An exploration of health professionals’ experiences of medicines management in elderly, hospitalised patients in Abu Dhabi
- 378 Downloads
Background Given the multiplicity of issues relating to medicines in the elderly, the structures and processes of medicines management should be clearly defined and described to optimise patient outcomes. There is a paucity of research which provides an in-depth exploration of these elements of medicines management for elderly patients. Objectives This study explored health professionals’ experiences of medicines management for elderly, hospitalised patients in Abu Dhabi. Setting The research was conducted in five major hospitals in Abu Dhabi, the United Arab Emirates. Method Responses to an online sampling questionnaire were used to purposively select nurses, pharmacists and physicians for interview. A semi-structured interview schedule was developed with reference to normalization process theory (NPT) and the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to explore issues of medicines management structures, processes and outcomes. Face-to-face interviews of 20–30 min were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework Approach. Main outcome measures Health professionals’ in-depth experiences of structures, processes and outcomes relating to medicines management. Results Saturation of themes was deemed to occur at interview 27 (7 nurses, 13 pharmacists, 7 physicians). Six key themes and several subthemes emerged from the qualitative analysis, which pertained to the need for: appropriate polypharmacy; a systematic approach to medicines history taking; improved communication and documentation; improved patients’ adherence to medicines; guidelines and policies to support medicines selection, and an educated and trained multidisciplinary team. The most dominant TDF behavioural determinants were issues around: professional role and identity; beliefs about capabilities; beliefs about consequences; environmental context and resources; knowledge, and goals. NPT construct identified little evidence of coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring. Conclusion The key themes identified in this research indicate the need to develop a more structured approach to medicines management in elderly hospitalised patients in Abu Dhabi. The NPT constructs and the TDF behavioural determinants can be utilised as part of service development and implementing change.
KeywordsAbu Dhabi Interviews Normalization process theory Qualitative Theoretical domains framework
We acknowledge the participation of all interviewees.
Funding was provided by Embassy of the United Arab Emirates.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
- 1.World Health Organization. The world health report 2008. Primary health care—now more than ever. New York: The World Health Report; 2008. ISBN: 978 92 4 156373 4.Google Scholar
- 5.Patterson SM, Hughes C, Kerse N, Cardwell CR, Bradley MC. Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people. Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2012;5(5):CD008165.Google Scholar
- 13.O’Mahony D, O’Sullivan D, Byrne S, O’Connor MN, Ryan C, Gallagher P. STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. Age Ageing. 2014;0:1–6.Google Scholar
- 15.Kardas P, Lewek P, Matyjaszczyk M. Determinants of patient adherence: a review of systematic reviews. Front Pharmac. 2013;4:91. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00091
- 16.Audit Commission (United Kingdom). A spoonful of sugar Medicines management in NHS hospitals. London: Audit Commission; 2001. ISBN: 1 86240 321 X.Google Scholar
- 17.National Prescribing Centre. Modernising medicines management—a guide to achieving benefits for patients, professionals and the NHS. Liverpool: National Prescribing Centre; 2002. http://www.nice.org.uk/about/nice-communities/medicines-and-prescribing [cited May 2015].
- 18.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Medicines optimisation: scope consultation. Available from http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/gid-cgwave0676/documents/medicines-optimisation-scope-consultation [cited May 2015].
- 19.Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring: the definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. MI: Health Administration Press; 1980.Google Scholar
- 20.SEHA Annual Report 2012. The changing face of healthcare. Abu Dhabi: Abu Dhabi Health Services Co. http://www.seha.ae/SEHA/Annual%20Report/AR%202012/chairmans_statement.html# [cited May 2015].
- 25.Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Huberman M, Miles MB, editors. The qualitative researcher’s companion. UK: Sage Publications; 2002. p. 305–329.Google Scholar
- 29.Guthrie B, Payne K, Alderson P, McMurdo ME, Mercer SW. Adapting clinical guidelines to take account of multimorbidity. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2012;345:e6341.Google Scholar