Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 647–655 | Cite as

Assessment of pharmacist’s recommendation of non-prescription medicines in Brazil: a simulated patient study

  • Alessandra Rezende Mesquita
  • Dalmare Anderson Bezerra de Oliveira Sá
  • Ana Patrícia Alves Lima Santos
  • Abilio de Almeida Neto
  • Divaldo Pereira LyraJr.Email author
Research Article

Abstract

Background The number of medicines available without a prescription has increased in Brazil as elsewhere. The Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency recently passed a resolution emphasizing the role of Brazilian pharmacists in promoting rational use of medicines. However, evidence that Brazilian pharmacists monitor the use of non-prescription medicines in the community promoting rational use of medicines is lacking. Objective To assess practice behavior of pharmacists in Brazil when providing nonprescription medicines in the community pharmacy setting. Setting The study was conducted in 25 community pharmacies from a city of Aracaju in Brazil. Methods Simulated patients visited a convenience sample of 25 pharmacies twice from March to July 2010. During the visits, simulated patients enacted two standardized scenarios: treatment for a persistent headache and childhood diarrhea accompanied by fever. The interactions with the pharmacists were audiovisually recorded using a hidden micro camera. Recordings were later used to fill out a questionnaire designed to evaluate practice behavior of community pharmacists. Main outcome measure The communication and counseling skills of pharmacists in the recommendation of non-prescription medicines, aiming at the rational use of medicines. Results Pharmacists in the study spent on average 1.5 min counseling the simulated patient. At least one question was asked to assess signs and symptoms in 50.0 % of the simulated patient visits in the headache scenario and in 56.0 % of visits in the childhood diarrhea scenario. Non-pharmacological treatment was suggested in 25 % of visits in the childhood diarrhea scenario. During the counseling process, no pharmacist advised the simulated patient about possible drug interactions, adverse reactions and what to do if the patient forgot to take the medicine. The pharmacists had low scores in measures of non-verbal communication. The sample of this study presented poor communication skills, compromising the treatment of the patients. Conclusion This study showed that the pharmacists’ counseling in the simulated patient assessment was insufficient, indicating a need for substantial improvement in practice behavior.

Keywords

Brazil Non-prescription medicines Self-medication Simulated patients 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the contribution of Dr Luciana de Fátima Rocha Pereira de Lyra, who trained our simulated patients.

Funding

The study was supported by grants from the Brazilian National Council for Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico).

