Advertisement

Pharmacy World & Science

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 464–471 | Cite as

Applicability of the REALM health literacy test to an English second-language South African population

  • Ros DowseEmail author
  • Lebo Lecoko
  • Martina S. Ehlers
Research Article

Abstract

Objective and setting To investigate health literacy in an English second language population using the REALM test, to evaluate its appropriateness and to compare health literacy between four different education categories. Setting Primary healthcare clinics and participant homes in Grahamstown, South Africa. Method The REALM test, a US-developed test, was administered via an interpreter to 125 Xhosa-speaking, English second language participants from a range of educational backgrounds. Participants were asked to read all 66 words (three lists of 22 words each), and pronunciation was assessed. In a deviation from the standard method, an explanation for each word was requested to evaluate comprehension. Results were classified into four categories: adequately pronounced and comprehended; neither adequately pronounced nor comprehended; adequately pronounced but not comprehended; not adequately pronounced but comprehended. The first two categories were rated as “applicable”. The percentage of “applicable” cases of the total of 8250 cases (125 participants; 66 words each) was calculated. The association between education and both pronunciation and comprehension was investigated using chi-square tests, with a significance level of P < 0.05. Main outcome measures: Average grade-equivalent reading level; number of words adequately pronounced and comprehended; applicability of the REALM to individual words. Results Average grade-equivalent reading level of the study population according to the REALM test was grade 7–8. An average of 46 of 66 words were adequately pronounced, whereas less than half this number (20) were adequately comprehended. Comprehension ability was 57% lower than the ability to adequately pronounce the words, a finding that highlights the inability of pronunciation data to predict comprehension of a health-related text. Examples of poor comprehension include antibiotics (16.0%), fatigue (6.4%), nausea (8.0%), anaemia (2.4%), osteoporosis (0.8%), hepatitis (0.8%), haemorrhoids (0%), impetigo (0%) and colitis (0%). Both pronunciation (P = 0.016) and comprehension (P = 0.001) were significantly influenced by education. Applicability of the REALM to individual words ranged from 20.8 to 96.0%, with an average of 59.1%. Given that the REALM was deemed inapplicable for an average of four out of every 10 words, it appears to be unsuitable for use in its current form for assessing health literacy of the study population.

Keywords

Comprehension Health literacy Literacy Measurement Reading level Second-language South Africa 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Grateful thanks to Professor Sarah Radloff for her help with the statistical analysis, and to our participants and interpreter for their enthusiastic participation in and contribution to the project.

Funding

Financial support for the study was received from Rhodes University, Grahamstown.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References

