Satisfaction predictors and attitudes towards electronic prescribing systems in three UK hospitals
- 330 Downloads
Objective Measuring satisfaction of technology users, along with satisfaction determinants, is important to enhance system utilisation and identify potential problems. The aim of this study was to investigate pharmacists’ and doctors’ attitudes towards e-prescribing systems, and assess the predictors of their satisfaction. Method A cross-sectional survey was conducted, with 67 pharmacists and 335 doctors in three English hospitals completing a pre-piloted, postal questionnaire. Results The majority of pharmacists and doctors agreed that their e-prescribing system improved the efficiency of prescribing, and reduced dosage regimen errors. However, the majority did not believe that the system created more time for near-patient clinical activities, or sped up patient discharge. More pharmacists than doctors believed that the system improved the quality of patient care. Doctors were more likely to perceive that the e-prescribing system reduced formulation and omission errors. Doctors and pharmacists from the same hospital had similar opinions about the strengths and weaknesses of the e-prescribing system. Nine variables (out of 29 potential independent variables), seven of which were related to e-prescribing system efficiency, were significant predictors of user satisfaction. Conclusion Overall, respondents were satisfied with the systems; however, pharmacists were generally more satisfied than doctors. The number of satisfaction predictors related to the feelings about e-prescribing system efficiency was larger than those predictors related to the quality of patient care. Implications for practice These findings contribute to better understanding of how pharmacists and doctors perceive e-prescribing systems, and also have implications for system development, training, and how an e-prescribing system can be most effectively ‘marketed’ to different user groups.
KeywordsAttitude CPOE Doctor E-prescribing system Pharmacist Physician Satisfaction United Kingdom
We like to thank the healthcare professionals in all three hospitals for their support and participation in this study.
This study was financially supported by the Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences and School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences in the University of Manchester as part of Derar Abdel-Qader’s PhD studentship.
Conflicts of interest
- 1.Teich JM, Hurley JF, Beckley RF, Aranow M. Design of an easy-to-use physician order entry system with support for nursing and ancillary departments. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992;16:99–103.Google Scholar
- 3.Chin HL, Wallace P. Embedding guidelines into direct physician order entry: simple methods, powerful results. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999;1999:221–5.Google Scholar
- 7.NHS Connecting for Health (NHS CFH). Electronic prescribing in hospitals—challenges and lessons learned. Report commissioned by NHS Connecting for Health (NHS CFH), Leeds. 2009.Google Scholar
- 11.Miller RA, Gardner RM. Recommendations for responsible monitoring and regulation of clinical software systems. American medical informatics association, computer-based patient record institute, medical library association, association of academic health science libraries, American health information management association, American nurses association. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(6):442–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Ravnan MC, Ravnan SL, Manzo BA. Physician attitudes toward computerized medication order entry. ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting, vol. 36(Dec). 2001. p. 385E.Google Scholar
- 19.Shek C, Sittig DF, Kuperman GJ, Fanikos J, Seger DL. Pharmacists’ satisfaction with a physician order entry (POE) system. ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting, vol. 34(Dec). 1999. p. 28R.Google Scholar
- 20.Snyder R, Fields W. Community hospital physician adoption of a CPOE system: perceptions of readiness, usefulness, and satisfaction. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceeding. 2007. p. 1117.Google Scholar
- 21.Wess ML, Hegner C, Anderson PF, Thelen G, Embi PJ, Besier JL et al. Effect of a computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system on provider and nurse satisfaction at a community hospital and university hospital. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceeding. 2007. p. 1152.Google Scholar
- 24.Goundrey-Smith SJ. Electronic prescribing-experience in the UK and system design issues. Pharm J. 2006;277:485–9.Google Scholar
- 25.Andrews F, Withey S. Social indicators of well-being: American perceptions of life quality. New York: Putnam Press; 1976.Google Scholar
- 30.Bates DW, Boyle DL, Teich JM. Impact of computerized physician order entry on physician time. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994; 996.Google Scholar
- 33.Sviokla JJ. Managing a transformational technology: a field study of the introduction of profiling. Harvard business school working paper #93-059, (in press) 1995, (Available in: Implementing radical change: gradual versus rapid pace. Gallivan M. et al. 1994). http://www.archive.org/stream/implementingradi00gall/implementingradi00gall_djvu.txt. Accessed 10 Mar 2010.