Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 1482–1489 | Cite as

The association of clopidogrel and 2-oxo-clopidogrel plasma levels and the 40 months clinical outcome after primary PCI

  • Milan Pavlovic
  • Svetlana Apostolovic
  • Dragana Stokanovic
  • Jelena Lilic
  • Sandra S. Konstantinovic
  • Jelena B. Zvezdanovic
  • Valentina Marinkovic
  • Valentina N. NikolicEmail author
Research Article
  • 126 Downloads

Abstract

Background A significant number of ischemic events occur even when adhering to dual antiplatelet therapy including aspirin and clopidogrel. Objectives The aim of our study was to determine predictors of long-term patient clinical outcome, among variables such as prodrug clopidogrel and intermediary metabolite 2-oxoclopidogrel concentrations, as well as patients’ clinical characteristics. Setting Department for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome in tertiary teaching hospital, Serbia. Methods This study enrolled 88 consecutive patients with first STEMI, treated with primary PCI, within 6 h of the chest pain onset and followed them 40 months. On the third day of hospitalization, blood samples were collected from each patient to measure clopidogrel and its metabolite 2-oxo-clopidogrel concentration by UHPLC-DAD-MS method. Main outcome measure Mortality from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke or hospitalization for urgent myocardial revascularization or heart failure. Results The composite clinical outcome of cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for urgent myocardial revascularization or heart failure, was registered in 31 patients (35.2%) during the 40-month follow-up. Lower clopidogrel (p < 0.05) and dose-adjusted clopidogrel concentrations (p < 0.05) were associated with the higher incidence of composite outcome events. Their low plasma concentrations may be predicted by fentanyl administration (p < 0.001) and creatinine clearance (p < 0.01). The decrease in dose-adjusted clopidogrel unit for each ng/ml/mg increases the risk 21.7 times (p < 0.05). Conclusion Clopidogrel dose-adjusted plasma concentration in STEMI patients, as well as multivessel coronary artery disease, showed significance in predicting an unfavorable composite clinical outcome after 40-month follow-up.

Keywords

Clinical outcome Clopidogrel Coronary artery disease Fentalyl- co-medication STEMI 

Notes

Funding

This study was partially funded by Grant Nos. III 41018, 45001, and 34012 from the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37:267–315.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levine G, Bates E, Bittl J, Brindis R, Fihn S, Fleisher S, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1082–115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen ZM, Jiang LX, Chen YP, Xie JH, Pan HC, Peto R, et al. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1607–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, Shen L, Walker JR, Simon T, et al. Genetic variants in ABCBI and CYP2C19 and cardiovascular outcomes after treatment with clopidogrel and prasugrel in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial: a pharmacogenetic analysis. Lancet. 2010;376:1312–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brandt JT, Close SL, Iturria SJ, Raupe CD, Farid NA, Ernest CS, et al. Common polymorphisms of CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel but not prasugrel. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5:2429–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giusti V, Abbate R. Response to antiplatelet treatment: from genes to outcome. Lancet. 2010;376:1278–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taubert D, von Beckerath N, Grimberg G, Lazar A, Jung N, Goeser T, et al. Impact of P-glycoprotein on clopidogrel absorption. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006;80:486–501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jakubowski JA, Angiolillo DJ, Zhou C, Small DS, Moser BA, Ten Berg JM, et al. The influence of body size on the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic response to clopidogrel and prasugrel: a retrospective analysis of the FEATHER study. Thromb Res. 2014;134:552–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Angiolillo DJ, Jakubowski JA, Ferreiro JL, Tello-Montoliu A, Rollini F, Franchi F, et al. Impaired responsiveness to the platelet P2Y12 receptor antagonist clopidogrel in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1005–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    James S, Angiolillo DJ, Comel JH, Erlinge D, Husted S, Kopgpu F, et al. Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and diabetes: a substudy from the PLATelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) trial. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:3006–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bonello L, Camoin-Jau L, Armero S, Com O, Arques S, Burignat-Bonello C, et al. Tailored clopidogrel loading dose according to platelet reactivity monitoring to prevent acute and subacute stent thrombosis. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:5–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ernest CS, Small DS, Rohatagi S, Salazar DE, Wallentin L, Winters KJ, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel and clopidogrel in aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Pliarmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2008;35:593–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jung JA, Kim T-E, Kim J-R, Kim M-J, Huh W, Park K-M, et al. The pharmacokinetics and safety of a fixed-dose combination of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel compared with the concurrent administration of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel in healthy subjects: a randomized, open-label, 2-sequence, 2-period, single-dose crossover study. Clin Ther. 2013;35:985–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karazniewicz-Lada M, Danielak D, Burchardt P, Kruszyna L, Komosa A, Lesiak M, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel and its metabolites in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2014;53:155–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elsinghorst PW. Quantitative determination of clopidogrel and its metabolites in biological samples: a mini-review. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2013;917–918:48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mullangi R, Srinivas NR. Clopidogrel: review of bioanalytical methods, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and update on recent trends in drug-drug interaction studies. Biomed Chromatogr. 2009;23:26–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bouman HJ, Schomig E, van Werkum JW, Velder J, Hackeng CM, Hirschhauser C, et al. Paraoxonase-l is a major determinant of clopidogrel efficacy. Nat Med. 2011;17:110–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jiang X-L, Samant S, Lesko LJ, Schmidt S. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54:147–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cattaneo M. Response variability to clopidogrel: is tailored treatment, based on laboratory testing, the right solution? J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10:327–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heestermans AACM, van Werkum JW, Taubert D, Seesing TH, von Beckerath N, Hackeng CM, et al. Impaired bioavailability of clopidogrel in patients with a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Thromb Res. 2008;122:776–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Levin ER, Gardner DG, Samson WK. Natriuretic peptides. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:321–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Silvain J, Cayla G, Hulot J-S, Finzi J, Kerneis M, O’Connor SA, et al. High on-thienopyridine platelet reactivity in elderly coronary patients: the SENIOR-PLATELET study. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1241–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hobl EL, Stimpfl T, Ebner J, Schoergenhofer C, Derhaschnig U, Sunder-Plassmann R, et al. Morphine decreases clopidogrel concentrations and effects: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:630–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Silvain J, Storey RF, Cayla G, Esteve J-B, Dillinger J-G, Rousseau H, et al. P2Y12 receptor inhibition and effect of morphine in patients undergoing primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The PRIVATE-ATLANTIC study. Thromb Haemost. 2016;116:369–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Montalescot G, van’t Hof AW, Lapostolle F, Silvain J, Lassen JF, Bolognese L, et al. Prehospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1016–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thomas MR, Morton AC, Hossain R, Chen B, Luo L, Shahari NNBM, et al. Morphine delays the onset of action of prasugrel in patients with prior history of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Thromb Haemost. 2016;116:96–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2017; ESC GUIDELINES 00, 1–66.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Collet J-P, Cuisset T, Range G, Cayla G, Elhadad S, Pouillot C, et al. Bedside monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy for coronary stenting. NEJM. 2012;22:2100–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gurbel PA, Erlinge D, Ohman EM, Neely B, Neely M, Goodman SG, et al. Platelet function during extended prasugrel and clopidogrel tharapy for patients with ACS treated without revascularization: the TRILOGY ACS platelet function substudy. JAMA. 2012;308:1785–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Price MJ, Miggau SS, Angiolillo DJ, Lillie E, Smith E, Tisch RL, et al. Influence of genetic polymorphisms on the effect of high- and standard-dose clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GIFT (genotype information and functional testing) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1928–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bouman HJ, Harmsze AM, van Werkum JW, Breet NJ, Bergmeijer TO, Ten Cate H, et al. Variability in on-treatment platelet reactivity explained by CYP2C19*2 genotype is modest in clopidogrel pretreated patients undergoing coronary stenting. Heart. 2011;97:1239–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Haberka M, Mizia-Stec K, Lasota B, Kyrcz-Krzemien S, Gąsior Z. Obesity and antiplatelet effects of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel in patients with stable angina pectoris after percutaneous coronary intervention. Pol Arch Med Wewnetrznej. 2015;125:620–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milan Pavlovic
    • 1
    • 2
  • Svetlana Apostolovic
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dragana Stokanovic
    • 3
  • Jelena Lilic
    • 4
  • Sandra S. Konstantinovic
    • 5
  • Jelena B. Zvezdanovic
    • 5
  • Valentina Marinkovic
    • 6
  • Valentina N. Nikolic
    • 3
    • 7
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicine—Cardiology, Medical FacultyUniversity of NisNisSerbia
  2. 2.Clinic for Cardiovascular DiseasesClinical Centre NisNisSerbia
  3. 3.Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical FacultyUniversity of NisNisSerbia
  4. 4.Medical FacultyUniversity of NisNisSerbia
  5. 5.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of TechnologyUniversity of NisLeskovacSerbia
  6. 6.Department of Social Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Legislation, Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of BelegradeBelgradeSerbia
  7. 7.Medicinski fakultetNisSerbia

Personalised recommendations