, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 373–380 | Cite as

Assessment of static and dynamic plantar data of patients with acromegaly

  • Suleyman Nahit SendurEmail author
  • Seda Oguz
  • Selcuk Dagdelen
  • Tomris Erbas



To determine both static and dynamic plantar data of acromegalic subjects while barefoot.


Seventy acromegalic patients and 48 age-, sex-, weight- and height-matched healthy controls were included. Plantar variables were measured using the footscan gait system. The data included the width and length of each foot, relative force distribution in each quadrant, mean force applied to each foot and maximum pressure while walking. Maximum pressure data were obtained from ten parts of the foot. Injury risk assessments of five different regions were performed. To analyze balance, center of pressure (CoP) measurements were performed. The patients with acromegaly were compared with the controls. Furthermore, a comparison of patients with active and controlled acromegaly was performed.


The foot was wider in acromegalic patients. The mean force on each foot was higher in cases of acromegaly (acromegaly: 1027 ± 180 N, control: 908 ± 180 N, p = 0.001). In the acromegalic individuals, the maximum pressure in the midfoot was higher, while the medial heel maximum pressure was lower (midfoot maximum pressure acromegaly: 11.3 ± 3.5 N/cm2, control: 8.9 ± 3.7 N/cm2, p = < 0.001). Injury risk was similar. CoP measurements elicited intact balance. In terms of static and dynamic plantar data, there was no difference between patients with active and controlled acromegaly.


This is the first study to demonstrate that compared with healthy controls, patients with acromegaly experience great force on their feet while standing and high pressure in the midfoot during walking. Podiatric evaluation, custom molded orthotics and individualized rehabilitation programs for acromegalic patients may provide better force and pressure distribution throughout the foot and improve gait and skeletal symptoms.


Acromegaly Footscan Plantar pressure Center of pressure 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the institutional noninterventional clinical research ethics board with project no: GO 17/846 and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Katznelson L, Laws ER Jr, Melmed S, Molitch ME, Murad MH, Utz A, Wass JA (2014) Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(11):3933–3951. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colao A, Ferone D, Marzullo P, Lombardi G (2004) Systemic complications of acromegaly: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Endocr Rev 25(1):102–152. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biermasz NR, Pereira AM, Smit JW, Romijn JA, Roelfsema F (2005) Morbidity after long-term remission for acromegaly: persisting joint-related complaints cause reduced quality of life. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90(5):2731–2739. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Claessen KM, Ramautar SR, Pereira AM, Smit JW, Roelfsema F, Romijn JA, Kroon HM, Kloppenburg M, Biermasz NR (2012) Progression of acromegalic arthropathy despite long-term biochemical control: a prospective, radiological study. Eur J Endocrinol 167(2):235–244. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biermasz NR, van Thiel SW, Pereira AM, Hoftijzer HC, van Hemert AM, Smit JW, Romijn JA, Roelfsema F (2004) Decreased quality of life in patients with acromegaly despite long-term cure of growth hormone excess. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(11):5369–5376. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tagliafico A, Resmini E, Ferone D, Martinoli C (2011) Musculoskeletal complications of acromegaly: what radiologists should know about early manifestations. Radiol Med 116(5):781–792. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barkan AL (2001) Acromegalic arthropathy. Pituitary 4(4):263–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Colao A, Pivonello R, Scarpa R, Vallone G, Ruosi C, Lombardi G (2005) The acromegalic arthropathy. J Endocrinol Investig 28(8 Suppl):24–31Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nagulesparen M, Trickey R, Davies MJ, Jenkins JS (1976) Muscle changes in acromegaly. Br Med J 2(6041):914–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guedes da Silva DP, Guimaraes FS, Dias CM, Guimaraes Sde A, Kasukisde L, Gadelha MR, Camilo GB, Lopes AJ (2013) On the functional capacity and quality of life of patients with acromegaly: are they candidates for rehabilitation programs? J Phys Ther Sci 25(11):1497–1501. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lopes AJ, da Silva DP, Kasuki L, Gadelha MR, Camilo GB, Guimaraes FS (2014) Posture and balance control in patients with acromegaly: results of a cross-sectional study. Gait Posture 40(1):154–159. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Homem TS, Guimaraes FS, Soares MS, Kasuki L, Gadelha MR, Lopes AJ (2017) Balance control and peripheral muscle function in aging: a comparison between individuals with acromegaly and healthy subjects. J Aging Phys Act 25(2):218–227. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Franklyn-Miller A, Bilzon J, Wilson C, McCrory P (2014) Can RSScan footscan((R)) D3D software predict injury in a military population following plantar pressure assessment? A prospective cohort study. Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland) 24(1):6–10. Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Franklyn-Miller A, Wilson C, Bilzon J, McCrory P (2011) Foot orthoses in the prevention of injury in initial military training: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 39(1):30–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johanson NA, Vigorita VJ, Goldman AB, Salvati EA (1983) Acromegalic arthropathy of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 173:130–139Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lieberman SA, Bjorkengren AG, Hoffman AR (1992) Rheumatologic and skeletal changes in acromegaly. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am 21(3):615–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Orlin MN, McPoil TG (2000) Plantar pressure assessment. Phys Ther 80(4):399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismHacettepe University Medical SchoolAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations