Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 513–519 | Cite as

Pharmaceutical follow-up for patients on rituximab therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: what is the evidence?

  • Vanessa HegeleEmail author
  • Paula Stoll
  • Diego Wüst
  • Guilherme Ehrenbrink
  • Luiza Raquel Grazziotin
  • Juliana Prohonoski Caregnato
  • Luciane Pereira Lindenmeyer
Review Article

Abstract

Background Introduction of the monoclonal antibody rituximab to chemotherapy regimens has substantially improved disease-free and overall survival in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). The short-term safety of this drug has been widely reported, but there are few data on long-term safety, which suggests that these patients require prolonged follow-up. Aim of the review To review the literature on follow-up models, with a focus on the safety of rituximab therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma. Method The Cochrane Library, Embassy, Lilacs, Medline, and Scirus databases were searched for systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. Furthermore, textbooks and journals on pharmaceutical care and institutional websites were searched for patient management recommendations. The outcomes were follow-up models and grade 3, 4, and 5 adverse reactions. Results Five systematic reviews and eight clinical trials or updates describing patient follow-up or reporting adverse reactions were identified. Only one systematic review and seven clinical trials reported follow-up routines for patients receiving rituximab, including information on staging, frequency of reassessment, and laboratory tests, as well as pre-infusion care and management of acute or delayed adverse reactions. Five systematic reviews and four clinical trials reported data on statistically significant adverse reactions (fever, leukopenia, infection). Four guidelines or institutional protocols for treatment and follow-up were identified, as well as seven studies describing experiences in the implementation of pharmaceutical care for oncology patients, but none were specifically focused on follow-up of patients receiving rituximab for NHL. Conclusion Although some systematic reviews and clinical trials contain guidance on follow-up of patients receiving rituximab for NHL, there are no validated strategies for systematic follow-up of these patients with a focus on safety. As there are few data on long-term safety profile of these novel treatments, monitoring strategies should be developed and implemented to ensure safe and optimized use of drugs recently added to the therapeutic arsenal of clinical oncology.

Keywords

Adverse drug reaction Drug-related problem Hematology Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma Oncology Pharmaceutical care Pharmacovigilance Rituximab 

Notes

Acknowledgments

To the care team oncology and hematology at the Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Grupo Hospitalar Conceição, Ministry of Health, Brazil.

Funding

Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa).

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Australian Cancer Network Diagnosis and Management of Lymphoma Guidelines Working Party. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of lymphoma. Sydney: The Cancer Council Australia and Australian Cancer Network; 2005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zelenetz AD, Abramson JS, Advani RH, Andreadis CB, Byrd JC, Czuczman MS, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in oncology: non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8(3):288–334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rituximabe no tratamento do linfoma difuso de grandes células B [Rituximab in the treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma]. Brazilian Bulletin on Health Technology Assessment (BRATS) [serial on the Internet]. 2009;4(10); Available from: http://200.214.130.94/rebrats/brats.php.
  4. 4.
    Cheung MC, Haynes AE, Meyer RM, Stevens A, Imrie KR. Rituximab in lymphoma: a systematic review and consensus practice guideline from Cancer Care Ontario. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007;33(2):161–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Habermann TM, Weller EA, Morrison VA, Gascoyne RD, Cassileth PA, Cohn JB, et al. Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(19):3121–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marcus R, Imrie K, Belch A, Cunningham D, Flores E, Catalano J, et al. CVP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CVP as first-line treatment for advanced follicular lymphoma. Blood. 2005;105(4):1417–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, Herbrecht R, Tilly H, Bouabdallah R, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(4):235–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freedman A, Friedberg J. Initial treatment of follicular lymphoma. 2013 [cited 2013 03/31/2013]; Available from: http://www.uptodate.com.
  9. 9.
    Ghielmini M, Schmitz SF, Cogliatti SB, Pichert G, Hummerjohann J, Waltzer U, et al. Prolonged treatment with rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma significantly increases event-free survival and response duration compared with the standard weekly × 4 schedule. Blood. 2004;103(12):4416–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knight C, Hind D, Brewer N, Abbott V. Rituximab (MabThera) for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(37):iii, ix–xi, 1–82.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Oers MH, Klasa R, Marcus RE, Wolf M, Kimby E, Gascoyne RD, et al. Rituximab maintenance improves clinical outcome of relapsed/resistant follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma in patients both with and without rituximab during induction: results of a prospective randomized phase 3 intergroup trial. Blood. 2006;108(10):3295–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheson BD, Leonard JP. Monoclonal antibody therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(6):613–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    MabThera® (rituximab). F. Hoffmann-La Roche; 2013 [cited 2013 03/31/2013]; Available from: http://www.dialogoroche.com.br/content/dam/dialogo/pt_br/Bulas/M/MabThera/mabthera-profissional-20120119.pdf.
  14. 14.
    van Oers MH, Van Glabbeke M, Giurgea L, Klasa R, Marcus RE, Wolf M, et al. Rituximab maintenance treatment of relapsed/resistant follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: long-term outcome of the EORTC 20981 phase III randomized intergroup study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(17):2853–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ivama A, Noblat L, de Castro M, de Oliveira N, Jaramillo N, Rech N. Consenso Brasileiro de Atenção Farmacêutica [Brazilian Consensus on Pharmaceutical Care]. 1st ed. Brasília: Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde; 2002.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jaehde U, Liekweg A, Simons S, Westfeld M. Minimising treatment-associated risks in systemic cancer therapy. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30(2):161–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hepler CD, Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990;47(3):533–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gao G, Liang X, Jiang J, Zhou X, Huang R, Chu Z, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of immunochemotherapy with rituximab for B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Acta Oncol. 2010;49(1):3–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schulz H, Bohlius J, Skoetz N, Trelle S, Kober T, Reiser M, Dreyling M, Herold M, Schwarzer G, Hallek M, Engert A. Chemotherapy plus Rituximab versus chemotherapy alone for B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(4). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003805.pub2.
  20. 20.
    Rafailidis PI, Kakisi OK, Vardakas K, Falagas ME. Infectious complications of monoclonal antibodies used in cancer therapy: a systematic review of the evidence from randomized controlled trials. Cancer. 2007;109(11):2182–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vidal L, Gafter-Gvili A, Leibovici L, Shpilberg O. Rituximab as maintenance therapy for patients with follicular lymphoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(2). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006552.pub2.
  22. 22.
    Martí-Carvajal AJ, Cardona AF, Lawrence A. Interventions for previously untreated patients with AIDS-associated non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD005419.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Coiffier B, Thieblemont C, Van Den Neste E, Lepeu G, Plantier I, Castaigne S, et al. Long-term outcome of patients in the LNH-98.5 trial, the first randomized study comparing rituximab-CHOP to standard CHOP chemotherapy in DLBCL patients: a study by the Groupe d’Etudes des Lymphomes de l’Adulte. Blood. 2010;116(12):2040–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Feugier P, Van Hoof A, Sebban C, Solal-Celigny P, Bouabdallah R, Fermé C, et al. Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(18):4117–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaplan LD, Lee JY, Ambinder RF, Sparano JA, Cesarman E, Chadburn A, et al. Rituximab does not improve clinical outcome in a randomized phase 3 trial of CHOP with or without rituximab in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin lymphoma: AIDS-Malignancies Consortium Trial 010. Blood. 2005;106(5):1538–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pfreundschuh M, Schubert J, Ziepert M, Schmits R, Mohren M, Lengfelder E, et al. Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60). Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(2):105–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    CHOP-R. Ontario: Juravinski Cancer Centre; 2008 [cited 2013 03/12/2013]; Available from: http://www.jcc.hhsc.ca/workfiles/PHARMACY/HE-CHOP-R.pdf.
