Community pharmacists’ attitudes relating to patients’ use of health products in Japan
- 218 Downloads
Background There is little information about Japanese pharmacists’ perceived facilitators and barriers to communication with patients about orally taken health products, including herbs and dietary supplements. Objective To explore Japanese pharmacists’ attitudes relating to patients’ use of health products. Method Qualitative study involving focus group interviews with pharmacists was conducted. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method. Setting Focus group interviews with community pharmacists were conducted in Japan. Main outcome measure Pharmacists’ views and experiences about patients’ health product use and their perceived facilitators and barriers to communication. Results Sixteen pharmacists participated and were asked to describe their views and experiences about patients’ health product use. Some were uncomfortable inquiring about and being asked about patients’ health product use, due to lack of scientific evidence for their efficacy and safety, lack of knowledge to advise patients properly, and fear that they could not answer patients’ questions. Other pharmacists had similar views or experiences, but those who were proactive in communicating with patients were motivated by certain predisposing factors, such as their professional responsibility for ensuring patients’ health and safety. Conclusion This study showed that differences in opinion about their roles might create differences in pharmacists’ attitudes toward patients’ health product use. This highlights the importance of reconsidering pharmacists’ roles in community settings. Further studies and debate are needed in order to clarify the pharmacists’ roles and to ensure the design of educational objectives that would enable pharmacists to support their patients in using health products and prescription drugs safely.
KeywordsAlternative medicines Complementary medicines Focus group interview Herbs and dietary supplements Japan Pharmacist Qualitative study
The authors would like to thank the pharmacists who contributed to this study and Fuki Kurimoto for her help as a note taker.
This study was funded by a Grant-in-Aid for Fellows of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21-8567).
Conflicts of interest
- 4.Ministry of Health LaW. Food for specified health uses (FOSHU). 2011. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/topics/foodsafety/fhc/02.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2011.
- 5.Ministry of Health LaW. List of approved FOSHU (in Japanese). 2011. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/bukyoku/iyaku/syoku-anzen/hokenkinou/xls/hyouziseido-1a.xls. Accessed 15 Oct 2011.
- 6.Ministry of Health LaW. Food with nutrient function claims (FNFC). 2011. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/topics/foodsafety/fhc/01.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2011.
- 7.Daiwa Institute of Research. Regulation and market trends concerning health products, New industry report winter 2010 (in Japanese). 2011. http://www.eonet.ne.jp/~selling/report/kenkosyokuhin.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2011.
- 8.Ministry of Health LaW. Annual reports on statistical survey on trends in pharmaceutical production (in Japanese). 2008. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/yakuji/2008/nenpo/index.html. Accessed 15 October 2011.
- 14.Gordon JB. SSRIs and St. John’s wort: possible toxicity? Am Fam Physician. 1998;57(950):3.Google Scholar
- 16.Canter PH, Ernst E. Herbal supplement use by persons aged over 50 years in Britain: frequently used herbs, concomitant use of herbs, nutritional supplements and prescription drugs, rate of informing doctors and potential for negative interactions. Drugs Aging. 2004;21:597–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Asahina Y, Hori S, Ohtani H, Sawada Y. Development and evaluation of an internet-based educational system about herbs and dietary supplements through periodical distribution of information to health professionals (in Japanese with an English summary). Yakugaku Zasshi. 2009;129:773–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Davis D, O’Brien MA, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA. 1999;282:867–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health promotion planning an educational and environmental approach. 2nd ed. Mountain View: Mayfield Publishing Company; 1991.Google Scholar
- 30.Vaughn S, Sinagub JM, Schumm JS. Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996.Google Scholar
- 32.Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2009.Google Scholar
- 33.Maykut P, Morehoues R. Beginning qualitative research: a philosophical and practical guide. London: Falmer Press; 1994.Google Scholar
- 34.Sato I. Method of qualitative data analysis (in Japanese). Tokyo: Shinyo-sha; 2008.Google Scholar
- 35.Brazier AS, Balneaves LG, Seely D, Stephen JE, Suryaprakash N, Taylor-Brown JW. Integrative practices of Canadian oncology health professionals. Curr Oncol. 2008;15 Suppl 2:s110 es87–91.Google Scholar
- 43.Ministry of Health LaW. Statistical survey on medical doctors, dentists and pharmacists (in Japanese). 2008. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/ishi/08/dl/toukei.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2011.