Conflicts of interest

Authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Kleinert S, Horton R. Brazil: towards sustainability and equity in health. Lancet. 2011;377:1721–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paim J, Travassos C, Almeida C, Bahia L, Macinko J. The Brazilian health system: history, advances, and challenges. Lancet. 2011;377:1778–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brazil. Ministry of Health. Secretarial of Science, Technology and Strategic Inputs. Department of Pharmaceutical Services and Strategic Inputs. From the exceptionality of the care lines: The Specialized Component of Pharmaceutical Services. Ministry of Health. Secretarial of Science, Technology and Strategic Inputs. Department of Pharmaceutical Services and Strategic Inputs—Brasilia: Ministry of Health, 2010, ISBN 978-85-334-1745-8.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Health Organization. Pan American Health Organization. http://www.paho.org/English/DD/AIS/cp_076.htm. Accessed 24 April 2006.
  5. 5.
    Brazil. Resolution No 44. Provides for Good Pharmaceutical Practices for the sanitary control of the operation, the dispensing and sale of products and the installment of pharmaceutical services in pharmacies and other measures. National Agency for Sanitary Vigilance 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Watson MC, Skelton JR, Bond CM, Croft P, Wiskin CM, Grimshaw JM, et al. Simulated patients in the community pharmacy setting: using simulated patients to measure practice in the community pharmacy setting. Pharm World Sci. 2004;26:32–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taylor J. OTC counseling: review of pharmacists’ performance. Medscape Pharmacists 2001;2(2). www.medscape.com/viewarticle/408580. Accessed 24 April 2006.
  8. 8.
    de Oliveira MA, Francisco PM, Costa KS, Barros MB. Self-medication in the elderly population of Campinas, São Paulo State, Brazil: prevalence and associated factors. Cad Saude Publica. 2012;28(2):335–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Health Organization. The role of the pharmacist in self-care and self-medication. Report of the 4th WHO Consultative Group on the role of the pharmacist. Hague, NL: Netherlands. Department of Essential Drugs and Other Medicines, 1998. WHO publication no. 98–13.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Albarrán KF, Zapata LV. Analysis and quantification of self-medication patterns of customers in community pharmacies in southern Chile. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30:863–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hughes CM, McElnay JC, Fleming GF. Benefits and risks of self medication. Drug Saf. 2001;24:1027–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schneider CR, Everett AW, Geelhoed E, Kendall PA, Clifford RM. Measuring the assessment and counseling provided with the supply of non-prescription asthma reliever medication: a simulated patient study. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:1512–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Svarstad BL, Bultman DC, Mount JK. Patient counseling provided in community pharmacies: effects of state regulation, pharmacist age, and busyness. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2004;44:22–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berger K, Eickhoff C, Schulz M. Counselling quality in community pharmacies: implementation of the pseudo customer methodology in Germany. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2005;30:45–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Benrimoj SI, Werner JB, Raffaele C, Roberts AS, Costa FA. Monitoring quality standards in the provision of non-prescription medicines from Australian Community Pharmacies: results of a national programme. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:354–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weiss MC, Booth A, Jones B, Ramjeet S, Wong E. Use of simulated patients to assess the clinical and communication skills of community pharmacists. Pharm World Sci. 2010;32:353–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mesquita AR, Lyra DP Jr, Brito GC, Balisa-Rocha BJ, Aguiar PM, De Almeida Neto AC. Developing communication skills in pharmacy: a systematic review of the use of simulated patient methods. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78:143–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Almeida Neto AC, Benrimoj SI, Kavanagh DJ, Boakes RA. Novel educational training program for community pharmacists. Am J Pharm Educ. 2000;64:302–7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boal A. Theatre of the oppressed and other poetics policies. Brazilian Civilization. 8th ed. Rio de Janeiro; 2008. ISBN: 10: 852000265X.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boal A. Games for actors and non-actors. Brazilian Civilization. 12th ed. Rio de Janeiro; 2008. ISBN: 8520004806.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    WGO. World Gastroenterology Organization. Practice guideline: acute diarrhea. Munich, Germany; 2008, Mar. 28 p.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    WHO. World Health Organization. Medicines: rational use of medicines. Fact sheet no. 338, May 2010.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu T, de Almeida Neto AC, Moles RJ. Simulated caregivers: their feasibility in educating pharmacy staff to manage children’s ailments. Int J Clin Pharm. 2012;34:587–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    WHO. World Health Organization. The role of the pharmacist in the health care system. Report of a WHO Consultative Group. Tokyo, 1993. Granada, 1995;36:285–92.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Porteous T, Ryan M, Bond CM, Hannaford P. Preferences for self-care or professional advice for minor illness: a discrete choice experiment. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56(533):911–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yousef AMM, Al-Bakri AG, Bustanji Y, Wazaify M. Self-medication patterns in Amman, Jordan. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30:24–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dyck A, Deschamps M, Taylor J. Pharmacists’ discussions of medication side effects: a descriptive study. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;56:21–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cleland J, Francis J, Watson M, Inch J, Bond C. Using theory to improve communication: designing a communication skills training package for medicine counter assistants. Int J Pharm Pract. 2007;15:79–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Beardsley RS, Kimberlin CL, Tindall WN. Communication skills in pharmacy practice. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 2003. ISBN-10: 0781765986.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Williams MV, et al. Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals. JAMA. 1995;274(21):677–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    OPAS. Pan American Health Organization. Essential drugs and technology series. Guidelines to develop hospital pharmaceutical services: drug therapy for outpatients. Washington. D.C.; 1997. 61 p.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Norris PT. Purchasing restricted medicines in New Zealand pharmacies: results from a ‘‘mystery shopper’’ study. Pharm World Sci. 2002;24(4):149–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mcdonough RP, Bennett MS. Improving communication skills of pharmacy students through effective precepting. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(3): article 58.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shah B, Chewning B. Conceptualizing and measuring pharmacist-patient communication: a review of published studies. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006;2:153–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ali F, Laurin MY, Lariviere C, Tremblay D, Cloutier D. The effect of pharmacist intervention and patient education on lipid-lowering medication compliance and plasma cholesterol levels. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;10:101–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dolovich L, Sabharwal M, Agro K, Foster G, Lee A, McCarthy L, et al. The effect of pharmacist education on asthma treatment plans for simulated patients. Pharm World Sci. 2007;29:228–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    CNE, National Education Council. National Guidelines for the Graduation Teaching in Pharmacy, Brazil 2002 [National Guidance for the undergraduate Teaching of Pharmacy, Brazil 2002]. Official Gazette: Brasilia, Section 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandra Rezende Mesquita
    • 1
  • Dalmare Anderson Bezerra de Oliveira Sá
    • 1
  • Ana Patrícia Alves Lima Santos
    • 1
  • Abilio de Almeida Neto
    • 2
  • Divaldo Pereira LyraJr.
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS)Federal University of SergipeSão CristóvãoBrazil
  2. 2.Australian Health Practitioner Regulation AgencySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations