Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 635–640 | Cite as

Applications of mixed-methods methodology in clinical pharmacy research

  • Muhammad Abdul HadiEmail author
  • S. José Closs
Commentary
  • 843 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction Mixed-methods methodology, as the name suggests refers to mixing of elements of both qualitative and quantitative methodologies in a single study. In the past decade, mixed-methods methodology has gained popularity among healthcare researchers as it promises to bring together the strengths of both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Methodology A number of mixed-methods designs are available in the literature and the four most commonly used designs in healthcare research are: the convergent parallel design, the embedded design, the exploratory design, and the explanatory design. Each has its own unique advantages, challenges and procedures and selection of a particular design should be guided by the research question. Guidance on designing, conducting and reporting mixed-methods research is available in the literature, so it is advisable to adhere to this to ensure methodological rigour. When to use it is best suited when the research questions require: triangulating findings from different methodologies to explain a single phenomenon; clarifying the results of one method using another method; informing the design of one method based on the findings of another method, development of a scale/questionnaire and answering different research questions within a single study. Two case studies have been presented to illustrate possible applications of mixed-methods methodology. Limitations Possessing the necessary knowledge and skills to undertake qualitative and quantitative data collection, analysis, interpretation and integration remains the biggest challenge for researchers conducting mixed-methods studies. Sequential study designs are often time consuming, being in two (or more) phases whereas concurrent study designs may require more than one data collector to collect both qualitative and quantitative data at the same time.

Keywords

Mixed-methods Multi-methods Pharmacy Qualitative methods Quantitative methods 

Notes

Funding

No funding from any governmental or non-governmental agency was obtained for this paper.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

References

  1. 1.
    Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311:42–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Integration and publications as indicators of ‘yield’ from mixed methods studies. J Mix Methods Res. 2007;1:147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Creswell WJ, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conduction mixed methods research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2011.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson RB, Onwuebuzie AJ. Mixed-methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res. 2004;33:14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tashakkori A, Creswell JW. Editorial: the new era of mixed methods. J Mix Methods Res. 2007;1:3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mix Methods Res. 2007;1:112–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poses RM, Isen AM. Quantitative research in medicine and healthcare: questions and controversy. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:32–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hadi MA, Alldred DP, Briggs M, Closs SJ. Mixed methods research in pharmacy practice: basics and beyond (Part 1). Int J of Pharm Pract. 2013;21:341–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hadi MA, Alldred DP, Briggs M, Closs SJ. Mixed-methods research in pharmacy practice: recommendations for quality reporting (Part 2). Int J Pharm Pract. 2014;22:96–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Teddlie C, Tashakkaori A. A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Res Sch. 2006;13:12–8.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morse JM, Niehaus L. Mixed methods design: principles and procedures. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 1989;11:255–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leech NL, Onwuegbuzie AJ. A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual Quant. 2007;43:265–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tiddlie C, Tashakkaori A. Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand OAKS: Sage Publications; 2009.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morse JM. Approaches to qualitative quantitative methodological triangulation. Nurs Res. 1991;40:120–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13:92–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schifferdecker KD, Reed VA. Using mixed methods research in medical education: basic guidelines for researchers. Med Educ. 2009;43:637–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leech NL, Onwuebuzie AJ. Guidelines for conducting and reporting mixed research in the field of counseling and beyond. J Couns Dev. 2010;88:61–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Curry LA, Krumholz HM, O’Cathain A, Plano-Clark VL, Cherlin E, Bradley EH. Mixed methods in biomedical and health services research. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6:119–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ. 2010;341:c4587.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Irwin A, Weidmann AE. A mixed methods investigation into the use of non-technical skills by community and hospital pharmacists. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2014;. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.11.006.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Witry MJ, Wesely PM, Goedken AM, Ernst EJ, Sorofman BA, Doucette WR. Development of a medication attitude monitoring measure using a mixed methods item development process. Int J Pharm Pract. 2015;. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hadi MA, Alldred DP, Briggs M, Closs SJ, Marczewski K. Mixed methods evaluation of nurse-pharmacist managed pain clinic: design, rationale and limitations. Can Pharm J. 2013;46:1–5.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hadi MA, Alldred DP, Briggs M, Marczewski K, Closs SJ. Effectiveness of a community based nurse-pharmacist managed pain clinic: a mixed-methods study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.09.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kaufmann CP, Stämpfli D, Hersberger KE, Lampert ML. Determination of risk factors for drug-related problems: a multidisciplinary triangulation process. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e006376. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006376.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pollini RA, Lozada R, Gallardo M, et al. Barriers to pharmacy-based syringe purchase among injection drug users in Tijuana, Mexico: a mixed methods study. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(3):679–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. 2008. www.mrc.ac.uk/complexinterventionsguidance. Accessed May 6, 2015).
  29. 29.
    Parker CP, Cunningham CL, Carter BL, Vander Weg MW, Richardson KK, Rosenthal GE. A mixed method approach to evaluate a pharmacist intervention for veterans with hypertension. J Clin Hypertens. 2014;16:133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harris AD, Bradham DD, Baumgarten M, Zuckerman IH, Fink JC, Perencevich EN. The use and interpretation of Quasi-experimental studies in infectious diseases. Clinic Infect Dis. 2004;38:1586–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij ter bevordering der Pharmacie 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of PharmacyUmm-Al-Qura UniversityMeccaSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.School of HealthcareUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations