An evaluation of mental health clinical pharmacist independent prescribers within general practice in remote and rural Scotland
- 84 Downloads
Background A 12-month pilot was implemented in two general practices in remote and rural Scotland, with patients referred by general practitioners to specialist mental health pharmacist independent prescribers. Objective The objective was to evaluate the pilot service from the perspectives of the patients and the care team. Methods The pharmacists routinely recorded patient-specific data of all clinical issues and their actions at the time of each consultation. Further datasets comprised baseline and follow-up Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and/or Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) rating scales, a patient survey and interviews with members of the care team. Results Of the 75 patients, two-thirds (n = 47, 62.7%) were referred with a diagnosis of mixed depression and anxiety. There were 324 consultations (median 3, IQR 2–5, range 1–14) and 181 prescribing actions. At pilot completion, 34 patients (45.3%) had PHQ-9 and/or GAD-7 scores reduced by 50%. Patient questionnaires and staff interviews generated positive responses. Conclusion This pilot has provided evidence that specialist mental health pharmacist independent prescribers delivered quality care to patients with diagnoses of moderate to severe depression and/or anxiety. Whilst accepting study limitations, there is potential to translate the pilot model of care to sustained services throughout general practice.
KeywordsAnxiety disorders Depressive disorders Independent prescriber Pharmacist Primary care Research evaluation Scotland
The authors would like to acknowledge all participants who took part in this pilot. We also thank Thom Shaw, Karen Macaskill, Michael Perera, general prcatitioners and practice staff at Glen Mor and Alness/Invergordon Medical Practices, Lochaber and Easter Ross; consultant psychiatrists and community mental health teams for their support and encouragement.
Funding for the pilot service was provided by the Scottish Government’s Primary Care Transformation Fund. Funding for the evaluation was provided by the Highland Pharmacy Education and Research Centre.
Conflicts of interest
The authors of the evaluation have no conflicts to declare.
- 3.Weeks G, George J, MacLure K, Stewart D. Non-medical prescribing versus medical prescribing for acute and chronic disease management in primary and secondary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.Google Scholar
- 9.Scottish Government. Mental Health Strategy 2017-27—a 10 year vision. http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2017/03/1750/0. Accessed June 2019.
- 10.Scottish Government. Achieving Excellence in Pharmaceutical Care. http://www.gov.scot/publications/2017/08/4589. Accessed June 2019.