Advertisement

Identification and physicians’ views of their commonly-used drug information sources in Singapore

  • Hui-Ling Lua
  • Grant Sklar
  • Yu KoEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Aim To examine physicians’ use and views of various sources for general drug information and to determine the kind of drug-related questions they receive. Method An online survey of general practitioners who were Singapore Medical Association members was conducted. The survey consisted of questions about the physicians’ demographics, the drug information source they used most often, their opinions on the information from that source, and the types of drug-related questions they received from patients. Results Among the 236 physicians who responded to the survey, 58.1% used reference texts most frequently; of these respondents, 80.3% used the Monthly Index of Medical Specialties. Only 4.2% most often go to pharmacists for drug information. Of the 75 (31.8%) respondents who chose online sources, about half used Google while the remainder used specific websites. Most respondents rated drug information from reference texts as somewhat comprehensive (71.5%) and usually reliable (81.8%). The choice of drug information sources was associated with physicians’ age, place of practice, access to the Internet, and clinical experience (P < 0.05). The types of drug-related questions that physicians most frequently received were with regards to adverse drug reactions (76.3%), drug costs (36.4%), and drug use during pregnancy or lactation (34.3%). Conclusion Most physicians in Singapore search for general drug information using reference texts and consider them to be comprehensive and reliable. Questions pertaining to adverse drug reactions were the drug-related questions physicians most frequently receive. It is important for physicians to have appropriate drug information references and learn methods with which to verify the credibility of drug information obtained from the Internet. Pharmacists can also work to improve their role as providers of drug information.

Keywords

Attitude of health personnel Drug information General practitioners Singapore Survey 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the physicians who responded to the survey and the Singapore Medical Association for distributing the survey.

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Tajir GK, Kelly WN. Epidemiology, comparative methods of detection, and preventability of adverse drug events. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:1169–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 1999. ISBN:0309068371.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Phillips DP, Christenfeld N, Glynn LM. Increase in US medication-error deaths between 1983 and 1993. Lancet. 1998;351:643–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    von Laue NC, Schwappach DL, Koeck CM. The epidemiology of preventable adverse drug events: a review of the literature. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2003;115:407–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singapore Medical Council annual report 2008. Singapore: Singapore Medical Council, 2008. http://www.smc.gov.sg/html/MungoBlobs/515/148/SMC%20Annual%20Report%202008%20(Final%20Printed%20Version).pdf. (Accessed December 2010).
  6. 6.
    Vidal L, Shavit M, Fraser A, Paul M, Leibovici L. Systematic comparison of four sources of drug information regarding adjustment of dose for renal function. BMJ. 2005;331:263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abarca J, Malone DC, Armstrong EP, et al. Concordance of severity ratings provided in four drug interaction compendia. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2004;44:136–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vitry AI. Comparative assessment of four drug interaction compendia. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63:709–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fulda TR, Valuck RJ, Zanden JV. Disagreement among drug compendia on inclusion and ratings of drug–drug interactions. Curr Ther Res. 2000;61:540–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hatfield CL, May SK, Markoff JS. Quality of consumer drug information provided by four web sites. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56:2308–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Franke L, Avery AJ, Groom L, Horsfield P. Is there a role for computerized decision support for drug dosing in general practice? A questionnaire survey. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2000;25:373–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hull FM, Marshall T. Sources of information about new drugs and attitudes towards drug prescribing: an international study of differences between primary care physicians. Fam Pract. 1987;4:123–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McGettigan P, Golden J, Fryer J, Chan R, Feely J. Prescribers prefer people: the sources of information used by doctors for prescribing suggest that the medium is more important than the message. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;51:184–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peay MY, Peay ER. Differences among practitioners in patterns of preference for information sources in the adoption of new drugs. Soc Sci Med. 1984;18:1019–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peay MY, Peay ER. Patterns of preference for information sources in the adoption of new drugs by specialists. Soc Sci Med. 1990;31:467–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Layton MR, Sritanyarat W, Chadbunchachai S, Wertheimer AI. Sources of information for new drugs among physicians in Thailand. Pharm World Sci. 2007;29:619–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ponampalam R, Anantharaman V. The need for drug and poison information—the Singapore physicians’ perspective. Singapore Med J. 2003;44:231–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bennett NL, Casebeer LL, Kristofco R, Collins BC. Family physicians’ information seeking behaviors: a survey comparison with other specialties. BioMed Central. 2005;5:1–5.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wong PSJ, Ko Y, Sklar GE. A survey of pharmacists in Singapore to identify and evaluate commonly-used drug information sources. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:347–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Monthly Index of Medical Specialties (MIMS) Singapore. http://www.mims.com.sg. (Accessed 2011 Feb 12).
  21. 21.
    Ho CH, Ko Y, Tan ML. Patient needs and sources of drug information in Singapore: is the internet replacing former sources? Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:732–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    URAC’s Health Web Site and Health Content Vendor Accreditation Programs. http://www.urac.org/programs/prog_accred_HWS_po.aspx. (Accessed 2010 Dec 12).
  23. 23.
    HON Code of Conduct (HONcode) for medical and health Web sites.www.hon.ch/HONcode. (Accessed 2010 Dec 12).
  24. 24.
    List of registered medical practitioners for 2007. Supplement to the Republic of Singapore Government Gazette. Singapore National Printers Corporation Ltd (SNP), 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Changi General HospitalSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of ScienceNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Department of PharmacyNational University HospitalSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations