Pharmaceutical interventions on prescription problems in a Danish pharmacy setting
- 279 Downloads
Background International studies regarding pharmacists’ interventions towards prescription problems produce highly variable results. The only peer-reviewed study in a Danish setting estimated an intervention rate of 2.3 per 1,000 prescriptions. With the introduction of a new tool for registration, we hypothesized that a better estimate could be obtained. Objective We aimed to produce an up-to-date estimate of the extent and type of pharmacists’ interventions towards prescription problems in a Danish pharmacy setting Setting The study was conducted at Copenhagen Sønderbro Pharmacy, a large urban 24-hour pharmacy. Method Data were collected prospectively through an electronic form. All interventions were primarily classified as either clinical or administrative in nature, and further classified in a number of pre-determined subcategories. Furthermore, information about age, sex, time of day, the wording of the prescription, the performed intervention, the person performing the intervention and the type of prescriber were recorded. All entries were manually validated by a study pharmacist. Main outcome measure The intervention rate, given as the number of interventions per 1,000 prescriptions. Results We found 599 validated interventions. Thirty-two percent of the interventions were clinical and 68% administrative by nature. Fifty-one percent of the administrative and 35% of the clinical interventions were regarding antibiotics. In the study period, a total of 55,522 prescriptions were filled out together with 3,069 dose-dispensing packages, giving a rate of 10.2 (9.4–11.1) interventions per 1,000 prescriptions. Conclusion We found an intervention rate substantially higher than reported in previous Danish studies.
KeywordsClinical pharmacy Denmark Pharmacy practice Primary care Problem prescriptions Pharmacists’ interventions
The authors wish to acknowledge the staff at Sønderbro Pharmacy for the effort of performing the registrations. Furthermore, our thanks go to Mikkel Nørreslet and Charlotte Vermehren for valuable comments on the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
- 21.Thomsen MH, Kristoffersen LB, Kjær-Hansen B, Hellebek T. Analyse af receptkorrektioner på apotek. Association of Danish Pharmacies; Published in 2008.Google Scholar
- 22.Hansen BK, Mortensen AR. Analyse på receptkorrektioner på apotek 2006 (in Danish). Association of Danish Pharmacies; Published in 2006.Google Scholar
- 23.WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2011. Oslo; 2010.Google Scholar
- 24.Receptbekendtgørelsen §27–28; [Last updated 2007]. Available from: https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=11345.
- 27.Knudsen P, Herborg H, Knudsen MS, Mortensen AR, Hellebek A. Apotekets forebyggelse af fejl [The prevention of errors by the pharmacy]. Association of Danish Pharmacies, Pharmakon and Danish Society for Patient Safety; Published in 2005. ISBN: 87-88873-83-8.Google Scholar
- 28.Danish Medicines Agency. Undersøgelse over apotekernes driftsforhold for 2009 [Examination of the pharmacies operational conditions for 2009]. Published in 2010. ISSN: 1602-4532. Available from: http://laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/~/media/6B644D1C0D5A4B399BD08B32B6E6A985.ashx.
- 33.Cherici C, Frazier J, Feldman M, Gordon B, Petrykiw C, Russel W, et al. White Paper: Navigating Drug Shortages in American Healthcare: a premier healthcare alliance analysis. Published in 2011. Available from: http://www.premierinc.com/about/news/11-mar/drug-shortage-white-paper-3-28-11.pdf.