Impact of postal and telephone reminders on pick-up rates of unclaimed e-prescriptions
- 149 Downloads
Objective: To investigate the impact of a reminder (i.e., a mailed letter or short telephone call) from the pharmacy to patients, compared with no reminder in a control group, on the pick-up rates of unclaimed e-prescriptions. Method: Patients, with e-prescriptions transmitted to four large community pharmacies in two counties in northern Sweden and remaining unclaimed after 4 weekdays, were randomised to one of two intervention groups (a mailed reminder or a short telephonic reminder) or a control group. Main outcome measures: Rates of patients’ pick-up of their e-prescriptions at follow-up after about 1, 2 and 3 weeks. Results: Altogether, 320 patients with e-prescriptions, transmitted from March 21 through April 6 and not picked-up or dispensed, were identified and randomised to the study. There were no statistically significant differences in overall pick-up rates between the groups or with respect to gender. However, pick-up rates increased with increasing age. Higher pick-up rates were observed for two subgroups (but only in the mailed reminder group compared with controls)—for cardiovascular drugs to men and for respiratory drugs to adolescents and young adults. Conclusion: A reminder (i.e., a mailed letter or short telephone call) from the pharmacy to the patient had no statistically significant effect on overall pick-up rates of unclaimed e-prescriptions compared with no reminders.
KeywordsPick-up rates Primary non-compliance Reminders Unclaimed prescriptions Sweden
The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of the staff at the participating pharmacies in Boden, Luleå, Sundsvall and Örnsköldsvik. The authors would like to thank Gunnar Lindberg for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
- 2.Ekedahl A, Wessling A, Melander A. Primary non-compliance with automated prescription transmittals from health care centres in Sweden. J Soc Adm Pharm. 2002;19(4):137–40.Google Scholar
- 7.Lash S, Harding J. Abandoned prescriptions: Quantitative assessment of their cause. J Man Care Pharm. 1995;1:193–9.Google Scholar
- 9.Leu S, Eng K. Determination of unclaimed prescriptions at an outpatient department, Songklanagarind Hospital. J Pharm Pract. 1999;12(6):433–40.Google Scholar
- 11.Schafheutle EI, Hassell K, Seston EM, Noyce PR. Non-dispensing of NHS prescriptions in community pharmacies. Int J Pharm Pract. 2002;10:11–5.Google Scholar
- 12.Dong BJ, McCart GM, Lynch SS. Reducing unclaimed prescriptions through pharmacist intervention. Hosp Pharm. 1998;33:841–6.Google Scholar
- 15.Hamilton WR, Hopkins UK. Survey on unclaimed prescriptions in a community pharmacy. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 1997;NS37(3):341–5.Google Scholar
- 16.Secnik K, Pathak DS, Cohen JM. Postcard and telephone reminders for unclaimed prescriptions: a comparative evaluation using survival analysis. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2000;40(2):243–51; quiz 330–1.Google Scholar
- 17.Tavitian SM, Kidder PA, Shane R. Contacting patients with unclaimed prescriptions: the pharmacist´s impact on drug therapy concordance. Hosp Pharm. 2001;36:1060–5.Google Scholar