Advertisement

Realizing race

  • Aaron M. GriffithEmail author
Article

Abstract

A prominent way of explaining how race is socially constructed appeals to social positions and social structures. On this view, the construction of a person’s race is understood in terms of the person occupying a certain social position in a social structure. The aim of this paper is to give a metaphysically perspicuous account of this form of race construction. Analogous to functionalism about mental states, I develop an account of a ‘race structure’ in which various races (Black, White, Asian, etc.) are functionally defined social positions. Individual persons occupy these social positions by ‘playing the role’ characteristic of those positions. The properties by which a person plays a race role, are the realizers for one’s race. I characterize the social construction of a person’s race in terms of a realization relation that satisfies a ‘subset’ condition on the social powers of raced persons. Races, on this view, are functionally defined, multiply realizable social kinds. The final section of the paper outlines some explanatory benefits of the account.

Keywords

Race Social construction Realization Functionalism 

Notes

References

  1. Alcoff, L. (1995). Mestizo identity. In N. Zack Lanham (Ed.), American mixed race: The culture of microdiversity (pp. 257–278). MD: Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham.Google Scholar
  2. Alcoff, L. (2006). Visible identities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Appiah, K. (1994). Identity, authenticity, survival: Multicultural societies and social reproduction. In Amy Gutman (Ed.), Multiculturalism (pp. 149–163). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ásta, (2013). The social construction of human kinds. Hypatia, 28(4), 716–732.Google Scholar
  5. Ásta, (2018). Categories we live by. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barnes, E. (2017). Realism about social structure. Philosophical Studies, 174(10), 2417–2433.Google Scholar
  7. Bernstein, S. (manuscript). The metaphysics of intersectionality.Google Scholar
  8. Block, N. (1980). Troubles with functionalism. In N. Block (Ed.), Readings in the philosophy of psychology (pp. 268–305). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blum, L. (2010). Racialized groups: The sociohistorical consensus. The Monist, 93(2), 298–320.Google Scholar
  10. Boxill, B. (2001). Introduction. In B. Boxill (Ed.), Race and racism (pp. 1–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Burman, Å. (2007). Power and social ontology. Malmö: Bokbox Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Clapp, L. (2001). Disjunctive properties: Multiple realizations. Journal of Philosophy, 98(3), 111–136.Google Scholar
  13. Diaz-Leon, E. (2015). In defense of historical constructivism about races? Ergo, 2(21), 547–562.Google Scholar
  14. Fodor, J. (1968). Psychological explanation. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  15. Funkhouser, E. (2007). Multiple realizability. Philosophy Compass, 2(2), 303–315.Google Scholar
  16. Garcia, J. (2005). Surviving race, ethnicity, and nationality: A challenge for the 21st century . Lanham: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Giddens, A. (1981). A contemporary critique of historical materialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Glasgow, J. (2009). A theory of race. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Gooding-Williams, R. (1998). Race, multiculturalism, and democracy. Constellations, 5, 18–41.Google Scholar
  20. Griffith, A. M. (2018a). Social construction and grounding. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 97(2), 393–409.Google Scholar
  21. Griffith, A. M. (2018b). Social construction: big-G grounding, small-g realization. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 175 (1), 241–260.Google Scholar
  22. Hacking, I. (1995). The looping effects of human kinds. In Dan Sperber, David Premack, & Ann J. Permack (Eds.), Causal cognition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hardimon, M. (1994). Role obligations. Journal of Philosophy, XCI(7), 33–63.Google Scholar
  24. Hardimon, M. (2014). The concept of socialrace. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 40(1), 69–90.Google Scholar
  25. Haslanger, S. (2003). Social construction: The ‘debunking’ project. In F. Schmitt (Ed.), Socializing metaphysics (pp. 301–325). Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  26. Haslanger, S. (2012a). Social construction: Myth and reality. In S. Haslanger (Ed.), Resisting reality (pp. 138–218). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Haslanger, S. (2012b). Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) do we want them to be? In S. Haslanger (Ed.), Resisting reality (pp. 221–247). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Haslanger, S. (2012c). Future genders? Future races? In S. Haslanger (Ed.), Resisting reality (pp. 248–272). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Haslanger, S. (2012d). You mixed? Racial identity without racial biology. In S. Haslanger (Ed.), Resisting reality (pp. 273–297). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Haslanger, S. (2012e). A social constructionist analysis of race. In S. Haslanger (Ed.), Resisting Reality (pp. 298–310). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Haslanger, S. (2012f). But mom, crop-tops are cute! In S. Haslanger (Ed.), Resisting reality (pp. 406–428). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Haslanger, S. (2014). Race, intersectionality, and method: A reply to critics. Philosophical Studies, 171(1), 109–119.Google Scholar
  33. Haslanger, S. (2016). What is a (social) structural explanation? Philosophical Studies, 173, 113–130.Google Scholar
  34. Haug, M. (2010). Realization, determination, and mechanism. Philosophical Studies, 150, 313–330.Google Scholar
  35. Hochman, A. (2017). Replacing race: Interactive constructionism about racialized groups. Ergo, 4(3), 61–92.Google Scholar
  36. Jeffers, C. (2013). The cultural theory of race: Yet another look at Du Bois’s the conservation of races. Ethics, 123, 403–426.Google Scholar
  37. Jenkins, K. (2016). Ontic injustice. Dissertation, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
  38. Kincaid, H. (1990). Assessing functional explanations in the social sciences. In Proceedings of the Biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association (pp. 341–354).Google Scholar
  39. Koslicki, K. (2008). The structure of objects. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lewis, D. (1980). Mad pain and martian pain. In Ned Block (Ed.), Readings in philosophy of psychology (Vol. I, pp. 216–232). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mallon, R. (2003). Social construction, social roles, and stability. In F. Schmitt (Ed.), Socializing metaphysics: The nature of social reality (pp. 327–355). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  42. Mallon, R. (2004). Passing, traveling and reality: Social constructionism and the metaphysics of race. Nous, 38(4), 644–673.Google Scholar
  43. Mallon, R. (2016). The construction of human kinds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Michaels, W. (1994). The no-drop rule. Critical Inquiry, 20, 758–769.Google Scholar
  45. Mills, C. (1997). The racial contract. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mills, C. (1998a). But what are you really? In C. Mills (Ed.), Blackness visible (pp. 41–66). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Mills, C. (1998b). Dark ontologies: Blacks, Jews, and white supremacy? In C. Mills (Ed.), Blackness visible (pp. 67–95). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Neander, K. (1991). The teleological notion of function. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 69(4), 454–468.Google Scholar
  49. Neander, K. (1999). Functions and teleology. In Hardcastle (Ed.), Where biology meets psychology: Philosophical essays (pp. 3–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Neander, K. (2018). Teleological theories of mental content. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. E. N. Zalta (Ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/content-teleological/
  51. Omi, M., & Winant, H. (2015). Racial formation in the United States (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Outlaw, L. (1996). On race and philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Pereboom, D. (2011). Consciousness and the prospects of physicalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Pereboom, D., & Kornblith, H. (1991). The metaphysics of irreducibility. Philosophical Studies, 63(2), 125–145.Google Scholar
  55. Porpora, D. (1989). Four concepts of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 19(2), 195–211.Google Scholar
  56. Putnam, H. (1975). Minds and machines. In Mind, language, and reality (pp. 362–385). Cambridge. MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Ritchie, K. (2013). What are groups? Philosophical Studies, 166, 257–272.Google Scholar
  58. Ritchie, K. (2015). The metaphysics of social groups. Philosophy Compass, 10(5), 310–321.Google Scholar
  59. Ritchie, K. (forthcoming). Social structures and the ontology of social groups. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.Google Scholar
  60. Root, M. (2000). How we divide the world. Philosophy of Science, 67(3), S628–S639.Google Scholar
  61. Ruben, D.-H. (1985). The metaphysics of the social world. Boston, MA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Sawyer, K. (2002). Nonreductive individualism: Part 1—Supervenience and wild disjunction. Philosophy and the Social Sciences, 32(4), 537–559.Google Scholar
  63. Sawyer, K. (2003). Nonreductive individualism Part II—Social causation. Philosophy and the Social Sciences, 33(2), 203–224.Google Scholar
  64. Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  65. Searle, J. (2010). Making the social world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Shapiro, S. (1997). Philosophy of mathematics: Structure and ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Shelby, T. (2005). We who are dark: The philosophical foundations of black solidarity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Shoemaker, S. (1981). Some varieties of functionalism. Philosophical Topics, 12, 93–119.Google Scholar
  69. Shoemaker, S. (2001). Realization and mental causation. In C. Gillett & B. Loewer (Eds.), The Proceedings of the twentieth world congress of philosophy (pp. 23–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Shoemaker, S. (2007). Physical realization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Shoemaker, S. (2011). Realization, powers, and property identity. The Monist, 94(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
  72. Sober, E. (1985). Panglossian functionalism and the philosophy of mind. Synthese, 64(2), 165–193.Google Scholar
  73. Sundstrom, R. (2002). Race as a human kind. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 28(1), 91–115.Google Scholar
  74. Taylor, P. (2000). Appiah’s uncompleted argument: Du Bois and the reality of race. Social Theory and Practice, 26(1), 103–128.Google Scholar
  75. Taylor, P. (2013). Race: A philosophical introduction. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  76. Thomasson, A. (2016). The ontology of social groups. Synthese,.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1185-y.Google Scholar
  77. Wilson, J. (1999). How superduper does a physicalist supervenience need to be? Philosophical Quarterly, 50(194), 33–52.Google Scholar
  78. Wilson, R. (2001). Two views of realization. Philosophical Studies, 104(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  79. Wilson, R. (2004). Boundaries of the mind: The individual in the fragile sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Wilson, J. (2011). Non-reductive realization and the powers-based subset strategy. The Monist, 94(1), 121–154.Google Scholar
  81. Witt, C. (2011). The metaphysics of gender. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Yablo, S. (1992). Mental causation. The Philosophical Review, 101(2), 245–280.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The College of William & MaryWilliamsburgUSA

Personalised recommendations