International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 394–404 | Cite as

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of community pharmacists on generic medicines in Qatar

  • Ahmed AwaisuEmail author
  • Nadir Kheir
  • Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim
  • Maguy El-Hajj
  • Huda Hazi
  • Nada Khudair
  • Raja Barazi
Research Article


Background The practice of generic medicines prescribing, dispensing and substitution in developing countries has been controversial among healthcare professionals, particularly due to issues on quality, safety and efficacy. These controversies are as a result of inter-country differences in policies and laws as well as individualized knowledge and attitudes of pharmacists pertaining to generic medicines. Objective This study primarily aims to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of community pharmacists in Qatar towards generic medicines. Setting Community pharmacy settings throughout the State of Qatar. Method A cross-sectional study using a pretested paper-based survey was conducted among a random sample of community pharmacists in Qatar. The data were analyzed using IBM-SPSS® version 20. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were applied. Main outcome measure Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of generic medicines pertaining to regulatory standards, safety, efficacy, quality, and future policies. Results A total of 160 surveys were distributed to community pharmacists of which 118 were returned (response rate, 74 %). The mean total score of generic medicines knowledge among the pharmacists was 6.8 ± 1.6 (maximum possible score was 10). Years of practice as well as place of obtaining academic degree did not influence knowledge score. Approximately 72 % of the pharmacists supported generic substitution for brand name drugs in all cases where a generic medicine is available and the majority (93 %) agreed that pharmacists should be given generic substitution right. Nearly 61 % of the pharmacists considered lack of proven bioequivalence to original brands as an important barrier for selecting generic medicines and 55 % rated “lack of policy for directing the practice of generic medicine” as an important barrier. Conclusion In order to enhance the quality use of and to promote the practice of generic medicines in Qatar, an educational program should be implemented. A national generic medicine policy and guidelines are warranted in the State of Qatar.


Community pharmacists Generic medicines Qatar Substitution 



The authors thank all community pharmacists who voluntarily participated in this study.


This publication was made possible by a UREP award [UREP11-068-3-012] from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation).

Conflicts of interest

Statements made in this article are the sole responsibility of the authors. There are not other conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Cumming J, Mays N, Daubé J. How New Zealand has contained expenditure on drugs. BMJ. 2010;340:c2441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tordoff JM, Norris PT, Reith DM. Managing prices for hospital pharmaceuticals: a successful strategy for New Zealand? Value Health. 2005;8(3):201–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tordoff JM, Norris PT, Reith DM. Price management and its impact on hospital pharmaceutical expenditure and the availability of medicines in New Zealand hospitals. Value Health. 2008;11(7):1214–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Qatar Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare Report Q2 2010. [cited 2011 15 October];
  5. 5.
    Supreme Council of Health. [cited 2013 11 November];
  6. 6.
    Hamad Medical Corporation. Healthcare in Qatar. [cited 2013 11 November];
  7. 7.
    National Health Strategy 2011–2016. Comprehensive world class healthcare system. [cited 2013 15 November];
  8. 8.
    National Health Strategy 2011–2016. Comprehensive world class healthcare system: community pharmacies strategy [cited 2013 15 November];
  9. 9.
    Adelman C, Norris J. Generic medicines are not substandard medicines. Lancet. 2002;359(9314):1351–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association. Matching US generic drug use would save Canada $1.6-Billion, Toronto, April 6, 2010. Toronto: Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association; [cited 2011 20 October];
  11. 11.
    Kanavos P. Do generics offer significant savings to the UK National Health Service? Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(1):105–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karim SA, Pillai G, Ziqubu-Page T, Cassimjee M, Morar M. Potential savings from generic prescribing and generic substitution in South Africa. Health Policy Plan. 1996;11(2):198–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    King DR, Kanavos P. Encouraging the use of generic medicines: implications for transition economies. Croat Med J. 2002;43(4):462–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ford N, Hoen E. Generic medicines are not substandard medicines. Lancet. 2002;359(9314):1351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Perry G. The European generic pharmaceutical market in review: 2006 and beyond. J Generic Med. 2006;4(1):4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simoens S. Generic medicine pricing in Europe: current issues and future perspective. J Med Econ. 2008;11(1):171–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garattini L, Tediosi F. A comparative analysis of generics markets in five European countries. Health Policy. 2000;51(3):149–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Birkett DJ. Generics-equal or not? Austr Prescriber. 2003;26(4):85–7Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hassali A, Stewart K, Kong D. Quality use of generic medicines. Austr Prescriber. 2004;27:80–1Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lamy PP. Generic equivalents: issues and concerns. J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;26(5):309–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Babar Z-U-D, Grover P, Stewart J, Hogg M, Short L, Seo HG, et al. Evaluating pharmacists’ views, knowledge, and perception regarding generic medicines in New Zealand. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2011;7(3):294–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Campbell M, Bateman DN, Lee A, Smith J, Beaney A. The pros and cons of generic medicines. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995;8(4):362–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carroll NV, Wolfgang AP. Risks, benefits, and generic substitution. J Consum Aff. 1991;25(1):110–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meredith P. Bioequivalence and other unresolved issues in generic drug substitution. Clin Ther. 2003;25(11):2875–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barba Z-U-D, Awaisu A. Evaluating community pharmacists’ perceptions and practices on generic medicines: a pilot study from Peninsular Malaysia. J Generic Med. 2008;5(4):315–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Carroll NV, Siridhara C, Fincham JE. Perceived risks and pharmacists’ generic substitution behavior. J Consum Aff. 1986;20(1):36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carroll NV, Wolfgang AP. Inherent risk and market acceptance of generic drug products. J Health Care Mark. 1989;9(4):48–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cameron A, Ewen M, Ross-Degnan D, Ball D, Laing R. Medicine prices, availability, and affordability in 36 developing and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis. Lancet. 2009;373(9659):240–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cameron A, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Leufkens HGM, Laing RO. Switching from originator brand medicines to generic equivalents in selected developing countries: how much could be saved? Value Health. 2012;15(5):664–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kaplan WA, Ritz LS, Vitello M, Wirtz VJ. Policies to promote use of generic medicines in low and middle income countries: a review of published literature, 2000–2010. Health Policy. 2012;106(3):211–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mott DA, Cline RR. Exploring generic drug use behavior: the role of prescribers and pharmacists in the opportunity for generic drug use and generic substitution. Med Care. 2002;40(8):662–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jamshed SQ, Ibrahim MIM, Hassali MA, Babar ZUD, Alkalami R, Siddiqui MJ. Do hospital pharmacists in Pakistan understand the concept of generic medicines? a mixed-method approach. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2012;8(6):e17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jamshed SQ, Ibrahim MIM, Hassali MA, Babar ZUD, Alkalami R, Siddiqui MJ. Do community pharmacists understand the concept of generic medicines? A quantitative insight from Karachi, Pakistan. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012;8(6):e16–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Center for Drug Evaluation and Research FDA. Guidance for industry. Bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug products—general consideration. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2003 [cited 2013 13 March];…/Guidances/ucm070124.pdfGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Al-Gedadi NA, Hassali MA. Pharmacists’ views on generic medicines: a review of the literature. J Generic Med. 2008;5(3):209–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chong CP, Hassali MA, Bahari MB, Shafie AA. Evaluating community pharmacists’ perceptions of future generic substitution policy implementation: a national survey from Malaysia. Health Policy. 2010;94(1):68–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chong CP, Hassali MA, Bahari MB, Shafie AA. Exploring community pharmacists’ views on generic medicines: a nationwide study from Malaysia. Int J Clin Pharm. 2011;33(1):124–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chong CP, Hassali MA, Bahari MB, Shafie AA. Generic medicine substitution practices among community pharmacists: a nationwide study from Malaysia. J Public Health. 2011;19(1):81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chong CP, March G, Clark A, Gilbert A, Hassali MA, Bahari MB. A web-based survey on Australian community pharmacists’ perceptions and practices of generic substitution. J Generic Med. 2010;7(4):342–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chong CP, March G, Clark A, Gilbert A, Hassali MA, Bahari MB. A nationwide study on generic medicines substitution practices of Australian community pharmacists and patient acceptance. Health Policy. 2011;99(2):139–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hassali M, Kong D, Stewart K. Generic medicines: perceptions of community pharmacists in Melbourne, Australia. J Pharm Financ Econ Pol. 2005;14(3):27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bearden WO, Mason JB. Physician and pharmacist perceptions of generic drugs. Ind Mark Manag. 1979;8(1):63–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Granlund D. Are private physicians more likely to veto generic substitution of prescribed pharmaceuticals? Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(11):1643–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Paraponaris A, Verger P, Desquins B, Villani P, Bouvenot G, Rochaix L, et al. Delivering generics without regulatory incentives?: Empirical evidence from French general practitioners about willingness to prescribe international non-proprietary names. Health Policy. 2004;70(1):23–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Crawford P, Feely M, Guberman A, Kramer G. Are there potential problems with generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs? A review of issues. Seizure. 2006;15(3):165–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Borgheini G. The bioequivalence and therapeutic efficacy of generic versus brand-name psychoative drugs. Clin Ther. 2003;25(6):1578–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kesselheim AS, Misono AS, Lee JL, Stedman MR, Brookhart MA, Choudhry NK, et al. Clinical equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2008;300(21):2514–26PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Andersson K, Sonesson C, Petzold M, Carlsten A, Lönnroth K. What are the obstacles to generic substitution? An assessment of the behaviour of prescribers, patients and pharmacies during the first year of generic substitution in Sweden. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14(5):341–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Allenet B, Barry H. Opinion and behaviour of pharmacists towards the substitution of branded drugs by generic drugs: survey of 1,000 French community pharmacists. Pharm World Sci. 2003;25(5):197–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Vallès J-A, Barreiro M, Cereza G, Ferro J–J, Martınez MJ, et al. A prospective multicenter study of the effect of patient education on acceptability of generic prescribing in general practice. Health Policy. 2003;65(3):269–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij ter bevordering der Pharmacie 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmed Awaisu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Nadir Kheir
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maguy El-Hajj
    • 1
    • 2
  • Huda Hazi
    • 1
  • Nada Khudair
    • 1
  • Raja Barazi
    • 1
  1. 1.College of PharmacyQatar UniversityDohaQatar
  2. 2.Clinical Pharmacy and Practice Section, College of PharmacyQatar UniversityDohaQatar

Personalised recommendations