Prescribing errors in patients with documented drug allergies: comparison of ICD-10 coding and written patient notes
- 412 Downloads
Introduction: Allergies to drugs are a major cause for hospitalisation and inappropriate prescriptions to patients. However, allergies can be prevented if the patient’s history of drug allergy is known and coded. Objective of the study: Assessment of the value of the widely used ICD-10 codes for drug-allergies (e.g. Z88, L27) as triggers for decision support in an electronic prescription system and evaluation of the potential impact of such an alert system. We also evaluated the usefulness of manual drug allergy notes recorded in patients’ charts in the prevention of prescribing errors due to drug allergies. Setting: University hospital providing primary and tertiary care. Methods: Using Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification codes we allocated to drug specifying ICD-10 codes (i.e. Z88) all drugs belonging to the same group of compounds or those known to induce cross-allergy. In a randomly selected cohort of 200 in-patients we then assessed documentation and coding of drug allergies and incident prescribing errors ignoring patients’ drug allergies. Results: Eighteen of the 200 patients had an allergy-related ICD code in the chart, 51 had a written note, and 13 had both. About 21% of patients with documented drug allergies were prescribed a drug potentially triggering the allergy. There was no difference in prescribing errors due to drugs potentially inducing allergies when the allergy was only documented as an ICD-10 code or the information was available in the paper record (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The findings of this study emphasise the necessity of a more precise and efficient documentation system of drug allergies along with the implementation of an electronic CDS for drug allergies that makes physicians aware of patients’ drug allergies during the prescribing process.
KeywordsClinical decision support systems Drug allergy Germany Medical order entry systems Medication errors
A. Benkhaial’s work was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Libya.
Conflicts of interest
- 1.Johansson SG, Bieber T, Dahl R, Friedmann PS, Lanier BQ, Lockey RF, et al. Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: report of the nomenclature review committee of the world allergy organization, October 2003. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113:832–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.12.591.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Brunton LL, Lazo JS, editors. Goodman and Gilman’s: the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2006. ISBN: 0-07-142280-3.Google Scholar
- 14.Medline. Medical Subject Headings of the U.S national library of medicine. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=mesh. Accessed January 26, 2009.
- 30.Random sequence generator. Available at: http://www.random.org/sequences/. Accessed 26 Jan 2009.
- 43.Adkinson NF Jr. Drug allergy. In: Adkinson NF Jr., Bochner BS, editors. Middleton’s allergy principles and practice. vol. II, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2003. pp. 1679–94. ISBN: 0-323-01425-9.Google Scholar
- 44.Yates AB, deShazo RD. Drug allergies and hypersensitivity. In: Rich RR, Fleisher TA, editors. Clinical immunology: principles & practice. 2nd ed. London: Mosby; 2001. Pp. 54.1–15. ISBN: 0 7234 3161 2.Google Scholar