Evaluation of the impact of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation intervention: a single centre pre–post study from Ethiopia
- 153 Downloads
Background The role of pharmacists in medication reconciliation (MedRec) is highly acknowledged in many developed nations. However, the impact of this strategy has not been well researched in low-and-middle-income countries, including Ethiopia. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of pharmacist-led MedRec intervention on the incidence of unintentional medication discrepancies in Ethiopia. Setting Emergency department in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Ethiopia. Method A single centre, prospective, pre-post study was conducted on adults (aged 18 years or over) that had been hospitalized for at least 24 h and were taking at least 2 home medications on admission. The intervention involved assignment of a pharmacist to an emergency care team so as to take the best possible medication history and reconcile this list with the current medications in use. Main outcome measure Incidence and potential clinical severity of unintentional medication discrepancies. Results 123 patients were included (pre-intervention, 49; post-intervention, 74). The proportion of patients with at least one unintended discrepancy was reduced from 59 to 10.5% after the intervention (p < 0.001). Similarly, the percentage of patients with potentially severe clinical impact medication discrepancies reduced significantly after the intervention (p < 0.01). Most importantly, the likelihood of occurrence of unintentional medication discrepancies was approximately 17 times more often in the absence of pharmacist intervention (OR 16.45, 95% CI 5.22, 51.85). Conclusion This study has found that pharmacist-led MedRec intervention was impactful, and it was able to minimize the incidence of unintentional medication discrepancies significantly.
KeywordsEthiopia Medication reconciliation Medication safety Medication errors Pharmacists
The authors would like to thank the pharmacists Abaynesh Fentahun, Melka Abdisa, Tamerat Befekadu for their help for the collection and categorization of data, all staffs at the emergency ward and the pharmacist (Feser Dula) who was member of the emergency ward team. The contribution of Misganaw Semagn, focal personnel for drug information service, is highly acknowledged. The technical support from the clinical director of Gondar University Hospital, and other departments (Internal medicine and Hospital pharmacy) are gratefully acknowledged. Alemayehu B Mekonnen gratefully acknowledge funding to support his Ph.D. training provided by The University of Sydney International Students’ Scholarship.
This study was partly funded by the University of Sydney through the Postgraduate Research Support Scheme (PRSS).
Conflicts of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 2.Gleason KM, McDaniel MR, Feinglass J, Baker DW, Lindquist L, Liss D, et al. Results of the Medications at Transitions and Clinical Handoffs (MATCH) study: an analysis of medication reconciliation errors and risk factors at hospital admission. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(5):441–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Karapinar-Carkit F, Borgsteede SD, Zoer J, Smit HJ, Egberts AC, van den Bemt PM. Effect of medication reconciliation with and without patient counseling on the number of pharmaceutical interventions among patients discharged from the hospital. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43(6):1001–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Joint Commission on Accreditation for Healthcare Organizations. National Patient Safety Goals. 2006. https://www.jointcommission.org/improving_americas_hospitals_the_joint_commissions_annual_report_on_quality_and_safety_-_2006/. Accessed 30 Jan 2018.
- 15.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Medicines optimisation: the safe and effective use of medicines to enable the best possible outcomes. NICE guideline, March 2015. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng5. Accessed 30 Jan 2018.
- 16.Accreditation Canada. Required organizational practices handbook, Ottawa. 2017. http://www.gov.pe.ca/photos/original/src_rophandbook.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2018.
- 17.Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. MedRec. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/medication-safety/medicationreconciliation/. Accessed 30 Jan 2018.
- 23.Pharmaceuticals Fund and Supply Agency (PFSA) and Systems for Improved Access to Pharmaceuticals and Services (SIAPS). National Assessment on the Implementation Status of Clinical Pharmacy Service at Public Hospitals in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: PFSA and SIAPS; 2016. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s22467en/s22467en.pdf. Accessed 5 March 2017.
- 26.Institute for Health care Improvement. Medication reconciliation review. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/MedicationReconciliationReview.aspx. Accessed 30 Jan 2018.
- 27.World Health Organization. Patient safety: high 5 s—standard operating procedures. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/topics/high-5s/en/. Accessed 03 Feb 2018.
- 29.van den Bemt PM, van der Schrieck-de Loos EM, van der Linden C, Theeuwes AM, Pol AG, Dutch CBO, WHO High 5 s Study Group. Effect of medication reconciliation on unintentional medication discrepancies in acute hospital admissions of elderly adults: a multicentre study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(8):1262–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.World Health Organization. The high 5 s project: interim report; 2013. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/implementation/solutions/high5s/High5_InterimReport.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2018.