Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 1260–1267 | Cite as

Attitudes of pharmacists to provision of Home Medicines Review for Indigenous Australians

  • Lindy SwainEmail author
  • Claire Griffits
  • Lisa Pont
  • Lesley Barclay
Research Article

Abstract

Back ground Home Medicines Reviews could improve the quality use of medicines and medicines adherence among Aboriginal people. Despite high level of chronic disease very few Home Medicines Review are currently being conducted for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Objective The aim of this research was to explore the barriers and facilitators from the pharmacists’ perspective for the provision of Home Medicines Review to Aboriginal people attending Aboriginal Health Services. Setting A cross sectional survey was used to gather demographic, qualitative and quantitative data from 945 Australian pharmacists accredited to undertake Home Medicines Review. Method The survey consisted of 39 items which included both closed, open ended and Likert scale questions. Data was extracted from the online survey tool and analysed. Descriptive statistics were used to explore the quantitative data while qualitative data was thematically analysed and coded for emergent themes. Main outcome measure Number of Home Medicines Review conducted for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients. Results A total of 187 accredited pharmacists responded to the survey. They reported that barriers to Home Medicines Review to Aboriginal patients may include lack of understanding of cultural issues by pharmacists; lack of awareness of Home Medicines Review program by Aboriginal Health Service staff; difficulties in implementation of Home Medicine Review processes; burdensome program rules; the lack of patient–pharmacist relationship, and the lack of pharmacist–Aboriginal Health Service relationship. Conclusion Changes to the medication review processes and rules are needed to improve the accessibility of the Home Medicine Review program for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Improved relationships between pharmacists and Aboriginal health service staff, would increase the likelihood of more Home Medicines Reviews being conducted with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients.

Keywords

Aboriginal Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Aboriginal Health Service Australian Barriers Home Medicines Review Indigenous Interprofessional Medication adherence Medicines Medication review Pharmacist Relationships 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank accredited pharmacists who participated in this survey.

Funding

This study was made possible by Sanofi Pamela Nieman Grant funding from the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia.

Conflicts of interest

No conflict of interest exists for any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Australian Government. Department of Health. Fifth Community Pharmacy Agreement. Home Medicines Review. http://5cpa.com.au/programs/medication-management-initiatives/home-medicines-review/. Accessed 5 Aug 2014.
  2. 2.
    Roughead E, Semple S, Vitry A. Pharmaceutical care services: a systematic review of published studies, 1990–2003, examining effectiveness in improving patient outcomes. Int J Pharm Pract. 2005;13:53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castelino R, Bajorek B, Chen T. Retrospective evaluation of home medicines review by pharmacists in older Australian patients using the medication appropriateness index. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44(12):1922–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework Report. Australian government: Department of Health and Ageing 2010. ISBN: 978-1-74241-525-3 Found at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/health-oatsih-pubs-framereport-toc. Accessed 5 Aug 2014.
  5. 5.
    Couzos S, Murray R. Health, human rights and the policy process. In: Couzos S, Murray R, editors. Aboriginal primary health care: an evidence-based approach. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 29–63. ISBN 9780195551389.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelaher M, Dunt D, Taylor-Thomson D, O’Donoghue L, Barnes T, et al. Improving access to medicines among clients of remote area Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Services. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2006;30(2):177–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davidson P, Abbott P, Davison J, DiGiacomo M. Improving medication uptake in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Heart Lung Circ. 2010;19(5):372–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamrosi K, Taylor S, Aslani P. Issues with prescribed medications in Aboriginal communities: Aboriginal health workers’ perspectives. Rural Remote Health. 6(2): 577. (Online) 2006. http://www.rrh.org.au/articles/subviewnew.asp?ArticleID=557. Accessed 30 March 2012.
  9. 9.
    Stoneman J, Taylor S. Improving access to medicines in urban, regional and rural Aboriginal communities–is expansion of Section 100 the answer. Rural Remote Health. 7(2): 738. (Online) 2007. www.rrh.org.au. Accessed 30 March 2012.
  10. 10.
    Swain L, Barclay L. They’ve given me that many tablets, I’m bushed. I don’t know where I’m going. Aust J Rural Health. 2013;21:216–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McRae M, Taylor S, Swain L, Sheldrake C. Evaluation of a pharmacist-led, medicines education program for Aboriginal Health Workers. Rural Remote Health 8(946). (Online) 2008. www.rrh.org.au. Accessed 30 March 2012.
  12. 12.
    Vaughan F. The challenges of HMR delivery to people in rural and remote areas. Aust J Pharm. 2003;84:96–7.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swain L, Barclay L. Exploration of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Isalnder Perspectives of Home Medicines Review. Submitted to Rural Remote Health Februrary 2012.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    AACP. AACP Australian Association of Consultant Pharmacists. (Online) no date. https://www.aacp.com.au/about/phsearch.html. Accessed 10 Aug 2012.
  15. 15.
    Health Workforce Australia. Health workforce by numbers.Issue 2—November 2013. http://www.hwa.gov.au/sites/uploads/HWA_Health-Workforce-by-Numbers_Issue-2_LR.pdf. Accessed 5 August 2014.
  16. 16.
    Campbell Research and Consulting. Home Medicines Review Program Qualitative Research Final Report. Australian government: Department of Health and Ageing, 2008. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/hmr-qualitative-research-final-report. Accessed 5 Aug 2014.
  17. 17.
    Australia Department of Health, Pharmacy Guild of Australia, Urbis Keys Young. Evaluation of the Home Medicines Review Program: Pharmacy Guild of Australia, 2005.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Australian Government.The Department of Health. Medication Management Review Data. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/Medication-Management-Review-Data. Accessed 5 Aug 2014.
  19. 19.
    Herrier R, Brownlee M, Hubbard S. Improving health care delivery through Interprofessional practice. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2004;44:651–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rigby D. Collaboration between doctors and pharmacists in the community. Aust Prescr. 2010;33:191–3.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frankel G, Austin Z. Responsibility and confidence: identifying barriers to advanced pharmacy practice. Can Pharm J. 2012;145(6):280–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rosenthal M, Breault R, Austin Z, Tsuyuki R. Pharmacists’ self-perception of their professional role: insights into community pharmacy culture. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2011;51:363–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Farris KB, Schopfloucher DP. Between intention and behaviour: an application of community pharmacists’ assessment of pharmaceutical care. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(1):55–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Swain L. Are rural and remote HMRs viable? Aust Pharm. 2012;31(3):184.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    National Australian Pharmacy Students’ Association.NAPSA rural and Indigenous affairs committee Indigenous health position statement. Found at: http://www.napsa.org.au/napsa-advocacy-and-position-statements/. Accessed 5 Aug 2014.
  26. 26.
    White L, Klinner C, Carter S. Consumer perspectives of the Australian Home Medicines Review Program: benefits and barriers. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012;8(1):4–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carter S, Moles R, White L, Chen T. Patients’ willingness to use a pharmacist-provided medication management service: the influence of outcome expectancies and communication efficacy. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012;8(6):487–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roughead E, Barratt J, Ramsay E, Pratt N, Ryan P, Peck R, et al. Collaborative home medicines review delays time to next hospitalization for warfarin associated bleeding in Australian war veterans. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2011;36:27–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lau P, Pyett P, Burchill M, Furler J, Tynan M, Kelaher M, et al. Factors influencing access to urban general practices and primary health cae by aboriginal australians—a qualitative study. Int J Indig Peo. 2012;8(1):66–84.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    McInman AD. What Aboriginal people think about their access to health care. Sydney: McInman Research Centre; 2000.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Andrews B, Simmons P, Long I, Wilson R. Identifying and overcoming the barriers to Aboriginal access to general practitioner services in rural New South Wales. Aust J Rural Health. 2002;10(4):196–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij ter bevordering der Pharmacie 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lindy Swain
    • 1
    Email author
  • Claire Griffits
    • 2
  • Lisa Pont
    • 3
  • Lesley Barclay
    • 1
  1. 1.University Centre for Rural Health, School of Public HealthUniversity of SydneyLismoreAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of PharmacyThe University of SydneyLismoreAustralia
  3. 3.Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Sydney Nursing SchoolThe University of SydneyLismoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations