Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 594–600 | Cite as

Knowledge and opinion of pharmacists on emergency contraceptive pills in Hungary

  • Melinda VanyaEmail author
  • Maria Matuz
  • Ria Benko
  • Reka Viola
  • Attila Horvath-Sziklai
  • Gyongyvér Soos
  • Gyorgy Bartfai
Research Article
  • 224 Downloads

Abstract

Background Emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) are used to prevent unintended pregnancy. There is a worldwide intention to improve access to ECPs; therefore, identifying potential barriers to introducing over-the counter (OTC) access is of utmost importance. As pharmacists are the key personnel to convey accurate drug information, their knowledge and attitude on ECPs is important. Objective We aimed to conduct a nationwide study to assess pharmacists’ knowledge on ECPs and to survey their opinion on sales category change of ECPs (i.e. to introduce OTC access in pharmacies). Setting Registered pharmacists in Hungary. Method A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with an anonymous, web-based questionnaire. Univariate analysis (Mann–Whitney U test and Fischer’s exact test) was used to identify factors associated with supportive opinion toward OTC provision. Main outcome measure Knowledge level of pharmacists, proportion of pharmacists with supportive opinion on OTC access. Results 357 out of 2019 pharmacists completed the questionnaire, yielding a 17.7% response rate. Almost 30% of pharmacists (N = 99) agreed that ECPs should have an OTC availability in Hungary. More than 40% of pharmacists (N = 145) considered ECPs as contraceptives. On average, 55.18% (standard deviation: ±12.40%) of the answers were correct, showing moderate knowledge of the pharmacists. Age and rating ECPs as contraceptives were significantly associated with supportive opinion toward OTC provision (p < 0.001). The effect of knowledge on the pharmacist’s opinion was significant in young pharmacists (p = 0.02). Conclusion Pharmacists’ knowledge and opinion on ECPs should be improved, especially that of the young ones. Currently the attitude of pharmacists does not favor sales category changes of ECPs in Hungary.

Keywords

Emergency contraceptives Knowledge Hungary Opinion OTC Pharmacists Questionnaire 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We thank all pharmacists who participated in the survey. We also thank L. Toth MD consultant at Leeds University for valuable discussions on the English of our paper. Thanks are due to Cs. Keresztes for editing and proofreading the paper.

Funding

This study has not received any funding.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Gemzell-Danielsson K, Berger C, Lalitkumar PG. Mechanisms of action of oral emergency contraception. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30:685–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    WHO. ATC/DDD Index [Internet]. WHO collaborating centre for drug statistics methodology. http://www.whocc.no/. Accessed 20 Dec 2016.
  3. 3.
    Cleland K, Raymond EG, Westley E, Trussell J. Emergency contraception review: evidence-based recommendations for clinicians. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57:741–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    International consortium on emergency contraception. International consortium on emergency contraception. http://www.cecinfo.org/Accessed 15 Dec 2016.
  5. 5.
    European Commission E medicines A. Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 January 2015 to 31 January 2015 (Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2015.071.01.0002.01.ENG&toc=OJ:C:2015:071:TOC Accessed 20 Dec 2016.
  6. 6.
    Hussainy SY, Stewart K, Chapman CB, Taft AJ, Amir LH, Hobbs MK, et al. Provision of the emergency contraceptive pill without prescription: attitudes and practices of pharmacists in Australia. Contraception. 2011;83:159–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Richman AR, Daley EM, Baldwin J, Kromrey J, O’Rourke K, Perrin K. The role of pharmacists and emergency contraception: are pharmacists’ perceptions of emergency contraception predictive of their dispensing practices? Contraception. 2012;86:370–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hellerstedt WL, Van Riper KK. Emergency contraceptive pills: dispensing practices, knowledge and attitudes of South Dakota pharmacists. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2005;37:19–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Szucs M, Szollosi AP, Bartfai G. Knowledge and attitudes of pharmacists regarding over-the-counter emergency contraception in South-Eastern Hungary. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2010;15:336–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agresti A, Caffo B. Simple and effective confidence intervals for proportions and differences of proportions result from adding two successes and two failures. Am Stat. 2000;54:280–8.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. Oxford University Press; 2008. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231881.001.0001/acprof-9780199231881. Accessed 20 Dec 2016.
  12. 12.
    Swedish As- sociation of the pharmaceutical industry. (FASS) Swedish catalogue of approved drug. http://www.fass.se/LIF/product?nplId=20120418000059&userType=0. Accessed 20 Dec 2016.
  13. 13.
    Australian Government, Department of Health ADEC. Prescribing medicines in pregnancy database. http://www.tga.gov.au/prescribing-medicines-pregnancy-database#searchname. Accessed 20 Dec 2016.
  14. 14.
    Ball DE, Marafie N, Abahussain E. Awareness and perceptions of emergency contraception among retail pharmacists in Kuwait. Pharm World Sci. 2006;28:101–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whelan AM, Langille DB, Hurst E. Nova Scotia pharmacists’ knowledge of, experiences with and perception of factors interfering with their ability to provide emergency contraceptive pill consultations. Int J Pharm Pract. 2013;21:314–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Queddeng K, Chaar B, Williams K. Emergency contraception in Australian community pharmacies: a simulated patient study. Contraception. 2011;83(2):176–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mishra A, Saxena P. Over-the-counter sale of emergency contraception: a survey of pharmacists in Delhi. Sex Med. 2013;1:16–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bennett W, Petraitis C, D’Anella A, Marcella S. Pharmacists’ knowledge and the difficulty of obtaining emergency contraception. Contraception. 2003;68:261–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Higgins SJ, Hattingh HL. Requests for emergency contraception in community pharmacy: an evaluation of services provided to mystery patients. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2013;9:114–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Emergency Contraceptive Pills (ECPs) Training for Pharmacists | fptraining.org. https://www.fptraining.org/projects/emergency-contraceptive-pills-ecps-training-pharmacists. Accessed 5 Jan 2017.
  21. 21.
    Aneblom G, Lundborg CS, Carlsten A, Eurenius K, Tyden T. Emergency contraceptive pills over-the-counter: practices and attitudes of pharmacy and nurse-midwife providers. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;55:129–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dunn S, Brown TER, Alldred J. Availability of emergency contraception after its deregulation from prescription-only status: a survey of Ontario pharmacies. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J Assoc Medicale Can. 2008;178:423–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moreau C, Bajos N, Trussell J. The impact of pharmacy access to emergency contraceptive pills in France. Contraception. 2006;73:602–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krassovics MVG. Usage patterns and attitudes towards emergency contraception: the international emergency contraception research initiative. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(4):310–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL. A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas. 2000;60:821–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fan W, Yan Z. Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: a systematic review. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26:132–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wagner Y, Heinrich-Weltzien R. Midwives’ oral health recommendations for pregnant women, infants and young children: results of a nationwide survey in Germany. BMC Oral Health. 2016; doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0192-1. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/16/36.
  28. 28.
    Fittler, A B T, Szűcs, H C ÁI, Priksz, D B A, Benkő, B F ÁA, Marosi, A. Gradual pharmacy education: opinion of pharmacists. National representative survey of the Hungarian Pharmaceutical Society, Youth Committee [Graduális gyógyszerészképzés: Mi a gyógyszerészek véleménye?—a Magyar Gyógyszerésztudományi Társaság Ifjusági Bizottsága országos reprezentatív kérdőíves felmérésének eredményei.] Hungarian. Gyógyszerészet. 58:420–37.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Patel M, Slack M, Cooley J, Bhattacharjee S. A cross-sectional survey of pharmacists to understand their personal preference of brand and generic over-the-counter medications used to treat common health conditions. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2016;9:17. doi: 10.1186/s40545-016-0066-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Albert Szent-Gyorgyi Health Centre, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary
  3. 3.Hungarian Chamber of PharmacistsBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations