, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 443–444 | Cite as

AcroVoice: the controversial values in reflecting acromegaly disease activity

  • Zihao Wang
  • Bing XingEmail author


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the author.


  1. 1.
    Jackson Y, Flood E, Rhoten S, Janssen EM, Lundie M (2019) AcroVoice: eliciting the patients’ perspective on acromegaly disease activity. Pituitary 22(1):62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Katznelson L, Laws ER Jr, Melmed S, Molitch ME, Murad MH, Utz A, Wass JA, Endocrine Society (2014) Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(11):3933–3951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crespo I, Valassi E, Webb SM (2017) Update on quality of life in patients with acromegaly. Pituitary 20(1):185–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical CollegeChinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.China Pituitary Disease Registry CenterChinese Pituitary Adenoma Cooperative GroupBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations