E, Six J (2017, 2016) Plant mediated rhizospheric interactions in maize-pigeon pea intercropping enhance soil aggregation and organic phosphorus storage. Plant Soil:1–19Google Scholar
  30. Ghosh PK, Mohanty M, Bandyopadhyay KK, Painuli DK, Misra AK (2006) Growth, competition, yields advantage and economics in soybean/pigeonpea intercropping system in semiarid tropics of India. Field Crop Res 96:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guillou CL, Angers DA, Leterme P, Menasseri-Aubry S (2011) Differential and successive effects of residue quality and soil mineral N on water-stable aggregation during crop residue decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1955–1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gupta VVSR, Germida JJ (1988) Distribution of microbial biomass and its activity in different soil aggregate size classes as affected by cultivation. Soil Biol Biochem 20:777–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gupta VVSR, Germida JJ (2015) Soil aggregation: influence on microbial biomass and implications for biological processes. Soil Biol Biochem 80:A3–A9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Gooding M, Ambus P, Corre-Hellou G, Crozat Y, Dahlmann C, Dibet A, von Fragstein P, Pristeri A, Monti M, Jensen ES (2009) Pea-barley intercropping for efficient symbiotic N2-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic cropping systems. Field Crop Res 113:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Haynes W (2013) Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. In: Wilcoxon rank sum test. Encyclopedia of systems biology. Springer, New York, pp 2354–2355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jagadamma S, Steinweg JM, Mayes MA, Wang GS, Post WM (2014) Decomposition of added and native organic carbon from physically separated fractions of diverse soils. Biol Fertil Soils 50:613–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jakobsen I, Rosendahl L (1990) Carbon flow into soil and external hyphae from roots of mycorrhizal cucumber plants. New Phytol 115:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kihara J, Martius C, Bationo A, Thuita M, Lesueur D, Herrmann L, Amelung W, Vlek PLG (2012) Soil aggregation and total diversity of bacteria and fungi in various tillage systems of sub-humid and semi-arid Kenya. Appl Soil Ecol 58:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kline RB (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Third ed.). Guilford, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  40. Kremer RJ, Kussman R (2009) Soil quality in a pecan agroforestry system is improved with intercropped kura clover. Agrofor Syst 7:377–383Google Scholar
  41. Lehmann A, Rillig MC (2015) Understanding mechanisms of soil biota involvement in soil aggregation: a way forward with saprobic fungi? Soil Biol Biochem 88:298–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leifheit EF, Veresoglou SD, Lehmann A, Morris EK, Rillig MC (2014) Multiple factors influence the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil aggregation - a meta-analysis. Plant Soil 374:523–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li L, Tang CX, Rengel Z, Zhang FS (2003) Chickpea facilitates phosphorus uptake by intercropped wheat from an organic phosphorus source. Plant Soil 248:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li L, Li SM, Sun JH, Zhou LL, Bao XG, Zhang HG, Zhang FS (2007) Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:11192–11196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li XP, Mu YH, Cheng YB, Liu XG, Nian H (2013a) Effects of intercropping sugarcane and soybean on growth, rhizosphere soil microbes, nitrogen and phosphorus availability. Acta Physiol Plant 35:1113–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Li L, Zhang LZ, Zhang FS (2013b) Crop mixtures and the mechanisms of overyielding. In:, Levin SA, editors., encyclopedia of biodiversity, second edition, Waltham, MA: academic press. Volume 2, pp 382–395Google Scholar
  47. Linder MB, Szilvay GR, Nakari-Setälä T, Penttilä ME (2005) Hydrophobins: the protein-amphiphiles of filamentous fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:877–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mardhiah U, Caruso T, Gurnell A, Rillig MC (2014) Just a matter of time: Fungi and roots significantly and rapidly aggregate soil over four decades along the Tagliamento River. NE Italy Soil Biol Biochem 75:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McDaniel MD, Tiemann LK, Grandy AS (2014) Does agricultural crop diversity enhance soil microbial biomass and organic matter dynamics? A meta-analysis. Ecol Appl 24:560–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller RM, Jastrow JD (2000) Mycorrhizal fungi influence soil structure. In: Arbuscular mycorrhizas: physiology and function. Springer, Netherlands, pp 3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moeskops B, Sukristiyonubowo, Buchan D, Sleutel S, Herawaty L, Husen E, Saraswati R, Setyorini D, De Neve S (2010) Soil microbial communities and activities under intensive organic and conventional vegetable farming in West Java, Indonesia. Appl Soil Ecol 45:112–120Google Scholar
  52. Moeskops B, Buchan D, Sukristiyonubowo De Neve S, Gusseme BD, Widowati LR, Setyorini D, Sleutel S (2012) Soil quality indicators for intensive vegetable production systems in Java. Indonesia Ecol Indic 18:218–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mucheru-Muna M, Pypers P, Mugendi D, Kung’u J, Mugwe J, Merckx R, Vanlauwe B (2010) A staggered maize-legume intercrop arrangement robustly increases crop yields and economic returns in the highlands of Central Kenya. Field Crop Res 115:132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Oades JM (1984) Soil organic matter and structural stability: mechanisms and implications for management. Plant Soil 76:319–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oades JM, Waters AG (1991) Aggregate hierarchy in soils. Aust J Soil Res 29:815–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core team (2013) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-131. URL: https://www.CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
  57. Piotrowski JS, Denich T, Klironomos JN, Graham JM, Rillig MC (2004) The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizas on soil aggregation depend on the interaction between plant and fungal species. New Phytol 164:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Plaza-Bonilla D, Alvaro-Fuentes J, Cantero-Martinez C (2012) Soil aggregate stability as affected by fertilization type under semiarid no-tillage conditions. Soil and water management and conservation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:284–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Plaza-Bonilla D, Cantero-Martínez C, Viñas P, Álvaro-Fuentes J (2013) Soil aggregation and organic carbon protection in a no-tillage chronosequence under Mediterranean conditions. Geoderma 193-194:76–82Google Scholar
  60. Rillig MC (2004) Arbuscular mycorrhizae, glomalin, and soil aggregation. Can J Soil Sci 84:355–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rillig MC, Mummey DL (2006) Mycorrhizas and soil structure. New Phytol 171:41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rillig MC, Aguilar-Trigueros CA, Bergmann J, Verbruggen E, Veresoglou SD, Lehmann A (2014) Plant root and mycorrhizal fungal traits for understanding soil aggregation. New Phytol 205:1385–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. R package version 0.5–23.1097. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lavaan
  64. Rousk J, Bååth E, Brookes PC, Lauder CL, Lozupone C, Caporaso JG, Knight R, Fierer N (2010) Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. The ISME Journal 4:1340–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rusinamhodzi L, Corbeels M, Nyamangara J, Giller KE (2012) Maize-grain legume intercropping is an attractive option for ecological intensification that reduces climatic risk for smallholder farmers in Central Mozambique. Field Crop Res 136:12–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H (2003) Evaluating the fit of structural equation models. Methods of Psychological Research 8(2):23–74Google Scholar
  67. Senaratne R, Liyanage NDL, Soper RJ (1995) Nitrogen-fixation of and N-transfer from cowpea, mungbean and groundnut when intercropped with maize. Fertil Res 40:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sheng PP, Liu RJ, Li M (2012) Inoculation with an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and intercropping with pepper can improve soil quality and watermelon crop performance in a system previously managed by monoculture. American-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 12:1462–1468Google Scholar
  69. Siddiky MRK, Schaller J, Caruso T, Rillig MC (2012a) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and collembola non-additively increase soil aggregation. Soil Biol Biochem 47:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Siddiky MRK, Kohler J, Cosme M, Rillig MC (2012b) Soil biota effects on soil structure: interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal mycelium and collembola. Soil Biol Biochem 50:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Singh JS, Gupta VK (2018) Soil microbial biomass: a key soil driver in management of ecosystem functioning. Sci Total Environ 634:497–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Six J, Elliott ET, Paustian K (2000) Soil structure and soil organic matter II. A normalized stability index and the effect of mineralogy. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1042–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Six J, Feller C, Denef K, Ogle SM, Sa DMJC, Albrecht A (2002) Soil organic matter, biota and aggregatetion in temperate and tropical soils-effects of no-tillage. Agronomie 22:755–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, Denef K (2004) A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Tillage Res 79:7–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Six J, Frey SD, Thiet RK, Batten KM (2006) Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:555–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Snapp SS, Blackie MJ, Gilbert RA, Bezner-Kerr R, Kanyama-Phiri GY (2010) Biodiversity can support a greener revolution in Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:20840–20845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Song YN, Marschner P, Li L, Bao XG, Sun JH, Zhang FS (2007a) Community composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in the rhizosphere of intercropped wheat wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Biol Fertil Soils 44:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Song YN, Zhang FS, Marschner P, Fan FL, Gao HM, Bao XG, Sun JH, Li L (2007b) Effect of intercropping on crop yield and chemical and microbiological properties in rhizosphere of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Biol Fertil Soils 43:565–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Spohn M, Giani L (2011) Impacts of land use change on soil aggregation and aggregate stabilizing compounds as dependent on time. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1081–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Suzuki C, Takenaka M, Oka N, Nagaoka K, Karasawa T (2012) A DGGE analysis shows that crop rotation systems influence the bacterial and fungal communities in soils. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 58:288–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Polme S et al (2014) Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346:1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tiemann LK, Grandy AS, Atkinson EE, Marin-Spiotta E, McDaniel MD (2015) Crop rotational diversity enhances belowground communities and functions in an agroecosystem. Ecol Lett 18:761–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tisdall JM (1994) Possible role of soil microorganisms in aggregation in soils. Plant Soil 159:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tisdall JM, Oades JM (1982) Stabilization of soil aggregates by the root systems of ryegrass. Aust J Soil Res 17:429–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tisdall JM, Smith SE, Rengasamy P (1997) Aggregation of soil fungal hyphae. Aust J Soil Res 35:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tisdall JM, Nelson SE, Wilkinson KG, Smith SE, McKenzie BM (2012) Stabilisation of soil against wind erosion by six saprotrophic fungi. Soil Biol Biochem 50:134–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vandermeer J (1989) The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wang X, Yost RS, Linquist BA (2001) Soil aggregate size affects phosphorus desorption from highly weathered soils and plant growth. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5261–5267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wang Y, Xu J, Shen JH, Luo YM, Scheu S, Ke X (2010) Tillage, residue burning and crop rotation alter soil fungal community and water-stable aggregation in arable fields. Soil Tillage Res 107:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wang ZG, Jin X, Bao XG, Li XF, Zhao JH, Sun JH, Christie P, Li L (2014) Intercropping enhances productivity and maintains the most soil fertility properties relative to sole cropping. PLoS One 9(12):e113984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wang ZG, Bao XG, Li XF, Jin X, Zhao JH, Sun JH, Christie P, Li L (2015) Intercropping maintains soil fertility in terms of chemical properties and enzyme activities on a timescale of one decade. Plant Soil 391(1–2):265–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Willey RW (1979) Intercropping: its importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crops Abstr 32:1–10Google Scholar
  94. Xiao YB, Li L, Zhang FS (2004) Effect of root contact on interspecific competition and N tranfer between wheat and fababean using direct and indirect 15N techniques. Plant Soil 262:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Yin C, Jones KL, Peterson DE, Garrett KA, Hulbert SH, Paulitz TC (2010) Members of soil bacterial communities sensitive to tillage and crop rotation. Soil Biol Biochem 42:2111–2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zak DR, Holmes WE, White DC, Peacock AD, Tilman D (2003) Plant diversity, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem function: are there any links? Ecology 84:2042–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zhu YY, Chen HR, Fan JH, Wang YL, Chen JB, Fan JX, Yang SS, Hu LP, Leung H, Mew TW, Teng PS, Wang ZH, Mundt CC (2000) Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature 406:718–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, Coe R, Place F (2009) Trees on farm: analysis of global extent and geographical patterns of agroforestry. ICRAF Working Paper - World Agroforestry CentreGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, Key Laboratory of Plant and Soil Interactions, Chinese Ministry of Education, College of Resources and Environmental SciencesChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Soils, Fertilizers and Water-Saving AgricultureGansu Academy of Agricultural SciencesLanzhouChina
  3. 3.Institute of Crop ScienceNingxia Academy of Agriculture and ForestryYinchuanChina

Personalised recommendations