Advertisement

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 876–884 | Cite as

Career paths and personality in pharmacy

  • Maria CordinaEmail author
  • Mary-Anne Lauri
  • Josef Lauri
Research Article

Abstract

Background Pharmacists choose different career paths which may have different requirements in terms of demands and environments, irrespective of knowledge and intellectual capability. A contributing factor could be personality whereby pharmacists seek to work in an environment which is compatible with their personality. Objective To explore the relationship between personality and career paths taken by pharmacists. Methods Data regarding pharmacists’ personality profile as determined by The Gordon Personal Profile Inventory (GPPI) were gathered using an anonymous survey. The inventory booklet was mailed to all pharmacists registered to practice in Malta who were at the time residing in the country. Demographic data and information regarding areas of practice was also gathered. Analysis was carried out using variety of statistical tests including t-test, Manova and Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Results Most of the types of pharmacists considered, lie somewhat close to the average categories of the GPPI attributes, with those who work in importation and wholesale being the ones who stand out most from the rest by scoring high on self esteem, ascendency, original thinking, vigour, sociability. Those who work in industry and, especially, in hospitals are the two categories of pharmacists who seem to score low on the GPPI traits in general, while those who work in the Community scored high in personal relations and are a little more likely to score higher in cautiousness and responsibility. Conclusion Pharmacists are not a homogeneous group of individuals. It is evident that their personality is a significant factor in the career path that they have chosen. Not all pharmacists possess personalities that are conducive to patient-oriented practice. Those that do not primarily possess the latter personality traits, appear to have chosen to practice in non-traditional areas where, possibly, they have found a good fit with their personality and other factors.

Keywords

Career Gordon Personal Profile-Inventory Personality Pharmacists 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Mr. Joseph Busuttil, Registrar, Pharmacy Council, Malta for his assistance in interpreting the data gathered by Pharmacy Council relating to pharmacist employment patterns.

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union on the recognition of professional qualifications. European Union Directive 2005/36/EC, Official Journal of the European Union 2005. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2005:255:0022:0142:en:PDF. Accessed July 23, 2012.
  2. 2.
    The University of Malta, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Department of Pharmacy, Course description, Bachelor of Pharmacy. http://www.um.edu.mt/ms/overview/UBPHFT-2010-1-O. Accessed July 23, 2012.
  3. 3.
    Laws of Malta. Subsidiary Legislation 464.12. Pharmacy Council (standing orders) regulations. Legal Notice 196 of 2007. http://www.mjha.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lom&itemid=11306&l=1 Accessed July 23, 2012.
  4. 4.
    The Pharmacy Council, Malta. Annual Report 2010. https://ehealth.gov.mt/healthportal/others/regulatory_councils/pharmacy_council/pharmacy_council.aspx. Accessed July 23, 2012.
  5. 5.
    Schwartz B. The tyranny of choice. Sci Am. 2004;4:70–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holland JL. Making Vocational choices: a theory of Careers. 3rd ed. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs; 1997. ISBN 978-0135478288.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dawis RV, Lofquist LH. A psychological theory of work adjustment: an individual differences model and its applications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1984. ISBN 978-0816613168.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prediger DJ. Holland’s Hexagon is alive and well-though somewhat out of shape. Response to Tinsley. J Vocat Behav. 2000;56:197–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gottfredson GD, John L. Holland’ contribution to vocational psychology: a review and evaluation. J Vocat Behav. 1999;55:15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chaudri U, Syms MM. A personality profile of year one pharmacy students and lecturers using the Myers-Briggs Type indicator. Pharm J. 1999;263:R50–1.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kittisopee T. Association among pharmacy student’s personality and career preferences. Thai J Pharm Sci. 2003;27:81–90.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shuck AA, Philips CR. Assessing pharmacy students’ learning styles and personality types: a ten-year analysis. Am J Pharm Educ. 1999;63:27–33.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lowenthal W. Myers Briggs type inventory preferences of pharmacy students and practitioners. Eval Health Prof. 1994;17:22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cordina M, Lauri MA, Lauri J. Patient-oriented personality traits of first year pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(5):84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nimmo CM, Holland RW. Transitions in pharmacy practice, part 4: can a leopard change its spots? Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1999;56:2458–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schein EH. Careers anchors revisited: implications for career development in the 21st century. Acad Manag Executive. 1996;10(4):80–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van Rensburg S, Rothmann JC, Rothmann S. The relationship between personality characteristics and career anchors of pharmacists. Manag Dyn. 2003;12:24–33.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holland RW, Nimmo CM. Transitions part 1: beyond pharmaceutical care. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1999;56:1758–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nimmo CM, Holland RW. Transitions in pharmacy practice, part 2: who does what and why. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1999;56:1981–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    World Health Organisation. Good pharmacy practice in community and hospital settings: annex 7 to the thirty-fifth report of the WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations. WHO technical report series no.885 Geneva, Switzerland WHO 1990; 93–101.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    World Health Organisation in collaboration with international pharmaceutical federation. Developing pharmacy practice: a focus on patient care. WHO/PSM/PAR/2006.5.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bouvy M, Dessing R Duchateau F. White paper on Pharmacy in the Netherlands: position on pharmacy, pharmacists and pharmacy practice. Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association 2011. http://www.knmp.nl/over-de-knmp/downloads/over-de-knmp/knmp-vereniging/Witboek_eng.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2012.
  23. 23.
    American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. Future pharmacy graduates- Making more opportunities than we see. White Paper prepared for AACP Curricular Change Summit 2009. http://www.aacp.org/meetingsandevents/othermeetings/curricularchangesummit/Documents/Future%20Pharmacy%20Graduates%20%E2%80%93%20Making%20More%20Opportunities%20Than%20We%20See.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2012.
  24. 24.
    Gordon LV. The Gordon Personal Profile-Inventory (GPPI) Global edition. London, England. The NFER-Nelson Publishing Company; 1993. Code 1170734.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cocolas GH, Sleath B, Hanson-Divers EC. Use of Gordon Personal Profile-Inventory of pharmacists and pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 1997;61:257–65.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Dyer FJ. Gordon Personal Profile-Inventory, an Interpretive Guide. San Antonio; The Psychological Corporation; 1984. OCLC 13058995.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gottfredson GD, Jones EM, Holland JL. Personality and vocational interests: the relation of Holland’s six interest dimensions to five robust dimensions of personality. J Couns Psychol. 1993;40:518–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cassar V, Bezzina C. People must change before institutions can: a model addressing the challenge from administering to managing the Maltese public service. Public Admin Dev. 2005;25:205–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mathis RL, Jackson JH. Human resource management. 12th ed. Mason OH, USA: South-Western College Publications; 2007. ISBN 978-0-538-48570-0.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lowenthal W. Myers-Briggs Type Inventory preferences of pharmacy students and practioners. Eval Health Prof. 1994;17:22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Manasse HR Jr, Kabat HF, Wertheeimer AI. Professional socialization in pharmacy 1: a cross-sectional analysis of personality characteristics of agents and objects of socialisation. Drugs Health Care. 1976;3:3–18.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lauri MA, Cordina M, Lauri J, Mifsud D. Choosing the pharmacy course: the need for guidance and counseling in preparation for higher education. Pharm Educ. 2011;11:85–90.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Holland L. Exploring careers with topology: what we have learned and some new directions. Am Psychol. 1996;51:397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Pro-RectorUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta

Personalised recommendations