Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 22–29 | Cite as

Legibility of USP pictograms by clients of community pharmacies in Portugal

  • Maria Augusta SoaresEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Background Effective and safe use of medicines depends on patients’ good understanding of the pharmacotherapy. Pictograms are a communication tool, as complement of verbal/written information, to facilitate drug use and, avoiding errors, being useful for drug effectiveness and safety. Objective To assess the ability of pharmacy’s clients, in understanding USP pictograms, establishing the relationship with their socio demographic profiles. Setting The study was developed in community pharmacies, in Lisbon region. Methods Cross sectional study, carried out in pharmacies in Lisbon. A structured questionnaire was used in pharmacies clients of 18 years old and above. Legibility of fifteen USP pictograms was studied using ISO and ANSI criteria. Correlation between the legibility of pictograms and pharmacies clients’ demographic profile (age, gender, scholarship, frequency of medicines use) was evaluated. SPSS data base version 18 was used for descriptive analysis. Main outcome measure Legibility of fifteen United States Pharmacopeia (USP) pictograms and, its relationship with clients’ demographic data (scholarship degree, age, frequency of medicines use and, gender) was studied. Results From 751 responders, ten pictograms were legible by ISO and seven by ANSI. More than 30 % of the responders weren’t able to understand five of the pictograms. It was found statistically significant relationships between some the understanding of some pictograms and clients’ scholarships degree, age and frequency of medicines use. Conclusion It was found that not all the fifteen tested USP pictograms were correctly comprehended by Portuguese pharmacies’ clients, having found correlations with scholarship degree, daily use of medicines and age group, for some pictograms. To ensure the effectiveness of USP pictograms it is advisable to test patients’ comprehension, before their use in general practice.

Keywords

ANSI Instructions ISO Legibility Medicines Pharmacy clients Pictograms Pictures Portugal Scholarship 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to pharmacy students that conduct the interviews and data collection and to the panel of pharmacists that collaborated in the study. We would also like to thank Afonso Cavaço for reviewing the manuscript.

Funding

There was no funding for the study.

Conflicts of interest

I confirm that there is no conflict of interest of the author concerning this study. I confirm all clients identifiers have not been collected so they can’t be identified.

References

  1. 1.
    Sorensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, Brand H. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gazmararian JA, Baker DW, Williams MV, Parker RM, Scott TL, Green DC, Fehrenbach SN, Ren J, Koplan JP. Health literacy among medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. JAMA. 1999;281(6):545–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shea JA, Beers BB, McDonald VJ, Quistberg DA, Ravenell KL, Asch DA. Assessing health literacy in African American and Caucasian adults: disparities in Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) Scores. Fam Med. 2004;36(8):575–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Williams MV, Parker RM, Baker DW, Parikh NS, Pitkin K, Coates WC, Nurss JR. Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals. JAMA. 1995;274(21):1677–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis TC, Wolf MS, Bass PF III, Middlebrooks M, Kennen E, Baker DW, Bennett CL, Durazo-Arvizu R, Bocchini A, Savory S, Parker RM. Low literacy impairs comprehension of prescription drug warning labels. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(8):847–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wolf MS, Davis TC, Tilson HH, Bass PF, Parker RM. Misunderstanding of prescription drug warning labels among patients with low literacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006;63(11):1048–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis T, Wolf M, Bass P, Thompson J, Tilson H, Neuberger M, Parker R. Literacy and misunderstanding prescription drug labels. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(12):887–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kripalani S, Robertson R, Love-Ghaffari MH, Henderson LE, Praska J, Strawder A, Katz MG, Jacobson TA. Development of an illustrated medication schedule as a low-literacy patient education tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66(3):368–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katz MG, Kripalani S, Weiss BD. Use of pictorial aids in medication instructions: a review of the literature. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2006;63:2391–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raynor DK. Addressing medication literacy: a pharmacy practice priority. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009;17(5):257–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pascuet E, Dawson J, Vaillancourt R. A picture worth a thousand words. The use of pictograms for medication labelling. Int Pharm J. 2008;23(1):1–4.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mansoor L, Dowse R. Written medicines information for South African HIV/AIDS patients: does it enhance understanding of co-trimoxazole therapy? Health Educ Res. 2007;22(1):37–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kitching JB. Patient information leaflets-the state of the art. J R Soc Med. 1990;83:298–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dowse R, Ehlers M. Pictograms for conveying medicine instructions: comprehension in various South African language groups. S Afr J Sci. 2004;100:687–93.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61:173–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sorfleet C, Vaillancourt R, Groves S, Dawson J. Design, development and evaluation of pictographic instructions for medications used during humanitarian missions. Can Pharm J. 2009;142:82–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Teixeira J, Pacheco GS, Toreti IR. Assessing pictogram use on assisting to patient pharmacotherapy adherence. Seguimiento Farmacoterapéutico. 2003;1(3):127–35.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yin HS, Dreyer BP, van Schaick L, Foltin GL, Dinglas C, Mendelsohn AL. Randomized controlled trial of a pictogram-based intervention to reduce liquid medication dosing errors and improve adherence among caregivers of young children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(9):814–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Galato F, Just MC, Galato D, Silva WB. Desenvolvimento e Validação de Pictogramas para o Uso Correto de Medicamentos: descrição de um Estudo-Piloto. Acta Farm Bonaerense. 2006;25(1):131–8.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Austin PE, Matlack R, Dunn KA, Kesler C, Brown CK. Discharge instructions: do illustrations help our patients understand them? Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25(3):317–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Houts PS, Bachrach R, Witmer JT, Tringali CA, Bucher JA, Localio RA. Using pictographs to enhance recall of spoken medical instructions. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;35(2):83–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sampaio LF, Silva LML, Velho GCC, Martins MGG, Selma R, Castilho SR, Altenburg SP. Pictograms as a medical prescription language comprehension. Rev Bras Farm. 2008;89(2):150–4.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kalsher MJ, Wogalter MS, Racicot BM. Pharmaceutical container labels: enhancing preference perceptions with alternative designs and pictorials. Int J Ind Ergon. 1996;18:83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mansoor LE, Dowse R. Design and evaluation of a new pharmaceutical pictogram sequence to convey medicine usage. Ergon SA. 2004;2:29–41.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hameen-Anttila K, Kemppainen K, Enlund H, Bush Patricia J, Marja A. Do pictograms improve children’s understanding of medicine leaflet information? Patient Educ Couns. 2004;55(3):371–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dowse R, Ehlers M. Medicine labels incorporating pictograms: do they influence understanding and adherence? Patient Educ Couns. 2005;58:63–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chuang MH, Lin CL, Wang YF, Cham TM. Development of pictographs depicting medication use instructions for low-literacy medical clinic ambulatory patients. J Manag Care Pharm. 2010;16(5):337–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dowse R, Ehlers MS. The evaluation of pharmaceutical pictograms in a low-literate South African population. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;45:87–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dotson A. Use of a pictorial medication labeling system to improve comprehension of drug information and adherence to drug regimen: a randomized trial among pregnant women in a rural maternal and child health clinic in Kutch, India. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health; 2009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Social Pharmacy, Faculty of PharmacyResearch Institute for Medicines and Pharmaceutical Sciences (iMed.UL), Lisbon UniversityLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations