Outcomes of ceftriaxone use compared to standard of therapy in methicillin susceptible staphylococcal aureus (MSSA) bloodstream infections
- 2.2k Downloads
Background Standard of care therapy (SOCT) for the treatment of methicillin susceptible staphylococcal aureus (MSSA) infections requires multiple daily infusions. Despite questionable efficacy due to high protein binding, ceftriaxone (CTX) is frequently used for treatment of MSSA at Hines VA Hospital. Objective The objective of this study was to determine clinical and microbiological outcomes in patients with MSSA bacteremia treated with CTX compared to SOCT. Setting This retrospective study was conducted at the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital which is a comprehensive health care center serving the veteran population of the greater metropolitan Chicago and northwest Indiana regions and is institutionally affiliated with the Loyola University Medical Center. The Hines VA provides medical care to over 56,000 veterans and operates approximately 500 hospital beds, including acute care and nursing home beds. Method We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with MSSA bacteremia treated at Hines VA Hospital between January 2000 and September 2009. Patients who received either SOCT or CTX for >50 % of the treatment course and for the appropriate duration were included. Patients who were on multiple antibiotics concurrently or who received <14 days of therapy were excluded. Main outcome measure The primary outcome of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of patients with MSSA bacteremia who were treated with CTX compared to those who received standard of care agents. Results Ninety-three patients with MSSA bacteremia were included in the analysis. Fifty-one were treated with SOCT and 42 with CTX. There were no differences in microbiological cure between SOCT (94.1 %) and CTX (95.2 %) (p = 0.812). Clinical cure was similar between groups (74.5 % for SOCT, 83.3 % for CTX) (p = 0.303). CTX was used more often to treat Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia associated with osteomyelitis whereas endocarditis and central line associated infections were treated more frequently with SOCT (p = 0.01). More patients treated with CTX were managed in the ambulatory setting (64 vs. 24 %; p = <0.001). There was a trend toward a longer hospital stay with SOCT. Conclusion Clinical outcomes for MSSA bacteremia did not differ significantly between patients treated with CTX and SOCT. Findings suggest that CTX may be an alternative for outpatient management of MSSA bacteremia.
KeywordsBacteremia Ceftriaxone MSSA S. aureus United States Veterans
Conflicts of interest
No conflicts of interest to report.
- 7.Fowler VG, Sexton DJ. Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in adults. In: Post TW, editor. UpToDate. Waltham: UpToDate; 2010 (Accessed Oct 2010).Google Scholar
- 10.Stryjewski ME, Szczech LA, Benjamin DK Jr, Inrig JK, Kanafani ZA, Engemann JJ, et al. Use of vancomycin or first-generation cephalosporins for the treatment of hemodialysis-dependent patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:190–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Tice A, Siebold G, Martinelli L. Adverse effects from intravenous antibiotics with OPAT. Presented at the 40th annual meeting of the infectious diseases society of America, Chicago, IL. 2002.Google Scholar
- 15.Schmidt S, Rock K, Sahre M, Burkhardt O, Brunner M, Lobmeyer M, et al. Effect of protein binding on the pharmacological activity of highly bound antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;3994–4000.Google Scholar