Physicians’ awareness of gadolinium retention and MRI timing practices in the longitudinal management of pituitary tumors: a “Pituitary Society” survey
In view of mounting attention related to possible brain retention of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in patients with normal renal function, our purpose was to detail results from a survey of pituitary experts to assess: 1) the timing interval and frequency of pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following surgical and/or medical and/or radiation therapy of pituitary tumors, 2) awareness of the types of GBCAs used and their possible safety issues.
The Pituitary Society Education Committee composed a survey with 12 multiple choice questions, 8 of which specifically addressed the time interval and frequency of MRI in the longitudinal management of pituitary tumors. The survey was distributed at two meetings; the International Pituitary Neurosurgeons Society conference in San Diego, CA, on February 18th, 2018, and the Pituitary Society Membership and Career Development Forum, Chicago, IL on March 18th, 2018.
There is consensus among pituitary endocrinologists and neurosurgeons that long-term repeated imaging is recommended in most pituitary tumors, although the precise strategy of timing varied depending on the specialist group and the specific clinical context of the adenoma. The data also suggest that International Pituitary Neurosurgeons Society neurosurgeons, as well as Pituitary Society neuroendocrinologists, are sometimes unaware of which contrast agents are used by their institution, and many are also unaware that evidence of long-term brain retention has been reported with the use of GBCAs in patients with normal function.
International pituitary endocrinologists and pituitary neurosurgeons experts suggest ongoing MRIs for the management of pituitary tumors; strategies vary based on clinical context, but also on individual experience and practice.
KeywordsContrast Gadolinium Safety Pituitary Tumor Imaging Adenoma Neuroendocrinologists Neurosurgeons Survey
No funding has been received for this project.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest for this project.
- 3.Levine D, McDonald RJ, Kressel HY. Gadolinium retention after contrast-enhanced MRI. JAMA. 2018Google Scholar
- 4.Moreno J, Vaz N, Soler J, Carrasco J, Podlipnick S (2018) High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images in melanoma patients receiving macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast. J Radiol Diagn Methods 1:101Google Scholar
- 6.McDonald RJ, Levine D, Weinreb J, Kanal E, Davenport MS, Ellis JH et al. Gadolinium retention: a research roadmap from the 2018 NIH/ACR/RSNA workshop on gadolinium chelates. Radiology. 2018:181151Google Scholar
- 8.Rasschaert M, Emerit A, Fretellier N, Factor C, Robert P, Idee JM et al (2018) Gadolinium retention, brain T1 hyperintensity, and endogenous metals: a comparative study of macrocyclic versus linear gadolinium chelates in renally sensitized rats. Investig Radiol 53(6):328–337Google Scholar
- 10.Fitzgerald RT, Agarwal V, Hoang JK, Gaillard F, Dixon A, Kanal E. The impact of gadolinium deposition on radiology practice: an international survey of radiologists. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018Google Scholar
- 20.Kanda T, Fukusato T, Matsuda M, Toyoda K, Oba H, Kotoku J et al (2015) Gadolinium-based contrast agent accumulates in the brain even in subjects without severe renal dysfunction: evaluation of autopsy brain specimens with inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. Radiology 276(1):228–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Errante Y, Cirimele V, Mallio CA, Di Lazzaro V, Zobel BB, Quattrocchi CC (2014) Progressive increase of T1 signal intensity of the dentate nucleus on unenhanced magnetic resonance images is associated with cumulative doses of intravenously administered gadodiamide in patients with normal renal function, suggesting dechelation. Investig Radiol 49(10):685–690Google Scholar