Advertisement

Pharmacy World & Science

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 9–16 | Cite as

Pharmacist domiciliary visiting in England: identifying the characteristics associated with continuation

  • Debi BhattacharyaEmail author
  • David J. Wright
  • John R. Purvis
Research Article

Abstract

Objective

To characterize Pharmacist Domiciliary Visiting Services (PDVSs) in England.

Setting

Primary Care Organizations (PCOs) in England which are groups providing primary care services to populations of similar health needs within defined geographical areas.

Method

A questionnaire was designed and posted to all PCOs in England in order to identify the number that had provided or were presently providing a PDVS and determine the nature of the services. PDVS characteristics that were related to long term continuation or termination were then identified.

Main outcome measure

To quantify and describe the format of operational and terminated PDVSs across England and identify similarities and differences between operational and terminated PDVSs.

Results

A response rate of 81.5% was achieved (247/303) with 70% of PCOs reporting that to the best of their terminated services did so at or before 1 year of operation, several citing a lack of referrals as a contributing factor. PDVSs varied widely in design however, the only significant differences between operational and terminated PDVSs were that operational PDVSs incorporated a greater number of referral sources in the PDVS design which were more likely to be social services, general medical practitioners and community nurses.

Conclusions

Most PDVSs had numerous characteristics in common however no two PDVSs were identical. Characteristics involved in the creation of service demand such as number and type of referral sources, are more likely to be associated with PDVS continuation.

Keywords

Domiciliary visiting Pharmacist Primary Care Organization Referral source England 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Funding This survey was funded by a studentship of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.

Conflicts of interest None declared.

References

  1. 1.
    Anon. Working party report. A domiciliary pharmaceutical service. Pharm J 1988;241:90–93.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anon. Pharmaceutical care: The future for community pharmacy. Published by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society on behalf of the Department of Health and the profession. London 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hawksworth GM, Chrystyn H. Clinical pharmacy domiciliary service. An extended role of the community pharmacist. J Appl Ther 1997;1:325–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahitan B, Kluettgens, Sun H, Gilday N, Honeybourne D. Bridging the gap: home medication reviews for adult cystic fibrosis patients conducted by community pharmacists in co-operation with the regional specialist centre. Int J Pharm Pract 2005;13:R40.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sorensen L, Stokes JA, Woodward M, Elliott R, Roberts MS. Medication reviews in the community: results of a randomized, controlled effectiveness trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2004;58(6):648–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fitten J, Coleman L, Siembieda DW, Yu M, Ganzell S. Assessment of capacity to comply with medication regimens in older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43:361–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lowe, CJ. The Influence of medication review and education on compliance in the elderly. (PhD Thesis). University of Bradford;1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Begley S, Livingstone C, Hodges N, Williamson V. Impact of domiciliary pharmacy visits on medication management in an elderly population. Int J Pharm Pract 1997;5:111–21.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holland R, Lenaghan E, Harvey I, Smith R, Shepstone L, Lipp A, Christou M, Evans D, Hand C. Does home based medication review keep older people out of hospital? The HOMER randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2005;330:293–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holland R. Medication reviews hang in balance. Reported quote. Pharm J 2005;274:106.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anon. Pharmacy domiciliary visits to start in West Glamorgan. Pharm J 1994;253:82.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beech E, Brackley K. Domiciliary based medication review for the elderly. Pharm J 1996;256:620–2.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Begley S. Provision of domiciliary pharmacy services by community pharmacists. Pharm J 1993;251:R32.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bourne J, Taylor L, Goldstein R. Community pharmacists’ domiciliary visiting scheme. Pharm J 1998;261:R41.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dixon NHE. Domiciliary visiting:a review of compound analgesic use in the community. J Soc adm Pharm 1995;12(3):144–53.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Foulsham R, Goodyer L. Referrals made by different health care professionals to community pharmacists for domiciliary visits. Int J Pharm Pract 1999;7:86–91.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Humfress A, Timbrell H. Home choice-a care scheme with a domiciliary pharmacy service. Pharm J 1992;249:686–87.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Naylor DM, Oxley DV. Assessing the need for a domiciliary pharmaceutical service for elderly patients using a coding system to record and quantify data. Pharm J 1997:479–84.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rothwell J. Domiciliary pharmacy counselling services. Pharm J 1993;March 13, 250:334.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schneider J, Barber N. Provision of a domiciliary service by community pharmacists. Int J Pharm Pract 1996;4(1):19–24.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stewart S, Marley JE, Horowitz, JD. Effects of a multidisciplinary, home-based intervention on unplanned readmissions and survival among patients with chronic congestive heart failure: a randomised controlled study. The Lancet 1999;354:1077–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Outreach project for Norfolk. Chemist and Druggist. 1996;246:534.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pharmacy practice:Extending the boundaries. Pharm Mag 1999;5(11):14.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    www.psncdatabase.co.uk. Select ‘domiciliary services’. Accessed on 06/02/2006.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Foulsham R, Goodyer L. Referrals made by different health care professionals to community pharmacists for domiciliary visits. Int J Pharm Pract 1999;7:86–91.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oxman A, Flottorp S. An overview of strategies to promote implementation of evidence-based health care. In: Silagy C, Haines A (eds.) Evidence-based practice in primary care, 2nd edn. London: BMJ books, 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debi Bhattacharya
    • 1
    Email author
  • David J. Wright
    • 1
  • John R. Purvis
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Chemical Sciences & PharmacyUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
  2. 2.School of PharmacyUniversity of BradfordWest YorkshireUK

Personalised recommendations