  28. 28.
    Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Version 1.2013 ed: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2012.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Guidance on the administration of rituximab infusions. London: The North London Cancer Network; 2009 [cited 2013 03/31/2013]; Available from: http://www.nlcn.nhs.uk/BChemoGui.
  30. 30.
    Guidelines for the management of tumour lysis syndrome. London: The North London Cancer Network; 2010 [cited 2013 03/31/2013]; Available from: http://www.nlcn.nhs.uk/BChemoGui.
  31. 31.
    Broadfield L. Pharmaceutical care in oncology pharmacy practice: a method for using outcome indicators. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 1995;1(1):9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cavero Rodrigo E, Climente Martí M, Navarro Fontestad MC, Jiménez Torres NV. Quality assessment of two pharmaceutical care models for onco-haematological patients. Farm Hosp. 2007;31(4):231–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wong S, Gray E. Clinical pharmacy services in oncology clinics. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 1999;5(1):49–54.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Knez L, Laaksonen R, Duggan C. Evaluation of clinical interventions made by pharmacists in chemotherapy preparation. Radiol Oncol. 2010;44(4):249–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Serrano-Fabiá A, Cavero Rodrigo E, Albert Marí A, Almenar Cubells D, Jiménez Torres NV. Pharmaceutical validation as a process of improving the quality of antineoplastic treatment. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2005;11(2):45–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Serrano-Fabiá A, Albert-Marí A, Almenar-Cubells D, Jiménez-Torres NV. Multidisciplinary system for detecting medication errors in antineoplastic chemotherapy. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2010;16(2):105–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bremberg E, Hising C, Nylen U, Ehrsson H, Eksborg S. An evaluation of pharmacist contribution to an oncology ward in a Swedish hospital. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2006;12(2):75–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, Ozer H, Armitage JO, Balducci L, et al. 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(19):3187–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Eisenach M. Pharmaceutical counseling. In: Pharmacy GSoO, editor. QuapoS 4: quality standard for the oncology pharmacy service with commentary. Hamburg: European Society of Oncology Pharmacy (ESOP); 2009. p. 452.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Castro M, Fuchs F, Ferreira M. Reflexão sobre a prática e o ensino do seguimento farmacoterapêutico de pacientes [Reflection on the practice and teaching of patients pharmacotherapeutic follow-up]. In: Storpirtis S, Mori A, Yochiy A, Ribeiro E, Porta V, editors. Farmácia Clínica e Atenção Farmacêutica [Clinical pharmacy and pharmaceutical care]. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2008.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Witzel M. Aspectos conceituais e filosóficos da Assistência Farmacêutica, Farmácia Clínica e Atenção Farmacêutica [Conceptual and philosophical aspects of pharmaceutical services, clinical pharmacy and pharmaceutical care]. In: Storpirtis S, Mori A, Yochiy A, Ribeiro E, Porta V, editors. Farmácia Clínica e Atenção Farmacêutica [Clinical pharmacy and pharmaceutical care]. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2008.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Simons S, Ringsdorf S, Braun M, Mey UJ, Schwindt PF, Ko YD, et al. Enhancing adherence to capecitabine chemotherapy by means of multidisciplinary pharmaceutical care. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19(7):1009–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Moreira R. Suggesting pharmacotherapeutical follow-up in chronic myeloid leukemia: a methodological approach model. Braz J Oncol. 2009;55(4):375–8.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Omoti C, Agada L. Compliance with chemotherapy in adult leukemia patients in Benin City, Nigeria. Seguimiento Farmacoterapéutico. 2005;3(1):1–9.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Eliasson L, Clifford S, Barber N, Marin D. Exploring chronic myeloid leukemia patients’ reasons for not adhering to the oral anticancer drug imatinib as prescribed. Leuk Res. 2011;35(5):626–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Denois V, Nourissat A, Jacquin J, Guastalla J, Chauvin F. Adherence with oral chemotherapy: results from a qualitative study of the behaviour and representations of patients and oncologists. Eur J Cancer Care. 2011;20(4):520–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Oakley C. Developing an intervention for cancer patients prescribed oral chemotherapy: a generic patient diary. Eur J Cancer Care. 2010;19(1):21–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Williamson S. Management of oral anticancer therapies. Pharm J. 2008;281(7522):399–402.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Forster AJ, Halil RB, Tierney MG. Pharmacist surveillance of adverse drug events. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61(14):1466–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Winterstein AG, Hatton RC, Gonzalez-Rothi R, Johns TE, Segal R. Identifying clinically significant preventable adverse drug events through a hospital’s database of adverse drug reaction reports. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002;59(18):1742–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Roscoe J, Goransson E, Slancar M, Smith J, Taylor S, Tyson S. A multidisciplinary approach to ensure safety in the prescribing and administration of chemotherapy. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2000;6(2):60–3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vanessa Hegele
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paula Stoll
    • 1
  • Diego Wüst
    • 1
  • Guilherme Ehrenbrink
    • 1
  • Luiza Raquel Grazziotin
    • 1
  • Juliana Prohonoski Caregnato
    • 1
  • Luciane Pereira Lindenmeyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Grupo Hospitalar ConceiçãoPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations