Advertisement

The use of PET/CT scanning technique for 3D visualization and quantification of real-time soil/plant interactions

Abstract

Aims

Conventional methodology using destructive sampling, which is laborious and has poor spatial and temporal resolution, has limited our understanding of soil-plant interactions. New non-invasive tomographic techniques have the potential to significantly improve our knowledge. In this study we demonstrated the simultaneous use of PET (positron emission tomography) and CT (X-ray computed tomography) to (a) non-destructively image a whole plant growing in sand, and (b) to link the observed morphology with recently assimilated C. The PET scanner was used to detect and visualize the location of the short-lived radioisotope 11C (with a half-life of 20.4 min) taken up by the plant through 11C-labelled CO2. This provided information on carbon translocation and the metabolism of photo-assimilates in the plant as well as root structure. The CT scanners yielded data on soil and root structure.

Methods

A medical PET/CT scanner was used to scan a fodder radish plant growing in a pot with test soil composed of homogenous sand. We constructed an air-plant-soil controller system (APS) to control the environmental conditions, such as CO2, temperature and light during the experiment. The plant was allowed to assimilate 11CO2 for 90 min before PET scanning was initiated. We carried out PET scanning for 60 min. Subsequently, the aerial parts of the plant was cut off and the pot was rescanned using a micro-CT scanner to obtain more detailed information on structure of the root system and the growth medium structure.

Results

The acquired PET and CT images gave images clearly visualizing the architecture and morphology of root and soil. Using a CT scanner, we were able to detect the main taproot located at 0 to 30 mm depth. With the PET scanner, we were able to measure a signal down to 82 mm below the surface of the sand. We found the highest concentration of 11C at the position of the main root. The PET images, at different time intervals, showed the translocation and metabolisation of photo-assimilates from top to root. Using the micro-CT scanner (voxel size of 90 μm), we were able to detect roots down to 100 mm depth. These findings correlated the PET signals measured down to 82 mm depth.

Conclusions

We conclude that the simultaneous use of PET and CT technologies was successfully applied for soil-plant studies. The combined PET/CT technology has potential to provide new fundamental insight into soil-plant interactions and especially into the effect of abiotic stresses in spite of the limitation due to spatial resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

References

  1. Anon (2010) How to feed a hungry world. Nature 466:531–532

  2. Amin MHG, Richards KS, Chorley RJ, Gibbs SJ, Carpenter TA, Hall LD (1996) Studies of soil-water transport by MRI. Magn Reson Imag 14:879–882

  3. Beer S, Streun M, Hombach T, Buehler J, Jahnke S, Khodaverdi V, Larue H, Minwuyelet V, Parl C, Roeb G, Schurr U, Ziemons K (2010) Design and initial performance of PlanTIS: a high-resolution positron emission tomograph for plants. Phys Med Biol 55:635–646

  4. Bronick CJ, Lal R (2005) Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma 124:3–22

  5. Hall LD, Amin MHG, Dougherty E, Sanda M, Votrubova J, Richards KS, Chorley RJ, Cislerova M (1997) MR properties of water in saturated soils and resulting loss of MRI signal in water content detection at 2 tesla. Geoderma 80:431–448

  6. Hounsfield GN (1973) Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part I. Description of system. Br J Radiol 46:1016–1022

  7. Jahnke S, Menzel MI, van Dusschoten D, Roeb GW, Bühler J, Minwuyelet S, Blümler P, Temperton VM, Hombach T, Streun M, Beer S, Khodaverdi M, Ziemons K, Coenen HH, Schurr U (2009) Combined MRI-PET dissects dynamic changes in plant structures and functions. Plant J 59:634–644

  8. Johnson MG, Tingey DT, Philips DL, Storm MJ (2001) Advancing fine root research with minirhizotrons. Environ Exp Bot 45:263–289

  9. Kawachi N, Sakamoto K, Ishii S, Fujimaki S, Suzui N, Ishioka NS, and Matsuhashi S (2006) Kinetic analysis of carbon-11-labeled carbon dioxide for studying photosynthesis in a leaf using positron emitting tracer imaging system. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci

  10. Kay BD, Munkholm LJ (2011) Managing the interactions between soil biota and their physical habitat in agroecosystems. In: Ritz K, Young IM (eds) Architecture and biology of soils: life in inner space. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 170–195

  11. Lontoc-Roy M, Dutilleul P, Prasher SO, Han L, Brouillet T, Smith DL (2006) Advances in the acquisition and analysis of CT scan data to isolate a crop root system from the soil medium and quantify root system complexity in 3-D space. Geoderma 137:231–241

  12. Nakanishi TM, Okuni Y, Furukawa J, Tanoi K, Yokota H, Ikeue N, Matsubayashi M, Uchida H, Tsiji A. (2003) Water movement in a plant sample by neutron beam analysis as well as positron emission tracer imaging system. J Radioanal Nucl Ch 255:149–153

  13. Pajor R, Falconer R, Hapca S, Otten W (2010) Modelling and quantifying the effect of heterogeneity in soil physical conditions on fungal growth. Biogeosciences 7:3731–3740

  14. Pierret A, Moran CJ, Doussan V (2005) Conventional detection methodology is limiting our ability to understand the roles and functions of fine roots. New Phytol 166:967–980

  15. Rasband W. ImageJ, 1.44b. United States National Institutes of Health (2005) Available from: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/

  16. Streun M, Brandenburg G, Larue H, Parl C, Ziemons K (2006) The data acquisition system of ClearPET Neuro—a small animal PET scanner. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 53:700–703

  17. Streun M et al (2007) PlanTIS: a positron emission tomograph for imaging 11C transport in plants. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference 6

  18. Taina IA, Heck RJ, Elliot TR (2008) Application of X-ray computed tomography to soil science: a literature review. Can J Soil Sci 88:1–20

  19. Votrubova J, Sanda M, Cislerova M, Amin MHG, Hall LD (2000) The relationships between MR parameters and the content of water in packed samples of two soils. Geoderma 95:267–282

  20. Walter J. Sync Windows, 1.4. United States National Institutes of Health (2004) Available from: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/plugins/sync-windows.html

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dirk Bender and Helene Audrain for providing the 11C. The work was funded in part by Siemens and Aarhus University Research Foundation.

Radoslaw Pajor thanks the National Environment Research Council (NERC) in the UK for support.

Author information

Correspondence to Amin Garbout.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: David James Chittleborough.

Electronic supplementary materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(WMV 21177 kb)

ESM 1

(WMV 21177 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garbout, A., Munkholm, L.J., Hansen, S.B. et al. The use of PET/CT scanning technique for 3D visualization and quantification of real-time soil/plant interactions. Plant Soil 352, 113–127 (2012) doi:10.1007/s11104-011-0983-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • X-ray computed tomography
  • Positron emission tomography
  • Soil-plant interactions
  • Soil bulk density
  • Roots
  • C assimilation