Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 16–19 | Cite as

Health care professionals’ and students’ attitude toward collaboration between pharmacists and physicians in Croatia

  • Ana Seselja-Perisin
  • Arijana Mestrovic
  • Ivana Klinar
  • Darko ModunEmail author
Short Research Report

Abstract

Background As traditional roles of pharmacists and physicians seem nowadays insufficient to ensure patient safety and therapy effectiveness, interprofessional collaboration has been suggested to improve health outcomes. Objective To assess and compare the attitudes of physicians and pharmacists, as well as medical and pharmacy students in Croatia, toward interprofessional collaboration in primary health care. Methods The study included 513 pharmacists and physicians, and 365 students of pharmacy and medicine from Croatia. The validated questionnaire, Scale of Attitudes Toward Physician–Pharmacist Collaboration, was translated in Croatian and completed, anonymously and voluntarily, by all participants. Results Pharmacists showed a more positive attitude toward collaboration than physicians (53.8 ± 4.8 vs. 50.7 ± 5.0). Pharmacy students expressed the most positive attitude (56.2 ± 4.9), while medical students showed the remarkably lowest attitude toward collaboration (44.6 ± 6.2). Conclusion Pharmacists and physicians in Croatia expressed a relatively positive attitude toward their collaboration, comparable with their colleges in the USA. On the other hand, medical students expressed a 21 % less positive attitude than pharmacy students which could have an effect on interprofessional collaboration in the future when those students start working as health care professionals. Future studies, focusing on the promotion of this collaboration, on both under-graduated and post-graduated level, are warranted.

Keywords

Attitudes Croatia Interprofessional collaboration Medical students Pharmacist Pharmacy students Physician 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors thank Professor Livia Puljak for her contribution to the back—translation of the questionnaire.

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Joint FIP/WHO guidelines on good pharmacy practice: standards for quality of pharmacy services. World Health Organization. Technical report series no. 961; 2011, p. 310–23Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: World Health Organization, Department of Human Resources for Health; 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hunt JS, Siemienczuk J, Pape G, Rozenfeld Y, MacKay J, LeBlanc BH, et al. A randomized controlled trial of team-based care: impact of physician–pharmacist collaboration on uncontrolled hypertension. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(12):1966–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amariles P, Sabater-Hernandez D, Garcia-Jimenez E, Rodriguez-Chamorro MA, Prats-Mas R, Marin-Magan F, et al. Effectiveness of Dader method for pharmaceutical care on control of blood pressure and total cholesterol in outpatients with cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk: EMDADER-CV randomized controlled trial. J Manage Care Pharm. 2012;18(4):311–23.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wustmann AF, Haase-Strey C, Kubiak T, Ritter CA. Cooperation between community pharmacists and general practitioners in eastern Germany: attitudes and needs. Int J Clin Pharm. 2013;35(4):584–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Winkle LJ, Fjortoft N, Hojat M. Validation of an instrument to measure pharmacy and medical students’ attitudes toward physician–pharmacist collaboration. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(9):178.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hojat M, Spandorfer J, Isenberg GA, Vergare MJ, Fassihi R, Gonnella JS. Psychometrics of the scale of attitudes toward physician–pharmacist collaboration: a study with medical students. Med Teach. 2012;34(12):E833–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hojat M, Gonnella JS. An instrument for measuring pharmacist and physician attitudes towards collaboration: preliminary psychometric data. J Interprof Care. 2011;25(1):66–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chisholm-Burns MA, Kim Lee J, Spivey CA, Slack M, Herrier RN, Hall-Lipsy E, et al. US pharmacists’ effect as team members on patient care: systematic review and meta-analyses. Med Care. 2010;48(10):923–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Winkle LJ, Bjork BC, Chandar N, Cornell S, Fjortoft N, Green JM, et al. Interprofessional workshop to improve mutual understanding between pharmacy and medical students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(8):150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij ter bevordering der Pharmacie 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Seselja-Perisin
    • 1
  • Arijana Mestrovic
    • 1
  • Ivana Klinar
    • 2
  • Darko Modun
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of PharmacyUniversity of Split School of MedicineSplitCroatia
  2. 2.Pliva Hrvatska d.o.o.ZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations