Philosophical Studies

, Volume 175, Issue 5, pp 1039–1056 | Cite as

Constructing race: racialization, causal effects, or both?

Article
  • 130 Downloads

Abstract

Social constructionism about race is a common view, but there remain questions about what exactly constitutes constructed race. Some hold that our concepts and conceptual practices construct race, and some hold that the causal consequences of these concepts and conceptual practices also play a role. But there is a third option, which is that the causal effects of our concepts and conceptual practices constitute race, but not the concepts and conceptual practices themselves. This paper reconsiders an argument for the reality of race that grows out of the role of racial kinds in social scientific generalizations. It then uses recent work on the correlation of racial attitudes with behaviors to raise questions about the sufficiency, and perhaps also the necessity, of our concepts and conceptual practices in constituting constructed race, thus understood.

Keywords

Race Social construction Practices Material effects 

References

  1. Anderson, E. (2010). The imperative of integration. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ásta. (in press). Categories we live by. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boyd, R. (1999). Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In R. A. Wilson (Ed.), Species: New interdisciplinary essays (pp. 141–186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N. J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Davidson, A. I. (2001). The emergence of sexuality : Historical epistemology and the formation of concepts. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Devitt, M., & Sterelny, K. (1999). Language and reality : An introduction to the philosophy of language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Diaz-Leon, E. (2015). What is social construction? European Journal of Philosophy, 23(4), 1137–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fodor, J. A. (1987). Psychosemantics : The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, vol. I: An introduction. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  10. Glasgow, J., & Woodward, J. M. (2015). Basic racial realism. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1(3), 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenwald, A., & Banaji, M. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Statistically small effects of the implicit association test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(4), 553–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenwald, A. G., et al. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hacking, I. (1986). Making up people. In T. C. Heller, M. Sosna, & D. E. Wellbery (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality, and the self in western thought (pp. 222–236). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hacking, I. (2007). Kinds of people: Moving targets. Proceedings of the British Academy, 151, 285–318.Google Scholar
  18. Haslanger, S. (1995). Ontology and social construction. Philosophical Topics, 23(2), 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haslanger, S. A. (2012). Resisting reality : Social construction and social critique. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, J. (2017). The racial wealth gap: How African Americans have been shortchanged out of the materials to build wealth. Working Economics Blog. http://www.epi.org/blog/the-racial-wealth-gap-how-african-americans-have-been-shortchanged-out-of-the-materials-to-build-wealth/. Accessed 1 November 2017.
  21. Lewis, D. (1970). How to define theoretical terms. Journal of Philosophy, 67, 426–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lewis, D. (1972). Psychophysical and theoretical identifications. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 50, 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mallon, R. (2003). Social construction, social roles and stability. In F. Schmitt (Ed.), Socializing metaphysics (pp. 327–353). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  24. Mallon, R. (2016). The construction of human kinds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mallon, R. (2017). Social roles and reification. In J. Kiverstein (Ed.), Routledge handbook of social mind (pp. 431–446). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Mallon. (ms). Implicit attitudes, accumulation mechanisms, and racial disparities.Google Scholar
  27. Nosek, B. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 565–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nosek, B. A., et al. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Omi, M., & Winant, H. (1994). Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., & Tetlock, P. E. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Root, M. (2000). How we divide the world. Philosophy of Science, 67, S628–S639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rothstein, R. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. New York, London: Liveright Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  33. Schuman, H., et al. (1997). Racial attitudes in America: Trends and interpretations. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, T. W., Peter, M., Michael, H., & Jibum, K. General Social Surveys, 1972–2016 [machine-readable data file]/Principal Investigator, Tom W. Smith; Co-Principal Investigator, Peter V. Marsden; Co-Principal Investigator, Michael Hout; Sponsored by National Science Foundation. NORC ed. Chicago: NORC at the University of Chicago [producer and distributor]. Data accessed from the GSS Data Explorer website at gssdataexplorer.norc.org.
  37. Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M., Nadal, K. L., et al. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sundstrom, R. (2003). Race and place: Social space in the production of human kinds. Philosophy and Geography, 6(1), 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor, P. C. (2013). Race: A philosophical introduction. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  40. Valian, V. (1998). Why so slow?: The advancement of women. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Zack, N. (1999). Philosophy and racial paradigms. Journal of Value Inquiry, 33, 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zack, N. (2002). Philosophy of science and race. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Washington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations