Predicting early post-operative remission in pituitary adenomas: evaluation of the modified knosp classification
Cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenomas is an important prognostic factor for evaluating the possibilities of complete remission and to guide patient management. A widely used Magnetic Resonance Imaging grading system, suggested by Knosp in 1993, has recently been revised by the same group. The aims of our study were to apply this revised grading system to our surgical series, to determine its association with surgical outcomes, gross-total resection (GTR) and endocrinological remission (ER), paying particular attention to grades 3A and 3B, which represent the novelty of this revised classification.
We included consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery for a macroadenoma from September 2012 to December 2016. MRI images were reviewed and classified according to the revised Knosp classification. Surgical reports indicated the intra-operative CS invasion. GTR and ER were evaluated on 3-months post-operative MRI and endocrine evaluation.
254 patients were included in this study. We found a total rate of cavernous sinus invasion of 18.4%. Different outcomes were observed for each grade, with an increased rate of cavernous sinus invasion with each grade. Per-operative rates of invasion were 61.5 and 78.6% in grades 3A and 3B respectively. GTR was negatively correlated with the grade, while rates were 55.8% and 30.0% for grades 3A and 3B respectively.
The revised Knosp radiological classification contributes to the prediction of surgical outcomes and early ER in pituitary adenomas. To manage, as precisely as possible, the risk of early recurrence in pituitary adenomas, clinicians should also consider other recognized prognostic factors, such as the proliferative status of the tumor.
KeywordsPituitary adenoma Classification Cavernous sinus Prognosis Remission
- 5.Zaidi HA, Awad A-W, Bohl MA et al (2016) Comparison of outcomes between a less experienced surgeon using a fully endoscopic technique and a very experienced surgeon using a microscopic transsphenoidal technique for pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg 124:596–604. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.4.JNS15102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Zoli M, Milanese L, Bonfatti R et al (2016) Cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenomas: role of endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Neurosurg Sci 60:485–494Google Scholar
- 17.Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C (1993) Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 33:610–617 (Discussion 617–618) Google Scholar
- 19.Dehdashti AR, Ganna A, Karabatsou K, Gentili F (2008) Pure endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas: early surgical results in 200 patients and comparison with previous microsurgical series. Neurosurgery 62:1006–1015. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000325862.83961.12 (Discussion 1015–1017) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Lee S-H, Park J-S, Lee S et al (2016) Parasellar extension grades and surgical extent in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: a single surgeon’s consecutive series with the aspects of reliability and clinical validity. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 59:577–583. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.6.577 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Castinetti F, Dufour H, Gaillard S, et al (2012) Consensus de la Société Française d’Endocrinologie sur les adénomes hypohysaires non fonctionnelsGoogle Scholar
- 27.Losa M, Donofrio CA, Barzaghi R, Mortini P (2013) Presentation and surgical results of incidentally discovered nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: evidence for a better outcome independently of other patients’ characteristics. Eur J Endocrinol 169:735–742. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-0515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Scheithauer BW, Jaap AJ, Horvath E et al (2000) Clinically silent corticotroph tumors of the pituitary gland. Neurosurgery 47:723–729 (Discussion 729–730) Google Scholar
- 36.Yamada S, Ohyama K, Taguchi M et al (2007) A study of the correlation between morphological findings and biological activities in clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery 61:580–584. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000290906.53685.79 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Brue T, Delemer B, French Society of Endocrinology (SFE) work group on the consensus on hyperprolactinemia (2007) Diagnosis and management of hyperprolactinemia: expert consensus—French Society of Endocrinology. Ann Endocrinol 68:58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ando.2006.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Lelotte J, Mourin A, Fomekong E et al (2018) Both invasiveness and proliferation criteria predict recurrence of non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas after surgery: a retrospective analysis of a monocentric cohort of 120 patients. Eur J Endocrinol 178:237–246. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-0965 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Asioli S, Righi A, Iommi M et al (2019) Validation of a clinicopathological score for the prediction of post-surgical evolution of pituitary adenoma: retrospective analysis on 566 patients from a tertiary care centre. Eur J Endocrinol 180:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-18-0749 CrossRefGoogle Scholar