  1. 1.
    General Assembly of the United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. December 10, 1948. http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/. Accessed 1 Dec 2009.
  2. 2.
    UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Regional literacy rates for youths (15–24) and adults (15+). May 2009 release. http://stats.uis.unesco.org/unesco/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=201. Accessed 1 Dec 2009.
  3. 3.
    National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Adult literacy. A first look at the literacy of America’s adults in the 21st Century. 2005. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics Publication No. 2006470. http://nces.ed.gov/Pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006470. Accessed 22 Feb 2010.
  4. 4.
    Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA, editors. Health Literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004. ISBN 0309529263.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    World Health Organization (WHO). Health Promotion Glossary. WHO/HPR/HEP/98.1. 1998. Geneva. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1998/WHO_HPR_HEP_98.1.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2010.
  6. 6.
    Williams MV, Baker DW, Parker RM, Nurss JR. Relationship of functional health literacy to patients’ knowledge of their chronic disease. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:166–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kalichman SC, Rompa D. Functional health literacy is associated with health status and health-related knowledge in people living with HIV-AIDS. JAIDS. 2000;25:337–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gazmararian JA, Williams MV, Peel J, Baker DW. Health literacy and knowledge of disease state. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;51:267–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andrus MR, Roth MT. Health literacy: a review. Pharmacotherapy. 2002;22:282–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis TC, Arnold C, Berkel HJ, Nandy I, Jackson RH, Glass J. Knowledge and attitude on screening mammography among low-literate, low-income women. Cancer. 1996;78:1912–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, Clark WS. Health literacy and the risk of hospital admission. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:791–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eichler K, Wieser S, Brügger. The costs of limited health literacy: a systematic review. Int J Public Health 2009;54:313–24.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J, Wang F, Osmond D, Daher C, et al. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA. 2002;288:475–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DeWalt DA, Berkman ND, Sheridan S, Lohr KN, Pignone M. Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1228–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davis TC, Wolf MS, Bass PF III, Thompson JA, Tilson HH, Neuberger M, et al. Literacy and misunderstanding prescription drug labels. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:887–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miller LG, Liu H, Hays RD, Golin CE, Ye Z, Beck CK, et al. Knowledge of antiretroviral regimen dosing and adherence: a longitudinal study. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:514–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kripalani S, Henderson LE, Ellen MS, Chiu BA, Robertson R, Kolm P, et al. Predictors of medication self-management skills in a low-literacy population. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:852–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Youmans SL, Schillinger D. Functional health literacy and medication use: the pharmacist’s role. Ann Pharmacother. 2003;37:1726–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sleath BL, Jackson E, Thomas KC, Galloway J, Dumain L, Thorpe J, et al. Literacy and perceived barriers to medication taking among homeless mothers and their children. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006;63:346–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wolf MS, Davis TC, Osborn CY, Skripkauskas S, Bennett CJ, Makoul G. Literacy, self-efficacy, and HIV medication adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65:253–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kalichman SC, Ramachandran B, Catz S. Adherence to combination antiretroviral therapies in HIV patients of low health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:267–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Golin CE, Liu H, Hays RD, Miller LG, Beck CK, Ickovics J, et al. A prospective study of predictors of adherence to combination antiretroviral medication. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:756–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Paasche-Orlow MK, Cheng DM, Palepu A, Meli S, Faber V, Samet JH. Health literacy, antiretroviral adherence and HIV-RNA suppression. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:835–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parikh NS, Parker RM, Nurss JR, Baler DW, Williams MV. Shame and health literacy: the unspoken connection. Patient Educ Couns. 1996;27:33–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beard, Keith. “Wide Range Achievement Test.” Gale Encyclopedia of Mental Disorders. 2003. http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3405700410.html. Accessed 22 Feb 2010.
  26. 26.
    Parker RM, Baker DW, Williams MV, Nurss JR. The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients’ literacy skills. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:537–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hanson-Divers EC. Developing a medical achievement reading test to evaluate patient literacy skills: a preliminary study. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1997;8:56–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baker DW, Williams MV, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, Nurss J. Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;38:33–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux EJ, George RB, Murphy PW, et al. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med. 1993;25:391–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Slosson RJL. Slosson oral reading test—revised. East Aurora. New York: Slosson Educational Publications, Inc; 1990.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Weiss BD, Mays MZ, Martz W, Merriam Castro K, De Walt DA, et al. Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: The newest vital sign. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:514–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Census 2001: Census in brief/Statistics South Africa. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa, 2003. http://www.statssa.gov.za/census01/HTML/CInBrief/CIB2001.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2009.
  33. 33.
    Schillinger D, Bindman A, Wang F, Stewart A, Piette J. Functional health literacy and the quality of physician-patient communication among diabetes patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;52:315–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Calderón JL, Beltrán RA. Pitfalls in health communication: healthcare policy, institution, structure and process. Medscape Gen Med 2004;6:1–6. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/466016. Accessed 7 Dec 2009.
  35. 35.
    Davis TC, Michielutte R, Askov EN, Williams MV, Weiss BD. Practical assessment of adult literacy in health care. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25:613–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nurss JR, Baker DW, Davis TC, Parker RM, Williams MV. Difficulties in functional health literacy screening in Spanish-speaking adults. J Reading. 1995;38:632–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of PharmacyRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations