Objective To determine the rate and the primary types of medication dispensing errors detected by pharmacists during implementation of a unit dose drug dispensing system. Setting The central pharmacy at the Percy French military hospital (France). Method The check of the unit dose medication cassettes was performed by pharmacists to identify dispensing errors before delivering to the care units. From April 2006 to December 2006, detected errors were corrected and recorded into seven categories: unauthorized drug, wrong dosage-form, improper dose, omission, wrong time, deteriorated drug, and wrong patient errors. Main outcome measure Dispensing error rate, calculated by dividing the total of detected errors by the total of filled and omitted doses; classification of recorded dispensing errors. Results During the study, 9,719 unit dose medication cassettes were filled by pharmacy technicians. Pharmacists detected 706 errors for a total of 88,609 filled and omitted unit doses. An overall error rate of 0.80% was found. There were approximately 0.07 detected dispensing errors per medication cassette. The most common error types were improper dose errors (n = 265, 37.5%) and omission errors (n = 186, 26.3%). Many causes may probably explain the occurrence of dispensing errors, including communication failures, problems related to drug labeling or packaging, distractions, interruptions, heavy workload, and difficulties in reading handwriting prescriptions. Conclusion The results showed that a wide range of errors occurred during the dispensing process. A check performed after the initial medication selection is also necessary to detect and correct dispensing errors. In order to decrease the occurrence of dispensing errors, some practical measures have been implemented in the central pharmacy. But because some dispensing errors may remain undetected, there is a requirement to develop other strategies that reduce or eliminate these errors. The pharmacy staff is widely involved in this duty.
Dispensing error France Hospital pharmacy Medication error Military hospital Unit dose dispensing
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors wish to acknowledge all the pharmacy technicians who took part in this study.
No financial support was received.
Conflict of interests
No conflict of interests to declare.
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press; 2000.Google Scholar
Parker PF. Drug distribution in hospitals. Unit-dose systems reduce error, increase efficiency. Hospitals. 1968;42:65–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
McConnell WE, Barker KN, Garrity LF. Dispensing: report of a study. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1961;18:531–41.Google Scholar
Lepinski PW, Thielke TS, Collins DM, Hanson A. Cost comparison of unit dose and traditional drug distribution in a long-term-care facility. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986;43:2771–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Fontan JE, Maneglier V, Nguyen VX, Loirat C, Brion F. Medication errors in hospitals: computerized unit dose drug dispensing system versus ward stock distribution system. Pharm World Sci. 2003;25:112–7. doi:10.1023/A:1024053514359.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Arnaud L, Coyral D, Dufauret C, Fernandez B, Vergne-Salle P, Bonnet C, et al. A propos d’une expérience d’organisation de dispensation journalière individuelle nominative (DJIN). Actualités pharmaceutiques hospitalières. 2005;1:37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassal TH, Daniels CE. Evaluation of three types of control chart methods in unit dose error monitoring. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1983;40:970–5.Google Scholar
Taylor J, Gaucher M. Medication selection errors made by pharmacy technicians in filling unit dose orders. Can J Hosp Pharm. 1986;39:9–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Klein EG, Santora JA, Pascale PM, Kitrenos JG. Medication cart-filling time accuracy, and cost with an automated dispensing system. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994;51:1193–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Cina JL, Gandhi TK, Churchill W, Fanikos J, McCrea M, Mitton P, et al. How many hospital pharmacy medication dispensing errors go undetected? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:73–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
American society of hospital pharmacists. ASHP guidelines on preventing medication errors in hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1993;50:305–14.Google Scholar
Becker MD, Johnson MH, Longe RL. Errors remaining in unit dose carts after checking by pharmacists versus pharmacy technicians. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1978;35:432–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Woller TW, Stuart J, Vrabel R, Senst B. Checking of unit dose cassettes by pharmacy technicians at three Minnesota hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991;48:1952–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ness JE, Sullivan SD, Stergachis A. Accuracy of technicians and pharmacists in identifying dispensing errors. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994;51:354–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Spooner SH, Emerson PK. Using hospital pharmacy technicians to check unit dose carts. Hosp Pharm. 1994;29:433–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ambrose PJ, Saya FG, Lovett LT, Tan S, Adams DW, Shane R. Evaluating the accuracy of technicians and pharmacists in checking unit dose medication cassettes. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002;59:1183–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Scarsi KK, Fotis MA, Noskin GA. Pharmacist participation in medical rounds reduces medication errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002;59:2089–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Weant KA, Cook AM, Armitstead JA. Medication-error reporting and pharmacy resident experience during implementation of computerized prescriber order entry. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64:526–30. doi:10.2146/ajhp060001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Poon EG, Cina JL, Churchill W, Patel N, Featherstone E, Rothschild JM, et al. Medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events before and after implementing bar code technology in the pharmacy. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:426–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Flynn EA, Barker KN, Pepper GA, Bates DW, Mikeal RL. Comparison of methods for detecting medication errors in 36 hospitals and skilled-nursing facilities. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002;59:436–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar