Assessment of pharmacist’s recommendation of non-prescription medicines in Brazil: a simulated patient study
- 459 Downloads
Background The number of medicines available without a prescription has increased in Brazil as elsewhere. The Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency recently passed a resolution emphasizing the role of Brazilian pharmacists in promoting rational use of medicines. However, evidence that Brazilian pharmacists monitor the use of non-prescription medicines in the community promoting rational use of medicines is lacking. Objective To assess practice behavior of pharmacists in Brazil when providing nonprescription medicines in the community pharmacy setting. Setting The study was conducted in 25 community pharmacies from a city of Aracaju in Brazil. Methods Simulated patients visited a convenience sample of 25 pharmacies twice from March to July 2010. During the visits, simulated patients enacted two standardized scenarios: treatment for a persistent headache and childhood diarrhea accompanied by fever. The interactions with the pharmacists were audiovisually recorded using a hidden micro camera. Recordings were later used to fill out a questionnaire designed to evaluate practice behavior of community pharmacists. Main outcome measure The communication and counseling skills of pharmacists in the recommendation of non-prescription medicines, aiming at the rational use of medicines. Results Pharmacists in the study spent on average 1.5 min counseling the simulated patient. At least one question was asked to assess signs and symptoms in 50.0 % of the simulated patient visits in the headache scenario and in 56.0 % of visits in the childhood diarrhea scenario. Non-pharmacological treatment was suggested in 25 % of visits in the childhood diarrhea scenario. During the counseling process, no pharmacist advised the simulated patient about possible drug interactions, adverse reactions and what to do if the patient forgot to take the medicine. The pharmacists had low scores in measures of non-verbal communication. The sample of this study presented poor communication skills, compromising the treatment of the patients. Conclusion This study showed that the pharmacists’ counseling in the simulated patient assessment was insufficient, indicating a need for substantial improvement in practice behavior.
KeywordsBrazil Non-prescription medicines Self-medication Simulated patients
The authors are grateful for the contribution of Dr Luciana de Fátima Rocha Pereira de Lyra, who trained our simulated patients.
The study was supported by grants from the Brazilian National Council for Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico).
Conflicts of interest
Authors report no conflicts of interest.
- 3.Brazil. Ministry of Health. Secretarial of Science, Technology and Strategic Inputs. Department of Pharmaceutical Services and Strategic Inputs. From the exceptionality of the care lines: The Specialized Component of Pharmaceutical Services. Ministry of Health. Secretarial of Science, Technology and Strategic Inputs. Department of Pharmaceutical Services and Strategic Inputs—Brasilia: Ministry of Health, 2010, ISBN 978-85-334-1745-8.Google Scholar
- 4.World Health Organization. Pan American Health Organization. http://www.paho.org/English/DD/AIS/cp_076.htm. Accessed 24 April 2006.
- 5.Brazil. Resolution No 44. Provides for Good Pharmaceutical Practices for the sanitary control of the operation, the dispensing and sale of products and the installment of pharmaceutical services in pharmacies and other measures. National Agency for Sanitary Vigilance 2009.Google Scholar
- 7.Taylor J. OTC counseling: review of pharmacists’ performance. Medscape Pharmacists 2001;2(2). www.medscape.com/viewarticle/408580. Accessed 24 April 2006.
- 9.World Health Organization. The role of the pharmacist in self-care and self-medication. Report of the 4th WHO Consultative Group on the role of the pharmacist. Hague, NL: Netherlands. Department of Essential Drugs and Other Medicines, 1998. WHO publication no. 98–13.Google Scholar
- 18.De Almeida Neto AC, Benrimoj SI, Kavanagh DJ, Boakes RA. Novel educational training program for community pharmacists. Am J Pharm Educ. 2000;64:302–7.Google Scholar
- 19.Boal A. Theatre of the oppressed and other poetics policies. Brazilian Civilization. 8th ed. Rio de Janeiro; 2008. ISBN: 10: 852000265X.Google Scholar
- 20.Boal A. Games for actors and non-actors. Brazilian Civilization. 12th ed. Rio de Janeiro; 2008. ISBN: 8520004806.Google Scholar
- 21.WGO. World Gastroenterology Organization. Practice guideline: acute diarrhea. Munich, Germany; 2008, Mar. 28 p.Google Scholar
- 22.WHO. World Health Organization. Medicines: rational use of medicines. Fact sheet no. 338, May 2010.Google Scholar
- 24.WHO. World Health Organization. The role of the pharmacist in the health care system. Report of a WHO Consultative Group. Tokyo, 1993. Granada, 1995;36:285–92.Google Scholar
- 29.Beardsley RS, Kimberlin CL, Tindall WN. Communication skills in pharmacy practice. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 2003. ISBN-10: 0781765986.Google Scholar
- 31.OPAS. Pan American Health Organization. Essential drugs and technology series. Guidelines to develop hospital pharmaceutical services: drug therapy for outpatients. Washington. D.C.; 1997. 61 p.Google Scholar
- 33.Mcdonough RP, Bennett MS. Improving communication skills of pharmacy students through effective precepting. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(3): article 58.Google Scholar
- 37.CNE, National Education Council. National Guidelines for the Graduation Teaching in Pharmacy, Brazil 2002 [National Guidance for the undergraduate Teaching of Pharmacy, Brazil 2002]. Official Gazette: Brasilia, Section 1.Google Scholar