Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 450–457 | Cite as

Exploring the current and future role of the pharmacists in osteoporosis screening and management in Malaysia

  • L. S. TohEmail author
  • P. S. M. Lai
  • S. Othman
  • A. Shah
  • C. P. L. Dang
  • B. Y. Low
  • K. T. Wong
  • C. Anderson
Research Article

Abstract

Background Several studies have found that pharmacists can assist in screening and prevention of osteoporosis by referring patients for bone mineral density scans and counselling on lifestyle changes. In Malaysia, screening osteoporosis in all elderly women is not mandatory due to its cost. One approach to address this gap is to develop a pharmacist-led osteoporosis screening and prevention program. However, there is a paucity of data on the perspectives of Malaysian pharmacists in this area. Objective To explore the perspective of stakeholders (policy makers, doctors, pharmacists, nurses and patients) towards the role of pharmacists in osteoporosis screening and management. Setting A primary care clinic located within a teaching hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Method Patients (n = 20), nurses (n = 10), pharmacists (n = 11), doctors (n = 10) and policy makers (n = 5) were individually interviewed using a semi-structured topic guide. Purposive sampling was used. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Main outcome measure Perspective of stakeholders on the current and future role of pharmacists. Results All participants perceived pharmacists to be suppliers of medication, although there was some recognition of roles in providing medication advice. Nonetheless, these stakeholders were eager for pharmacists to expand their non-dispensing roles towards counselling, creating awareness and screening of osteoporosis. Interviewed pharmacists referred to their current role as ‘robotic dispensers’ and unanimously agreed to spread out to osteoporosis management role. Conclusion Under stakeholders there is a willingness to expand the role of pharmacists in Malaysia to non-dispensing roles, particularly in osteoporosis screening and management.

Keywords

Malaysia Osteoporosis Pharmacist role Postmenopausal Qualitative Screening 

Notes

Funding

Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) fund (06-02-12-SF0183).

Conflicts of interest

All the Authors declares that they have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Kanis JA. WHO scientific group technical report: assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level. UK. WHO. 2007;1–339. https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/FRAX/pdfs/WHO_Technical_Report.pdf. Accessed 08 Aug 2017.
  2. 2.
    Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ. Hip fracture in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int. 1992;2:285–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schneider JK, Nickman NA. Assessment of pharmaceutical care needs in an ambulatory setting. Hosp Pharm. 1994;29:238–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Boven JFM, Stuurman Bieze AGG, Hiddink EG, Postma MJ, Vegter S. Medication monitoring and optimization: a targeted pharmacist program for effective and cost-effective improvement of chronic therapy adherence. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014;20(8):786–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stuurman-Bieze AGG, Hiddink EG, van Boven JFM, Vegter S. Proactive pharmaceutical care interventions decrease patients’ nonadherence to osteoporosis medication. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25:1807–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    George PP, Molina JAD, Cheah J, Chan SC, Lim BP. The evolving role of the community pharmacist in chronic disease management—a literature review. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2010;39:861–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lai PSM, Chua SS, Chan SP. Impact of pharmaceutical care on knowledge, quality of life and satisfaction of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Int J Clin Pharm. 2013;35(4):629–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Toh LS, Lai PS, Othman S, Wong KT, Low BY, Anderson C. An analysis of inter-professional collaboration in osteoporosis screening at a primary care level using the D’Amour model. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.10.004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yuksel N, Majumdar SR, Biggs C, Tsuyuki RT. Community pharmacist-initiated screening program for osteoporosis: randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(3):391–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crockett JA, Taylor SJ, McLeod LJ. Patient responses to an integrated service, initiated by community pharmacists, for the prevention of osteoporosis. Int J Pharm Pract. 2008;16(2):65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McDonough RP, Doucette WR, Kumbera P, Klepser DG. An evaluation of managing and educating patients on the risk of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Value Health. 2005;8(1):24–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elias MN, Burden AM, Cadarette SM. The impact of pharmacist interventions on osteoporosis management: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(10):2587–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2008;3(2):77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ziebland S, McPherson A. Making sense of qualitatative data analysis: an introduction with illustrations from DIPEx (personal experiences of health and illness). Med Educ. 2006;40:405–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bazeley P. Analysing qualitative data: more than ‘identifying themes’. Malays J Qual Res. 2009;2:6–22.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bowen GA. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qual Res. 2008;8(1):137–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen HY, Boore JRP. Translation and back-translation in qualitative nursing research: methodological review. J Clin Nurs. 2009;19:234–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pharmacy Guild Australia. Medication management review program. 2010. http://www.guild.org.au/mmr/content.asp?id=406. Accessed 08 Aug 2017.
  20. 20.
    Australia Department of Health and Ageing WA. Primary healthcare reform in Australia: report to support Australia’s first national primary healthcare strategy. Western Australia: Department of Health and Ageing; 2009.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Farrell B, Pottie K, Woodend K, Yao V, Dolovich L, Kennie N, et al. Shifts in expectations: evaluating physicians’ perceptions as pharmacists become integrated into family practice. J Interprof Care. 2010;24(1):80–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blondal AB, Jonsson JS, Sporrong SK, Almarsdottir AB. General practitioners’ perceptions of the current status and pharmacists’ contribution to primary care in Iceland. Int J Clin Pharm. 2017;39(4):945–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tan EC, George J, Stewart K, Elliott RA. Improving osteoporosis management in general practice: a pharmacist-led drug use evaluation program. Drugs Aging. 2014;31(9):703–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tan EC, Stewart K, Elliott RA, George J. Pharmacist services provided in general practice clinics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2014;10(4):608–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Iversen L, Mollison J, MacLeod TN. Attitudes of the general public to the expanding role of community pharmacists: a pilot study. Fam Pract. 2001;18(5):534–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee EL, Wong PS, Tan MY, Sheridan J. What role could community pharmacists in Malaysia play in diabetes self-management education and support? The views of individuals with type 2 diabetes. Int J Pharm Pract. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12374.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nik J, Lai PS, Ng CJ, Emmerton L. A qualitative study of community pharmacists’ opinions on the provision of osteoporosis disease state management services in Malaysia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:448.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jorgenson D, Lamb D, MacKinnon NJ. Practice change challenges and priorities: a national survey of practising pharmacists. Can Pharm J. 2011;144:125–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Pharmacy, School of MedicineUniversity of TasmaniaTasmaniaAustralia
  2. 2.School of PharmacyUniversity of NottinghamSemenyihMalaysia
  3. 3.University of Malaya Primary Care Research Group (UMPCRG), Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  4. 4.Division of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of PharmacyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations