International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 709–713 | Cite as

Terminology, the importance of defining

  • J. W. Foppe van MilEmail author
  • Martin Henman


Multiple terms and definitions exist to describe specific aspects of pharmacy practice and service provision. This commentary explores the reasons for different interpretations of words and concepts in pharmaceutical care and pharmacy practice research. Reasons for this variation can be found in language, culture, profession and may also depend on developments over time. A list of words is provided where the authors think that currently multiple interpretations are possible. To make sure that the reader understands the essence, it seems imperative that authors include a definition of the topics that they actually study in their papers, and that they clearly cite existing definitions or refer to collections of definitions such as existing glossaries. It is important that presenters, authors and reviewers of pharmacy practice papers pay more attention to this aspect of describing studies.


Pharmacy practice Research Terminology Translation 




Conflicts of interest



  1. 1.
    Moullin JC, Sabater-Hernàndez D, Fernandez-Llimos F, Benrimoj SI. Defining professional pharmacy services in community pharmacy. Res Soc Admin Pharm. 2013;9(6):989–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    WHO. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June 1946, and entered into force on 7 April 1948.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Üstün B, Jakob R. Calling a spade a spade: meaningful definitions of health conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:802.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Awofeso N. Re-defining health. Last Accessed 26 Dec 2015.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    van Mil JWF, McElnay JC, de Jong-van den Berg LTW, Tromp TFJ. The challenges of defining pharmaceutical care on an international level. Int J Pharm Pract. 1999;7:202–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Farris KB, Kirking DM. Assessing the quality of pharmaceutical care. II. Application of concepts of quality assessment from medical care. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27(2):215–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bungay KM, Wagner AK. Assessing the quality of pharmaceutical care [letter; comment]. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27(12):1542–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pharmaceutisch Weekblad-Nieuws. UMCG participeert in apotheek aan A15 [UMCG participates in pharmacy aling the A15]. 20-2-2015 Last Accesses 26 Dec 2015.
  10. 10.
    Martins SA, van Mil JWF, F Alves da Costa. The organizational framework of community pharmacies in Europe. Int J Clin Pharm. 2015;37(5):896–905.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hughes CM, et al. Provision of pharmaceutical care by community pharmacists: a comparison across Europe. Pharm World Sci. 2010;32:472–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tan EC, Stewart K, Elliot RA. J George Pharmacist services provided in general practice clinics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2014;10:608–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Mil JWF. Pharmaceutical care, the future of pharmacy [Dissertation]. Groningen, Groningen University, 1999. Chapter 8: the chances for pharmaceutical care. p. 152–153.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    European Union of Medical Specialities. Last Accessed 16 Mar 2016.
  15. 15.
    Rotta I, Salgado TM, Felix DC, Souza TT, Correr CJ, Fernandez-Llimos F. Ensuring consistent reporting of clinical pharmacy services to enhance reproducibility in practice: an improved version of DEPICT. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21:584–90. doi: 10.1111/jep.12339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mikael RL, Brown TR, Lazarus HL, Vinson MC. Quality of pharmaceutical care in hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1975;32:567–74.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Allemann SS, van Mil JW, Botermann L, Berger K, Griese N, Hersberger KE. Pharmaceutical care: the PCNE definition 2013. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;6(3):544–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vrijens B, De Geest S, Hughes DA, Przemyslaw K, Demonceau J, Ruppar T, et al. A new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;73(5):691–705.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Buetow SA, Sibbald B, Cantrill JA, Halliwell S. Appropriateness in health care: application to prescribing. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45(2):261–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Mil JW, Franklin BD. Defining clinical pharmacy and pharmaceutical care. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27(3):137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    ACCP. The definition of clinical pharmacy. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28(6):816–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    NHS Choices. Counselling. Last Accessed 14 Jan 2016.
  23. 23.
    Basger BJ, Moles RJ, Chen TF. Application of drug-related problem (DRP) classification systems: a review of the literature. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;70(7):799–815.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bulajeva A, Labberton L, Leikola S, Pohjanoksa-Mantilla M, Geurts MME, de Gier JJ, et al. Medication review practices in European countries. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014;10(5):731–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Mil JW, Fernandez-Llimos F. What is ‘pharmaceutical care’ in 2013? Int J Clin Pharm. 2013;35(1):1–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pintor-Mármol A, Baena MI, Fajardo PC, Sabater-Hernández D, Sáez-Benito L, García-Cárdenas MV, et al. Terms used in patient safety related to medication: a literature review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(8):799–809.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    International Pharmaceutical Federation. FIP and patient safety glossary of terms. Last Accessed 14 Jan 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Van Mil ConsultancyZuidlarenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Health SciencesTrinity College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations