International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 475–480 | Cite as

Physicians and pharmacists: collaboration to improve the quality of prescriptions in primary care in Mexico

  • Dolores Mino-LeónEmail author
  • Hortensia Reyes-Morales
  • Luis Jasso
  • Svetlana Vladislavovna Douvoba
Research Article


Background Inappropriate prescription is a relevant problem in primary health care settings in Mexico, with potentially harmful consequences for patients. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of incorporating a pharmacist into primary care health team to reduce prescription errors for patients with diabetes and/or hypertension. Setting One Family Medicine Clinic from the Mexican Institute of Social Security in Mexico City. Method A “pharmacotherapy intervention” provided by pharmacists through a quasi experimental (before–after) design was carried out. Physicians who allowed access to their diabetes and/or hypertensive patients’ medical records and prescriptions were included in the study. Prescription errors were classified as “filling”, “clinical” or “both”. Descriptive analysis, identification of potential drug–drug interactions (pD–DI), and comparison of the proportion of patients with prescriptions with errors detected “before” and “after” intervention were performed. Main outcome measure Decrease in the proportion of patients who received prescriptions with errors after the intervention. Results Pharmacists detected at least one type of error in 79 out of 160 patients. Errors were “clinical”, “both” and “filling” in 47, 21 and 11 of these patient’s prescriptions respectively. Predominant errors were, in the subgroup of patient’s prescriptions with “clinical” errors, pD–DI; in the subgroup of “both” errors, lack of information on dosing interval and pD–DI; and in the “filling” subgroup, lack of information on dosing interval. The pD–DI caused 50 % of the errors detected, from which 19 % were of major severity. The impact of the correction of errors post-intervention was observed in 19 % of patients who had erroneous prescriptions before the intervention of the pharmacist (49.3–30.3 %, p < 0.05). Conclusion The impact of the intervention was relevant from a clinical point of view for the public health services in Mexico. The implementation of early warning systems of the most widely prescribed drugs is an alternative for reducing prescription errors and consequently the risks they may cause.


Family doctors Intervention Mexico Patient safety Prescription errors 



We wish to thank all patients, the general practitioners and authorities of the participant Family Medicine Clinics at IMSS for their contribution to this study.


This research was supported by a grant of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social through Fondo para el Fomento de la Investigación Médica.

Conflicts of interest



  1. 1.
    Benjamin D. Reducing medication errors and increasing patient safety: case studies in clinical pharmacology. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;43(7):768–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rubin G, George A, Chinn DJ, Richardson C. Errors in general practice: development of an error classification and pilot study of a method for detecting errors. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(6):443–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    White TJ, Araekelian A, Rho JP. Counting the costs of drug-related adverse events. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;15(5):445–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gandhi T, Weingart S, Seger A, Borus J, Burdick E, Poon E, et al. Outpatient prescribing errors and the impact of computerized prescribing. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(9):837–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gandhi T, Weingart S, Borus J, Seger A, Peterson J, Burdick E, et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1556–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Howard RL, Avery A, Howard PD, Partridge M. Investigation into the reasons for preventable drug related admissions to a medical admissions unit: observational study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(4):280–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Harrold LR. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA. 2003;289(9):1107–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Avery AJ, Rodgers S, Cantrill JA, Armstrong S, Elliott R, Howard R, et al. Protocol for the PINCER trial: a cluster randomised trial comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management in general practices. Trials. 2009;10(1):28. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le Grand A, Hogerzeil H, Haaijer-Ruskamp F. Intervention research in rational use of drugs: a review. Health Policy Plan. 1999;14(2):89–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Clapp M, Burdick E, Demonaco H, Erickson J, et al. Pharmacist participation on physician reounds and adverse drug events in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 1999;282(3):267–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kucukarslan SN, Peters M, Mlynarek M, Nafziger D. Pharmacist on reounding teams reduce presentable adverse drug events in hospital general medicine units. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(17):2014–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaboli P, Hoth A, McClimon B, Schnipper L. Clinical pharmacist and inpatient medical care. A systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(9):955–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beney J, Bero L, Bond CM. Expanding the roles of outpatient pharmacists: effects on health services utilisation, costs, and patient outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;3:CD000336.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sellors J, Kaczorowski J, Sellors C. A randomized controlled trial of a pharmacist consultation program for family physicians and their elderly patients. CMAJ. 2003;169(1):17–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mino-León D, Reyes-Morales H, Galván-Plata ME, Ponce-Monter H, Palma JA, Amato D, Figueras A. Drug treatment of hypertension: compliance and adverse reactions in a cohort of hypertensive patients in a primary care setting. Rev Invest Clin. 2007;59(1):8–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Castro-Ríos A, Reyes-Morales H, Pérez-Cuevas R. An evaluation of a continuing medical education program for primary care services in the hypoglycaemic agent’s prescription in diabetes mellitus type 2. Salud Publica Mex. 2008;50(suppl 4):s445–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Klasco RK, editor. DRUG-REAX® System [computer program on DVD]. Greenwood Village (Co): Thomson MICROMEDEX; 2006. 5 CD-ROM: color 4.5 in.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parfitt K. Martindale: the complete drug reference. 32nd ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 1999. p. 2315.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Altavela J, Jones M, Ritter M. A prospective trial of a clinical pharmacy intervention in a primary care practice in a capitated payment system. J Manag Care Pharm. 2008;14(9):831–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meyer TA. Improving the quality of the order-writing process for inpatient orders and outpatient prescriptions. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2000;57(suppl 4):s18–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shaughnessy AF, Nickel RO. Prescription-writing patterns and errors in family residency program. J Fam Pract. 1989;29(3):290–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Svarstad BL, Kotchen JM, Shireman TI, Crawford SY, Palmer PA, Vivian EM, et al. The team education and adherence monitoring (TEAM) trial: pharmacy interventions to improve hypertension control in blacks. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(3):264–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tamblyn R, Berkson L, Dauphinee WD, Gayton D, Grad R, Huang A, et al. Unnecessary prescribing of NSAIDs and the management of NSAID-related gastropathy in medical practice. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(6):429–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Glazier RH, Dalby DM, Badley EM, Hawker GA, Bell MJ, Buchbinder R, et al. Management of common musculoskeletal problems: a survey of Ontario primary care physicians. CMAJ. 1998;158(8):1037–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dolores Mino-León
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hortensia Reyes-Morales
    • 2
  • Luis Jasso
    • 3
  • Svetlana Vladislavovna Douvoba
    • 4
  1. 1.Instituto de Geriatría, Secretaría de SaludMéxico, D.F.México
  2. 2.Dirección de Determinantes y Retos de los Sistemas de Salud, Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de SaludInstituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaCuernavacaMéxico
  3. 3.Hospital Infantil de México, Secretaría de SaludMéxico, D.F.Mexico
  4. 4.Unidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y en Servicios de SaludInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialMéxico, D.F.México

Personalised recommendations