Appropriateness of ambulatory prescriptions in Taiwan: translating claims data into initiatives
- 234 Downloads
Background Appropriate prescribing is fundamental to successful pharmacotherapy. The status of current ambulatory medication practices in medicine and pharmacy would be better understood through an analysis of community pharmacy prescription claims. Objective The aims of the study were to investigate patterns of the types of prescriptions claimed by community pharmacies, undetected prescription errors by community pharmacists, and associated factors of prescription errors. Setting A population-based claims database of prescriptions dispensed by community pharmacies in Taiwan. Methods Ambulatory prescriptions were randomly sampled and reassessed for prescribing appropriateness by medical center pharmacists using explicit criteria. Demographics of patients, physicians, care facilities, and prescription/dispensing details were assessed and used to identify associated factors for prescription errors using descriptive analyses as well as logistic regression. Main outcome measures Erroneous prescriptions prescribed by physicians, and dispensed and claimed through community pharmacies. Results The study included analyses of 3065 prescriptions dispensed in community pharmacies resulting from 1003 patient visits, mostly to physician or dental clinics (99.5%). Prescribing characteristics, patterns, and examples of prescription errors are described. Prescription errors were identified in 18.3% (n = 560) of prescriptions and 34.9% (n = 350) of patient visits. Potential prescribing errors included errors of omission (25.5%), errors of commission (53.4%), and others (21.1%). The top three errors were incorrect dosage (27.5%), missing indication (23.6%), and insufficient or unavailable drug information (18.9%). Drugs most frequently associated with prescription errors included antihistamines, hormones, and gastrointestinal agents. Prescription were also higher in the central and eastern regions of Taiwan. Pediatricians accounted for a disproportionate number of prescription errors. Conclusion Prescription errors are prevalent in ambulatory care in Taiwan, and differential practice standards exist between community and hospital services. This disparity needs to be reconciled by pertinent initiatives to enhance community-hospital and pharmacist-general practitioner communication and interprofessional educational efforts to improve medication use and safety.
KeywordsCommunity pharmacy Dispensing Medication reconciliation National Health Insurance Prescription appropriateness Taiwan
The authors would like to acknowledge Chia-Chi Cheng, MS and Chi-Ju Yang, BSPharm, MSCP for their helpful assistance in claims data processing.
This study was supported by a research grant (DOH 97-TD-D-113-97014) from the Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Taiwan, ROC.
Conflicts of Interest
- 1.Cowen DL, Helfand WH. Ancient antecedents. In: Pharmacy: an illustrated history. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc., 1988. pp 17–25. ISBN:0-8109-1498-0.Google Scholar
- 2.Tone A, Watkins ES, editors. Medicating modern America: prescription drugs in history. New York: New York University Press; 2007. ISBN:978-0-8147-8301-6.Google Scholar
- 3.US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. FastStats: therapeutic drug use. 2010. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/drugs.htm. Accessed 02 Aug 2010 (Last updated: 18 Jan 2010).
- 4.Ho Y-F, Lai Y-H, Lin F-J, Gau M-H, Chen M-T, Chen C-H, et al. An innovative model for releasing outpatient prescriptions from a community hospital. Formosan J Med. 2003;7:326–36. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- 5.Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Institute of medicine: committee on quality of health care in America. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. ISBN:0-3090-6837-1.Google Scholar
- 11.van Doormaal JE, van den Bemt PMLA, Mol PGM, Zaal RJ, Egberts ACG, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, et al. Medication errors: the impact of prescribing and transcribing errors on preventable harm in hospitalised patients. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:22–7.Google Scholar
- 12.Ho Y-F, Wu R-S, Wu F-L L, Yang H-Y, Suen M-P, Chen W-H, et al. Establishment of a web-based pharmacy reporting system for in-patient prescribing errors. Formosan J Med. 2005;9:439–47 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- 13.Pearson A, Aromataris E. Patient safety in primary healthcare: a review of the literature. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care/The Joanna Briggs Institute. 2009. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/safety/publishing.nsf/Content/com-pubs_PrimaryCare-con/$File/26889-Literature-Review.PDF. Accessed 04 Aug 2010.
- 26.Department of Health. The separation of dispensing practice from medical practice starting from Taipei and Kaoshiung by March 1, 1997 (in Chinese). DOH, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. Document no. (DOH) 86007782; 1 Feb 1997; 1997.Google Scholar
- 27.Tung C-Y, Wu F-L L, Lin C-C, Lin S-J, Ho Y-F. The public’s perception towards chronic-illness refill prescriptions: community versus hospital refill services. Formosan J Med. 2008;12:635–43. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- 28.National Health Insurance Research Databases. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.nhri.org.tw/nhird/date_01.htm. Accessed 1 Dec 2010.
- 29.Department of Health. Statistical information (in Chinese). DOH, Executive Yuan, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. 2010. Available at: http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DM/DM2_2.aspx?now_fod_list_no=10238&class_no=440&level_no=1. Accessed 15 Dec 2010.
- 30.Department of Health. Health Statistics in Taiwan 2006. DOH, Executive Yuan, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. 2010. Available at: http://www.doh.gov.tw/ufile/doc/HSIT.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2010.
- 31.WHO. International classification of diseases, ninth revision, clinical modification (ICD-9-CM). ISBN:1-5706-6317-3.Google Scholar
- 32.Taiwan Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation. 2010. Available at: http://www.tjcha.org.tw/FrontStage/aboutus_en.html. Accessed 30 Dec 2010.
- 34.Micromedex Computerized Clinical Information System. Thomson Reuters (Healthcare) Inc.; 2008.Google Scholar
- 35.Drug facts and comparisons. Facts and comparisons. 61th ed. St. Louis (MO); 2007. ISBN:978-1-57439-256-2.Google Scholar
- 36.Wang C-K, editor. Formosa drug references, vol I & II. Taipei: Ching-Kang Foundation for Pharmacy Promotion; 1996. ISBN:9-5799-1180-0.Google Scholar
- 37.Chen C-F, Hsu K-Y, Tsai Y-C, editors. Taiwan drugs reference: ethical drugs. 2nd ed. Taipei: Taipei Pharmacists Association; 2000. ISBN:9-5799-8191-4.Google Scholar
- 38.Chen C-A. Therapeutic handbook of common drugs. 37th ed. Taipei: Drug Year Book Magazine Ltd; 2007. ISBN:9-5728-6539-0.Google Scholar
- 39.Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI). Pharmaceuticals reimbursed by the NHI. BNHI, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. 2008. Available at: http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=21&menu_id=713&WD_ID=713&webdata_id=873. Accessed 01 July 2008.
- 40.Taketomo CK, Hodding JH, Kraus DM. Pediatric dosage handbook with international trade names index. 15th ed. Hudson, OH: Lexi-Comp; 2008–2009. ISBN:978-1-59195-240-4.Google Scholar
- 41.Department of Pediatrics. Growth charts. National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. 2008. Available at: http://www.ntuh.gov.tw/ped/default.aspx. Accessed 01 July 2008.
- 43.Huang S-H, Lin H-N, Wu F-L L, Ho Y-F. Evaluation of pharmacist’s participation in the detection of drug–drug interactions. Formosan J Med. 2003;7:166–73 (Chinese).Google Scholar
- 44.Chen L-J, Lin W-C, Lee S-J, Hsieh L-L, Lu PY, Wang S-F, et al. An analysis on the formats and contents of ambulatory prescriptions. Formosan J Med. 2009;13:449–60 (Chinese).Google Scholar