The first genetic linkage map for Fraxinus pennsylvanica and syntenic relationships with four related species
- 30 Downloads
The genetic linkage map for green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) contains 1201 DNA markers in 23 linkage groups spanning 2008.87cM. The green ash map shows stronger synteny with coffee than tomato.
Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) is an outcrossing, diploid (2n = 46) hardwood tree species, native to North America. Native ash species in North America are being threatened by the rapid spread of the emerald ash borer (EAB, Agrilus planipennis), an invasive pest from Asia. Green ash, the most widely distributed ash species, is severely affected by EAB infestation, yet few genomic resources for genetic studies and improvement of green ash are available. In this study, a total of 5712 high quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were discovered using a minimum allele frequency of 1% across the entire genome through genotyping-by-sequencing. We also screened hundreds of genomic- and EST-based microsatellite markers (SSRs) from previous de novo assemblies (Staton et al., PLoS ONE 10:e0145031, 2015; Lane et al., BMC Genom 17:702, 2016). A first genetic linkage map of green ash was constructed from 90 individuals in a full-sib family, combining 2719 SNP and 84 SSR segregating markers among the parental maps. The consensus SNP and SSR map contains a total of 1201 markers in 23 linkage groups spanning 2008.87 cM, at an average inter-marker distance of 1.67 cM with a minimum logarithm of odds of 6 and maximum recombination fraction of 0.40. Comparisons of the organization the green ash map with the genomes of asterid species coffee and tomato, and genomes of the rosid species poplar and peach, showed areas of conserved gene order, with overall synteny strongest with coffee.
KeywordsGreen ash Linkage map Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) Synteny
The authors would like to thank Wanyan Wang and Teodora Best for assistance with sample collection. We also thank Lianna Johnson and Byron Bredael for help with DNA extractions and screening SSR primers. Finally, we appreciate assistance from Nicole Zembower and Maureen Mailander on seedling planting and field maintenance. This work was supported by grants from NSF’s Plant Genome Research Program (IOS-1025974) to JEC and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Appropriations under Project PEN04532 and Accession number 1000326.
DW conducted all of the research for her dissertation and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. JK conducted the controlled pollinations, reared the seedlings, provided the seedlings for mapping, and provided comments and edits on the manuscript. MC provided nursery space and advice for rearing the seedlings, and provided comments and edits on the manuscript. JC obtained funding, supervised the research, and provided comments and edits on the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no competing interests exit.
- Barreneche T, Bodenes C, Lexer C, Trontin J-F, Fluch S, Streiff R, Plomion C, Roussel G, Steinkellner H, Burg K, Favre J-M, Glössl J, Kremer A (1998) A genetic linkage map of Quercus robur L. (pedunculate oak) based on RAPD, SCAR, microsatellite, minisatellite, isozyme and 5S rDNA markers. Theor Appl Genet 97:1090–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burns RM, Honkala BH (1990) Silvics of North America, vol 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook, Washington, p 877Google Scholar
- Clarke JD (2009) Cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) DNA miniprep for plant dna isolation. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2009: pdb.prot5177Google Scholar
- Gabriel S, Ziaugra L, Tabbaa D (2001) SNP Genotyping Using the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX Platform. In: Haines JL, Korf BR, Morton CC (eds) Current protocols in human genetics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Knight KS, Herms D, Plumb R, Sawyer E, Spalink D, Pisarczyk E, Wiggin B, Kappler R, Ziegler E, Menard K (2012) Dynamics of surviving ash (Fraxinus spp.) populations in areas long infested by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on genetics host–parasite interactions in forestry, USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station, PSW-GTR-240, 143–152Google Scholar
- Pootakham W, Jomchai N, Ruang-areerate P, Shearman JR, Sonthirod C, Sangsrakru D, Tragoonrung S, Tangphatsornruang S (2015) Genome-wide SNP discovery and identification of QTL associated with agronomic traits in oil palm using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). Genomics 105:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Staton M, Best T, Khodwekar S, Owusu S, Xu T, Xu Y, Jennings T, Cronn R, Arumuganathan AK, Coggeshall M, Gailing O, Liang H, Romero-Severson J, Schlarbaum S, Carlson JE (2015) Preliminary genomic characterization of ten hardwood tree species from multiplexed low coverage whole genome sequencing. PLoS ONE 10:e0145031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tuskan GA, Difazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, Hellsten U, Putnam N, Ralph S, Rombauts S, Salamov A, Schein J, Sterck L, Aerts A, Bhalerao RR, Bhalerao RP,. Blaudez D, Boerjan W, Brun A, Brunner A, Busov V, Campbell M, Carlson J et al (2006) The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313:1596–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Ooijen JW (2006) JoinMap 4: Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Kyazma BV, WageningenGoogle Scholar
- Wang K, Wang Z, Li F, Ye W, Wang J, Song G, Yue Z, Cong L, Shang H, Zhu S, Zou C, Li Q, Yuan Y, Lu C, Wei H, Gou C, Zheng Z, Yin Y, Zhang X, Liu K, Wang B, Song C, Shi N, Kohel RJ, Percy RG, Yu JZ, Zhu Y-X, Wang J, Yu S (2012) The draft genome of a diploid cotton Gossypium raimondii. Nat Genet 44:1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wu Y, Close TJ, Lonardi S (2008) On the accurate construction of consensus genetic maps. Comput Syst Bioinform Conf 7:285–296Google Scholar